• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

what h/c/i

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtb19nh
  • Start date Start date Nov 12, 2005

jtb19nh

Member
Jul 9, 2005
156
0
17
Nov 12, 2005
#1
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #1
i have a 95 gt the engine is stock with 150000 mi. i am looking for more power what h/c/i should i get. it is a daily driver. i am looking to eventually be around 300 rwhp.
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Nov 12, 2005
#2
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #2
trick flow kit
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 12, 2005
#3
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #3
All of the well known heads will get you to your goal of 300rwhp.

For the most part, you can see the same kind of results with the various well known intakes as well.

IMHO, your choice of cam can be more critical in the success of the combo.

What I find so interesting is if you compare the dyno results of combos you find on these various sites you will quickly see the way they make their power is not the same between them even though they all put up numbers around 300 rwhp.

IMHO, the Question is not about ................
which h/c/i combo is best
but
what are your expectations from a combo?

A great 1/4 mile strip burner most likely won't make the best street car and vice versa.

Grady
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
Nov 12, 2005
#4
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #4
final5-0 said:
All of the well known heads will get you to your goal of 300rwhp.

For the most part, you can see the same kind of results with the various well known intakes as well.

IMHO, your choice of cam can be more critical in the success of the combo.

What I find so interesting is if you compare the dyno results of combos you find on these various sites you will quickly see the way they make their power is not the same between them even though they all put up numbers around 300 rwhp.

IMHO, the Question is not about ................
which h/c/i combo is best
but
what are your expectations from a combo?

A great 1/4 mile strip burner most likely won't make the best street car and vice versa.

Grady
Click to expand...

This is a great response (above).

I'm building a totally street car AND I have to pass emissions. What a pain! But, the good thing is there are plenty of choices out there centered around a mild cam which will take me to the 300rwhp and beyond while remaining streetable and emissions friendly. If I stuck with the 302 NA, I would probably consider the Performer Intake, AFR 165 legal heads, and a mild cam by a reputable company. Add on a full exhaust and whatever else necessary for the new h/c/i to work and I think this would be a great street combo. However, stroking the 302 to 347 would be even more powerful and I could upgrade all of the engine internals and still pass emissions. Of course, a few more things would need to be upgraded to run the 347, but it would all be in the name of added power, driveability, and reliability.

I said all that above for a reason. If emissions weren't a factor and if this wasn't a daily driver, I would go a completely different direction and use different parts. And it would cost less. Good to know all this up front, though.

I'm almost at 150,000 miles, but I'm afraid to do anything to this engine. It has never been cracked open and is still running great. I'm going to run this engine for another 1-2 years and then remove it for a crate motor. Gotta finish the foundation first.
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Nov 12, 2005
#5
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #5
Trick Flow, Holley, and Edelbrock all make good H/C/I's. Or you could mix and match pieces. Just remember that new performance parts on the top of the motor will put added stress on the lower half...so make sure the internals are up to par.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Nov 12, 2005
#6
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #6
I don't follow. You want a HCI on your high mileage stock motor for a year or two. They you intend to go with a crate motor. Why spend all that cash twice?

Just put it on the bottle for now, that should give you some power. Then do the crate engine even sooner.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 12, 2005
#7
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #7
GRGT1994 said:
I don't follow. You want a HCI on your high mileage stock motor for a year or two. They you intend to go with a crate motor. Why spend all that cash twice?
Click to expand...

Huh? The first guy didn't say anything about a crate motor....

Car Nut said:
I'm almost at 150,000 miles, but I'm afraid to do anything to this engine. It has never been cracked open and is still running great. I'm going to run this engine for another 1-2 years and then remove it for a crate motor. Gotta finish the foundation first.
Click to expand...

.....but this guy did. I think you thought they were the same.

Grady is right about what you want your car to do. FWIW, a lot of guys (myself included) really enjoy the Trickflow kit, it's pretty much guaranteed to get you almost to 300rwhp by itself, with some boltons and exhaust that usually go with the h/c/i setups, you will see 300. It's a good street combo too, as it still retains decent low-end torque. Gears are a must though, at least 3.73's. Now, I wish I had 4.10's because I rev to 6,000 instead of 5,400. Eh, what can you do though? lol
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
Nov 12, 2005
#8
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #8
GRGT1994 said:
I don't follow. You want a HCI on your high mileage stock motor for a year or two. They you intend to go with a crate motor. Why spend all that cash twice?

Just put it on the bottle for now, that should give you some power. Then do the crate engine even sooner.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I was just throwing out a couple options. I mentioned the crate motor, because with all those miles it would be the safest option, but not cheapest necessarily.

For the guy interested in the h/c/i, you may want to throw in a rebuild kit to freshen things up and strengthen the bottom end (like already mentioned).
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 12, 2005
#9
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #9
Car Nut said:
This is a great response (above).

I'm building a totally street car AND I have to pass emissions. What a pain! But, the good thing is there are plenty of choices out there centered around a mild cam which will take me to the 300rwhp and beyond while remaining streetable and emissions friendly. If I stuck with the 302 NA, I would probably consider the Performer Intake, AFR 165 legal heads, and a mild cam by a reputable company. Add on a full exhaust and whatever else necessary for the new h/c/i to work and I think this would be a great street combo. However, stroking the 302 to 347 would be even more powerful and I could upgrade all of the engine internals and still pass emissions. Of course, a few more things would need to be upgraded to run the 347, but it would all be in the name of added power, driveability, and reliability.

I said all that above for a reason. If emissions weren't a factor and if this wasn't a daily driver, I would go a completely different direction and use different parts. And it would cost less. Good to know all this up front, though.

I'm almost at 150,000 miles, but I'm afraid to do anything to this engine. It has never been cracked open and is still running great. I'm going to run this engine for another 1-2 years and then remove it for a crate motor. Gotta finish the foundation first.
Click to expand...

From the things I learned with my combo, I would tell you these things:

1) Emissions is no problem

2) Drivability is no problem

3) If I did it again, I'd have my cam guy (Ed Curtis) go hotter with the specs for more power and I still could say the same for items 1 & 2.

It all boils down to my choice of ...... cam & tune.

Grady
 

loudpedal99

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
160
0
0
ND
Nov 12, 2005
#10
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #10
sage2k said:
trick flow kit
Click to expand...

+1, this is essentially what I will have (finished, finally!) this week. The only difference being the trickflow intake, which I plan on upgrading to.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Nov 13, 2005
#11
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #11
jtb19nh said:
i have a 95 gt the engine is stock with 150000 mi. i am looking for more power what h/c/i should i get. it is a daily driver. i am looking to eventually be around 300 rwhp.
Click to expand...

I did H/C/I then a 347 and have on order Vortech

What I really want to say is think hard about a path for your car. Things you do now will affect future steps. I didn't, anyway a powerful street car is easy, but think of the future.

Well I am going off the wall here but have you thought of a Super Charger. You could get to 300 pretty easy and still keep your mileage if you weren't born with a lead foot save for a 347 or crate motor.


A 347 or 331 is a lot of fun and I would suggest it to anyone... Can you say torque.


Anyway the main thing is to Have Fun. Think first where am I going with this!!

Steve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Catch can questions.
  • AngryH58
  • Sep 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
160
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2026
squeak93
S
Am I crazy? Dad looking to buy 69 as daily
  • stonerCPA
  • Oct 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
307
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2026
nickyb
L
Door pull panels, convertible versus coupe
  • lenzgt
  • Jun 25, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
193
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 25, 2026
lenzgt
L
D
Loud noise(s) from Engine Bay
  • DuluthFoxbody
  • Oct 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
347
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 3:50 PM
AeroCoupe
K
Engine Gt40p vs 180 procomp
  • Kleinjj27
  • Oct 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
428
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 3, 2026
Kleinjj27
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?