• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What is a "respectable" quarter mile time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter InMyPrimeSVT
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

InMyPrimeSVT

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2001
869
2
19
Cincinnati
Nov 24, 2005
#1
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #1
When would you guys say you can quit upgrading for speed b/c you have a respectable quarter time? I ran a 14.1 before my headers and all the stuff sitting in my barn (which is still sitting there). With every year it seems like the fast cars get faster, so I'm wondering what you all consider a very respectable quarter mile time.
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Nov 24, 2005
#2
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #2
im shooting for low 10's with a 347 and a 150 shot in my vert by the middle of next year. i think that will be pretty impressive and pretty fast. fast enough to spank just about anyones ass on the street if i do so feel inclined. if i could get low 10's i would be happy with that.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Nov 24, 2005
#3
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #3
I hear you on the cars getting faster...you'll never stop adding parts to keep up in here...:SNSign:
With that said....13s has always been a respectable number to me...we can all atest to the 14.1 trying to get to the 13s...only a 1/10...but it can be elusive...
I run mid 13s and now there's prolly a low 13 there if I drove it hard enuf and had more seat time with the right tire combo...I set my goal at 13s and made it...so that suffices for the moment...Is it enough...hell no...
Nowadays 12s are the new benchmark to me...
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Nov 24, 2005
#4
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #4
i use to think 15's were we fast, till i got 14's now i want 13's and im sure it will continue
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 24, 2005
#5
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #5
Way back when I first got my car I set out to run LOW 13's in my car. My buddies and I at the time all thought that was plenty quick for a street car. My opinion has definitely changed on that though, especially when you see things like this...

http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50114

I think a 12 second car is "respectable" but 11's or quicker are starting to be what's needed to get my attention.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 24, 2005
#6
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #6
That is just one of those answers that each person has their own opinion about.

If we are talking about the typical na combo street car .............

1/4 mile et's can be so misleading simply cause most of them can't 60 foot.

however

If you got a chance to drive those same cars around on the street you would quickly see they make a great deal of power.

Most of the 300rwhp combos you find on this forum will et mid to high 12's. With better hook and optimum driving skills that same car could dip in the 11's.

Grady
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Nov 25, 2005
#7
  • Nov 25, 2005
  • #7
OF COURSE it all depends.... and i dont know how much stock you want to hold on a 19 year old's opinion... but as far as I'm concerned, I'd be happy with 13's in an sn vert, and low 13's from a coupe when considering the weight of our cars and just bolt ons (no power adders). but if you'r throwing a power adder on you better hit the 12's and an aftermarket block/ h/c/i 12's and 11's are in order. and also, an impressive car in my opinion is the fit and finish of the work and who did it (was it done by the driver/ owner of the car) and consider the budget the car is on. the most impressive cars to me are the nice ones that look good up close, have something original done to them... and run times better than what their combo seems to allow them to run. JUST DRIVE WELL, DRIVE FAST ON THE TRACK, AND TAKE GOOD CARE OF YOUR STUFF, and you'll have an impressive car... i'd be impressed by most of these cars in person
 

InMyPrimeSVT

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2001
869
2
19
Cincinnati
Nov 25, 2005
#8
  • Nov 25, 2005
  • #8
Who's 19?
 
8

88GT460

New Member
Sep 23, 2004
338
0
0
Arkansas
Nov 25, 2005
#9
  • Nov 25, 2005
  • #9
A 10 second all motor mustang is impressive. Nitrous is the cheap way out.
 
2

215what

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
154
0
0
NM
Nov 25, 2005
#10
  • Nov 25, 2005
  • #10
3's is the only way ha ha...
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Nov 26, 2005
#11
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #11
lol i was hoping for a high 12 secondtime on juice with my combo. boy was i surprised when i went 11.56 with a passenger at 2000 ft above sea lvl. i think your 94 will be in the low 13's
 

The Hitman

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
2,541
0
0
Orlando, FL
Nov 26, 2005
#12
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #12
Killercanary said:
Way back when I first got my car I set out to run LOW 13's in my car. My buddies and I at the time all thought that was plenty quick for a street car. My opinion has definitely changed on that though, especially when you see things like this...

http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50114

I think a 12 second car is "respectable" but 11's or quicker are starting to be what's needed to get my attention.
Click to expand...

Drool... I so badly want an SRT8 (of the CHARGER persuasion). 4500 lb's and 12's. You gotta give that credit! That is hauling some serious you know what.
 

rgs

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
124
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Nov 26, 2005
#13
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #13
The Hitman said:
Drool... I so badly want an SRT8 (of the CHARGER persuasion). 4500 lb's and 12's. You gotta give that credit! That is hauling some serious you know what.
Click to expand...

ass?
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 26, 2005
#14
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #14
12's
RC
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Nov 26, 2005
#15
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #15
I started out running mid 15's w/ mine and got it down into the high 12's before we parted ways.
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Nov 26, 2005
#16
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #16
InMyPrimeSVT said:
Who's 19?
Click to expand...
...yours truly
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 26, 2005
#17
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #17
droptopford 5 0 said:
OF COURSE it all depends.... and i dont know how much stock you want to hold on a 19 year old's opinion...
Click to expand...

For the most part .................

I'd say your opinion is thought of no differently than all the others

To me, that is what makes this forum :SNSign: the good thing it is

but as far as I'm concerned, I'd be happy with 13's in an sn vert, and low 13's from a coupe when considering the weight of our cars and just bolt ons (no power adders). but if you'r throwing a power adder on you better hit the 12's and an aftermarket block/ h/c/i 12's and 11's are in order. and also, an impressive car in my opinion is the fit and finish of the work and who did it (was it done by the driver/ owner of the car) and consider the budget the car is on. the most impressive cars to me are the nice ones that look good up close, have something original done to them... and run times better than what their combo seems to allow them to run. JUST DRIVE WELL, DRIVE FAST ON THE TRACK, AND TAKE GOOD CARE OF YOUR STUFF, and you'll have an impressive car... i'd be impressed by most of these cars in person
Click to expand...

I'm with you :Teh-Win:

I like Stangs to not only go great ... they look great as well

Unfortunately it takes a bit more $$$ to make that happen

Grady
 

InMyPrimeSVT

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2001
869
2
19
Cincinnati
Nov 26, 2005
#18
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #18
droptopford 5 0 said:
...yours truly
Click to expand...

Oh ok, no biggie. I thought you were rippin on someone for being 19. Anyways, I agreed wtih your thoughts. Thanks for posting.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 26, 2005
#19
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #19
I think 12's is respectable. But it has to have a minimum trap speed in my own thoughts. Atleast 105mph so that way it shows that is isn't just all in the suspension or 60ft. Just my opinion.
 

DarkProphet

Founding Member
Aug 19, 2002
391
0
0
Quakertown, PA
Nov 26, 2005
#20
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #20
I want 11's or 12's. Ill decide once i get to run my new combo. If im already in the 12's ill go for 11's, if im only in the 13's ill go for 12's....
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
383
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
F
1990 mustang GT, essentials to making a 5,000 mile round trip (Michigan to California, and back)
  • FreeMustangProject
  • May 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
899
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 14, 2025
hoopty5.0
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
763
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
277
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?