• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What Is That Canister For In The Pass Side Front

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89llx
  • Start date Start date Apr 21, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
H

Hardinkyle5.0

New Member
Jan 8, 2015
24
1
3
Apr 24, 2015
#41
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #41
Lol my dad worked on the 302 line unhook them and unhook your smog and plug it correctly you will not have any faults
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 24, 2015
#42
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #42
Hardinkyle5.0 said:
Lol my dad worked on the 302 line unhook them and unhook your smog and plug it correctly you will not have any faults
Click to expand...

You are saying to disconnect the salt and pepper connections, then disconnect your smog equipment, and you will NOT have any codes thrown or a CEL. How do you plug them in "correctly" not to throw off codes or a CEL.

Serious?

Are you aware they control all of your engine sensors and injectors. (courtesy of jrichker)




Ford did not recall the 10 pin connectors for your reason stated. Still waiting for you to explain what the original Ford harness "didn't read smog".
 
H

Hardinkyle5.0

New Member
Jan 8, 2015
24
1
3
Apr 24, 2015
#43
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #43
How many conectors do you have?? You should only have 2 not 4 connections delete the one set and plug the others back in
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 24, 2015
#44
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #44
Hardinkyle5.0 said:
How many conectors do you have?? You should only have 2 not 4 connections delete the one set and plug the others back in
Click to expand...

How does the original harness not read smog. You're making no sense.


The Ford recall added the extensions, it dd not remove them, The recall was not because they could not read smog- whataver that means. The recall was because Ford incorrectly thought the connectors were not long enough and that intermiitent contact of the wires caused a false CEL for the EVP or EGR. This was wrong. All it did was create 2 more connectors to cause problems. All that was needed was to clean and tighten the pins up and move the harness further down on the firewall, so most people removed the extensions.

Oh.... look at my avatar, Does my car look stock to you?

It's been fun.
 
H

Hardinkyle5.0

New Member
Jan 8, 2015
24
1
3
Apr 24, 2015
#45
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #45
What's your car run like 12?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 24, 2015
#46
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #46
Hardinkyle5.0 said:
No you won't dumbass unhook your ten point harness that reads the smog
Click to expand...

Why....so I can disable my car altogether? You're really just spit-balling and hoping nobody will notice here, aren't you?

I'd ask you what you thought the TAB and TAD sensors were and what codes you might get when you plugged off (or did away with) the the vacuum lines...or sensors themselves that previously went to the now absent diverter valves of your smog pump system....but I'd be afraid to blow your mind. That and I don't really have the time to wait for you to Google the answer and then incorrectly interpret it like you did the salt and pepper shakers. Nor have I the desire to watch you try to convince us all that you knew said information right off the top of your head, when its obvious you don't.

If you're trying to convince us that the car will run with the smog system removed, then save your cursive. We all know it will.....but you WILL trip error codes, you WILL produce dirtier emmisions that can and will lead to other issues, you WILL needlessly pollute the environment and piss off your fellow drivers and you WILL be doing it for no good reason.

And what difference does it make what his car runs?

Don't mean to come off so sternly with you, but you entered this thread with a "don't stink" attitude, provide incomplete and/or incorrect information and then lash out when someone with obvously more experience and expertise than you attempts to correct you on it. You kind of earn your stripes on thsi one.

Have you ever heard the expression "If you find yourself in a hole....quit digging"?
 
Reactions: A5literMan, jrichker and mikestang63

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Apr 24, 2015
#47
  • Apr 24, 2015
  • #47
Noobz347 said:
Not sure if serious.
Click to expand...
Now I wouldn't tell a fib.
Look close. See the little brass cap? That ain't no charcoal canister.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 25, 2015
#48
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #48
Onefine88 said:
Now I wouldn't tell a fib.
Look close. See the little brass cap? That ain't no charcoal canister.
Click to expand...


Why would you intentionally vent a fuel tank line into a frame rail though?
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Apr 25, 2015
#49
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #49
Noobz347 said:
Why would you intentionally vent a fuel tank line into a frame rail though?
Click to expand...
The end of the line was laying where the canister once hung. There is a square little opening in the frame there. I stuck it in.
Why not.LOL
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 25, 2015
#50
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #50
Onefine88 said:
The end of the line was laying where the canister once hung. There is a square little opening in the frame there. I stuck it in.
Why not.LOL
Click to expand...


Well emmmm.... because you're venting fuel vapor into the frame rail from the engine bay?

Hell I dunno, mount a spark plug in there with a DO NOT PRESS button on the dash.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 25, 2015
#51
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #51
Kinda wondering why you deleted it at all? The canister is tucked down pretty low and out of the way. Not really an eye sore?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 25, 2015
#52
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #52
Hardinkyle5.0 said:
Ten point harness it was a recall fords original harness didn't read smog so they put an adapter that did unplug it and connect the originals
Click to expand...


You aren't serious...are you?


Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Apr 25, 2015
#53
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #53
Gearbanger 101 said:
Kinda wondering why you deleted it at all? The canister is tucked down pretty low and out of the way. Not really an eye sore?
Click to expand...

If your question is for me. I deleted it all because my car is nearly 28 years old and I no longer wanted it on my engine. LIke I mentioned before I deleted the canister because I needed to use that location to mount my Methanol/water injection reservoir. It needs to be located below the blower.

I originally had plans to relocate the canister in another location down there somewhere behind the scenes but haven't got around to it. Might put it inside the fender liner.
I da know

@Newbz347 I see your point on the vent line. Didn't think of that and I will remove it from the frame rail until I come up with a good plan on possibly reinstalling the canister somewhere. (just in case)
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 25, 2015
#54
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #54
Yeah man, put a small filter or something on it and at least vent it outside of tbe engine bay until you can find a more permanent solution.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 25, 2015
#55
  • Apr 25, 2015
  • #55
Definitely vent it somewhere where the fumes cannot accumulate.


Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
 
8

89llx

5 Year Member
Aug 31, 2009
302
5
29
Apr 26, 2015
#56
  • Apr 26, 2015
  • #56
Why not just hook it back up to the intake ,like ford had it
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 26, 2015
#57
  • Apr 26, 2015
  • #57
You don't want to vent uncontrolled into the intake.

Back in the 70s all cars just vented the tank. The key is venting it in such a way to prevent explosive vapor buikdup


Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
 
8

89llx

5 Year Member
Aug 31, 2009
302
5
29
Apr 26, 2015
#58
  • Apr 26, 2015
  • #58
ok so if I should not put the hose back on the intake,, where should it go?
 
8

89llx

5 Year Member
Aug 31, 2009
302
5
29
Apr 26, 2015
#59
  • Apr 26, 2015
  • #59
I think I will just put the hose in the inerfender, with the air filter, [ power pipe]
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 27, 2015
#60
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #60
Just vent it somewhere that would get decent air movement.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Forced Induction Bypass valve reference
  • JD1964
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
324
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2025
JD1964
Engine Radiator with no shroud provision... What to do?
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
FastDriver
Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
756
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
435
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
515
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?