• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech

What is the best CAI for V6

  • Thread starter Thread starter bleeblee
  • Start date Start date Jan 29, 2006
B

bleeblee

New Member
Dec 17, 2004
34
0
0
Jan 29, 2006
#1
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • #1
I am buying one next week. which is the best.

AEM

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/AEM-...ewItemQQcategoryZ38634QQitemZ8031828579QQrdZ1

K&N

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/05-2...ewItemQQcategoryZ33659QQitemZ8033671780QQrdZ1

S&B

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2005...ewItemQQcategoryZ38634QQitemZ8033011100QQrdZ1

AIR-RAID

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/AIRA...ewItemQQcategoryZ38634QQitemZ8032948263QQrdZ1

If you have any of these please let me know if its good or not.
 

fazm83

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
747
0
0
phoenix, arizona
Jan 29, 2006
#2
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • #2
I think AEM is the only one shown to not work so well. I have the K&N and it definately made a big difference (14.91 to 14.73 at the track)

Dont know bout the other two
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Jan 29, 2006
#3
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • #3
IMO, theyre all about the same. There isnt much power to be had by spending $100 more on one that another. For me, it was hard to justify $200+ on CAI, so I made my own. Im sure if I spent more money on a legit intake, there would be more air flow, but not enough to justify the ~$200 price difference.
 
J

Jimp

New Member
Apr 9, 2005
486
0
0
Jan 29, 2006
#4
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • #4
E) None of the above. Get the C&L.
 

hamidlmt

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
147
0
0
Jan 29, 2006
#5
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • #5
I second the C&L... of course, you'll need a tune from Doug at Bamachips too to use it. This combination will truly change the way your car drives.

Looks like all of those listed don't need a tune... out of those choices, I'd go with the air-raid.
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
Jan 29, 2006
#6
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • #6
A good CAI requires a tune. Your airflow should improve enough that you will need to reflash your computer.

The C&L has been shown to perform very well. The Tunable Induction kit also works well. The MMR kit is good, but too pricey.

Right now the best bang for your buck would be a C&L or TI and an SCT XCALII.

You will be driving a different car after that....
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Jan 31, 2006
#7
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #7
^I dont agree. There airflow isnt a night and day difference like some like to think. After talking to a few guys (SCT programmers) about what should be done after my CAI and catback, they told me the computer will not need to be reflashed. The computer can sense when certain things are changed, otherwise, simple changes such as temperature and air desity would have huge effects on how the engine runs if the computer was just on one fixed program with no le-way.
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
Jan 31, 2006
#8
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #8
almostblown said:
^I dont agree. There airflow isnt a night and day difference like some like to think. After talking to a few guys (SCT programmers) about what should be done after my CAI and catback, they told me the computer will not need to be reflashed. The computer can sense when certain things are changed, otherwise, simple changes such as temperature and air desity would have huge effects on how the engine runs if the computer was just on one fixed program with no le-way.
Click to expand...

You are correct in part. The computer does compensate and adjust. But some intakes REQUIRE a flash. Why? Some intakes trigger your CEL. Why? Is it becasue the airflow increases past what the computer is programmed to compensate for? And to fully take advantage of improved airflow and to get rid of pesky things like throttle lag, a tuner is a must.
 

WinterHawk

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
11
0
0
Sunny Florida
Feb 2, 2006
#9
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #9
I can only comment on the AirAid, as that's what I have. With the stock air box and a K&N drop-in filter, to the AirAid CAI, I gained 6rwhp between dyno runs and hit the mystical 194rwhp wall - I like the look and was easy to install myself.

 

Attachments

  • 8IMG_0649.webp
    64.7 KB · Views: 153

red05v6stang

New Member
Sep 10, 2005
116
1
0
Feb 2, 2006
#10
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #10
you should think about pulling that off, having the bracket chromed and the pipe painted to match the car................then again i like getting every detail haha.
 

LIZARDKING

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
21
14
28
Hell
Feb 2, 2006
#11
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #11
Your all wrong about the reflash.

The MAF is matched to the size of the inlet tube.

Some aftermarket inlet tubes, like the C&L have a larger inlet tube, this throws off your MAF.

Thats why the computer needs to be reflashed.

It has nothing to do with increased airflow into the engine, only airflow past the MAF.

The engine is only going to PULL as much air into the TB as it needs.

A larger MAF inlet tube isnt going to change a thing. Except the balance in your bank account.
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
Feb 2, 2006
#12
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #12
Twofocused said:
Your all wrong about the reflash.

The MAF is matched to the size of the inlet tube.

Some aftermarket inlet tubes, like the C&L have a larger inlet tube, this throws off your MAF.

Thats why the computer needs to be reflashed.

It has nothing to do with increased airflow into the engine, only airflow past the MAF.

The engine is only going to PULL as much air into the TB as it needs.

A larger MAF inlet tube isnt going to change a thing. Except the balance in your bank account.
Click to expand...

Here is the stock air box vs the C&L in back to back dyno testing on my car. While it may not be as big as the claims there is a definite gain! There is no denying that things have improved!



Now that I've uncorked my exhaust it would be very interesting to repeat the test and see how the stock air box compares to the C&L... Unfortunately I don't have the time or money to try it... But I'm betting there my be a bigger difference...
 
H

Hammy

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
39
0
0
NC
Feb 2, 2006
#13
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #13
Twofocused said:
Your all wrong about the reflash.

The MAF is matched to the size of the inlet tube.

Some aftermarket inlet tubes, like the C&L have a larger inlet tube, this throws off your MAF.

Thats why the computer needs to be reflashed.

It has nothing to do with increased airflow into the engine, only airflow past the MAF.

The engine is only going to PULL as much air into the TB as it needs.

A larger MAF inlet tube isnt going to change a thing. Except the balance in your bank account.
Click to expand...

Okay...how can you have more airflow going past the MAF, but not into the engine?
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
Feb 2, 2006
#14
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #14
Why a tune is required...

To calculate the air volume going past the MAF sensor the car's computer knows the size of the stock MAF housing and uses that to calculate the air volume. Change the size of the MAF housing and you throw off the calcuation. Example (i've got the graphs somewhere). Using my X-Cal2 I datalogged the stock air box and recorded different air flow parameters... I then installed the MMR and repeated... The results... According to the car's computer the MMR was flowing LESS air than the stock air box. Why? Because the MMR changed the MAF housing size. The MAF housing is larger so the computer was calculating LESS air than was actually entering the engine... so the car's computer seen LESS air so it called for LESS gas... So the car leaned out which give you the power gain...
 

LIZARDKING

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
21
14
28
Hell
Feb 3, 2006
#15
  • Feb 3, 2006
  • #15
I think a $300 CAI for our cars is a big waste of money, period.

Its my belief that the gains come from having a smooth tube between the TB and MAF.

Of course, C&L and every other company that is fleecing us for $300 CAIs arent going to admit this.
 
N

NJstangpilot

New Member
Apr 5, 2005
101
0
0
Bloomfield, NJ
Feb 7, 2006
#16
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #16
Twofocused said:
I think a $300 CAI for our cars is a big waste of money, period.

Its my belief that the gains come from having a smooth tube between the TB and MAF.

Of course, C&L and every other company that is fleecing us for $300 CAIs arent going to admit this.
Click to expand...

Not worth it??!!!

You get a piece of plastic, a filter, and another piece of plastic! If that's not worth 300 bucks I don't know what is. I mean *TWO* pieces of plastic!! That's a *deal*....
 

rygenstormlocke

former 10 second badass
Aug 13, 2005
698
0
0
Northern Virginia
Feb 7, 2006
#17
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #17
Twofocused said:
I think a $300 CAI for our cars is a big waste of money, period.

Its my belief that the gains come from having a smooth tube between the TB and MAF.

Of course, C&L and every other company that is fleecing us for $300 CAIs arent going to admit this.
Click to expand...


The price is indeed hard to swallow, and perhaps over time they will come down. But for now they are what they are, and if you want to get all the gains you can possible get, then this will have to be on the list.

If you fab one on your own, do a before/after dyno and show some good gains, please let us know and how you did it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
131
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
N
2008 V6 Mustang Won’t Cold Start
  • nraffy13
  • Nov 17, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2020
nraffy13
N
Progress Thread 2008 Mustang GT, DIY CAI any feedback Is welcome!
  • mathews175
  • Jan 10, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2020
mathews175
Best Cold Air For 2v?
  • Adam Dugger
  • Sep 3, 2017
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 5, 2017
squeak93
Progress Thread 1994 Free Mustang Budget Build - Project Maui Cruiser
  • Justin Fetalvero
  • Mar 7, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 20, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?