• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What kind of port job is this???

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90mustangGT
  • Start date Start date Jul 7, 2006

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 7, 2006
#1
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #1
So, I'm fixing all the leaks on my Chebby Cumaro (so I can sell it and finish the foxbody) and I have the intake off, and I heard that the heads were ported. Well, what kind of port job is this? Looks like someone took a die grinder and hit the out side of the ports. The sad part is the previous owner paid a lot of money for this port job. The exause side was never touched. Stock LT1 heads flow 212cfm on the intake side, so I guess these flow 214.

 

Attachments

  • portjobsbs.webp
    29.3 KB · Views: 304
K

kevin2m4

New Member
Mar 16, 2004
50
0
0
Barrie Ontario Canada
Jul 7, 2006
#2
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #2
that sucks
 
D

DeVus1

Founding Member
Mar 29, 2002
400
2
28
P-Town, Va.
Jul 7, 2006
#3
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #3
This is the very reason you should learn how to work on your car without a "professional." Sorry about homeskillets luck, but that is a ****tastic port job.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Jul 7, 2006
#4
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #4
looks like the ports were just tapered for a gasket match. Was the intake ported at all, if so some guys will taper the inlet of the ports just so that there is not an uneven lip that will slow down the air flow. Ive seen it done a few times before and had to do it myself. I bought my intake used and the lower was already gasket matched, but a full porting was done to the lower. When I bought rebuilt stock heads the intake ports were already tapered to the gasket. When I buy aluminum heads they will be matched up also.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 9, 2006
#5
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #5
No, the intake was not ported. The former owner payed over a grand to have them ported. Pretty sad I say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
961
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
913
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Resolved Question about Matt Farah’s Foxbody
  • Alldegree
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 16, 2024
Willybill32
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?