• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What mild cam ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stoney
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

stoney

Founding Member
Feb 4, 2000
205
0
0
Brandon MB
Dec 1, 2009
#21
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #21
4 stroke engines

4 stroke engines require no back pressure.

Have a look at light aircraft, aircraft have no mufflers. Most light aircraft have headers, that join into a single pipe with no muffler.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Dec 1, 2009
#22
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #22
Again if he is going to use a set of ported stock heads then he is better off leaving the stock cam in the car, the gains from another cam will not be worth the trouble. he is better of degreeing the stock cam and verifying the timing events ( they are off a little from the factory) and adding RR's ( don't forget better springs)for the added lift and gaining that way. IMHO I wouldn't even bother with those old "aplhabet" cams. Better heads heads then something like a trick flow stage 1 or 2, anderson, or even custom depending on the heads. stock heads= stock cam.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Dec 3, 2009
#23
  • Dec 3, 2009
  • #23
For ported stock heads, just leave the stocker cam in there. If you are set on a mild cam, the TFS stage 1 is my personal favorite or the E303 will do too. Honestly mildly ported stock head's are hardly worth the trouble IMO. Yes there are gains to be had but still... The biggest bottleneck is the intake. I would start there and work your way down. Exhaust will net you some gains but after 1k, you are better off putting that into some decent heads and a cam. Gears as stated will really do wonders on the SN95s. Might not be a bad place to start too.
Kevin
 

1/4 Mile Style

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
36
0
0
Dec 3, 2009
#24
  • Dec 3, 2009
  • #24
Everything works in conjunction with one another.

For those saying dont change this or that, but change this, that makes absolutely no sense.

Hmm, dont change the cam or heads, but put a bigger TB on lmao.

"Technically" if youre going to do anything to help with airflow, it should be across the board to see optimal gains.

However, most of us arent millionaires and we upgrade 1 or 2 parts at a time. That being said, there are no "right" or "wrong" suggestions in this thread.


Do whatever you can afford or that floats your boat.


Jon
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Dec 3, 2009
#25
  • Dec 3, 2009
  • #25
(imho)
I would hold off on a cam swap untill you go H/C/I/stroker/etc...

The 94-95 computer programming is a little *picky*, it isn't as forgiving as the 87-93 code and it tends to frown on things like longtubes and bigger cams.

So you may want to hold off on cam untill you're ready to buy a piggyback or pay for full custom tuning.

With just ported stock heads, a cobra (explorer) intake, bump timing 3-4 degrees, 3.73's, etc... you get a nice improvement in seat of the pants at a cost that wont break the bank.



PS... shift about 5-5500. Stock motor makes peak power about 48-5200 so trying to buzz the thing to 6K, you're just wasting time.
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Dec 3, 2009
#26
  • Dec 3, 2009
  • #26
stoney said:
4 stroke engines require no back pressure.

Have a look at light aircraft, aircraft have no mufflers. Most light aircraft have headers, that join into a single pipe with no muffler.
Click to expand...

1. aircraft run at 2-3000 rpm.

2. have you ever seen a port in an aircraft engine?!?!?! (hint: 1930's tech... makes a harley port look GOOD by comp )

- they wouldn't gain enough bennefit from exhaust pulse timing/tuning to make the effort/weight worthwhile.

3. compare dyno runs b-b of same car, same engine, same day with a 2", 2.5" and 3" exhaust... you will see quite clearly that yes, infact, a modern 4 stroke automobile v-8 engine, does gain bennies from proper backpressure, scavenging, exhaust wave/pulse tuning, etc... of a properly sized exhaust system.

Or compare same engine with 1.5" primary headers to 1.675 to 1.75 to 1.875 to 2" primaries and you will see it all makes a noticeable difference, just like cam timing, just like collector diamater and length, just like etc....

(not a HUGE amount at *true street car* hp levels, but noticeable just the same)

Dave
 
S

stoney

Founding Member
Feb 4, 2000
205
0
0
Brandon MB
Dec 3, 2009
#27
  • Dec 3, 2009
  • #27
Aircraft

I cruise/daily drive between 2-3k rpm.
What are header plugs for ?

The X portion of the exhaust will have a big muffling effect in itself.

As long as things are port matched, my header tube same size as my exhaust port ill have good flow.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
281
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Electrical 93 5.0 No Injector Pulse
  • machinermac
  • Jul 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
216
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 1, 2026
Willybill32
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
759
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
856
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?