• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

What springs for a 2002 GT Vert

  • Thread starter Thread starter krispy521
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2007
K

krispy521

New Member
Dec 9, 2005
20
0
2
May 8, 2007
#1
  • May 8, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys,

I'm looking to get rid of the 4x4 look finally. I need to get a set of lowering springs for my 2002 GT Convertible. I was looking to see what anyone could recommend for a spring that will lower the car as much as possible without the need for C & C plates. I just don't want to add another $200 to the price if I don't have to.

Also do I need new isolators or will the stock ones work fine?
 

BCB00GT

Founding Member
Mar 5, 2002
420
0
17
May 8, 2007
#2
  • May 8, 2007
  • #2
Definitely the Bullit springs. Should be able to run the Steeda springs, Eibach prokit without CCs. I would reuse the isolators.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
May 8, 2007
#3
  • May 8, 2007
  • #3
Convertibles are heavier than their coupe counterparts and will have a lower drop using convertible springs in my side-by-side comparison with my friend's hardtop Mustang. I have owned both H&R Super Sport and Eibach Pro Kit springs and when I did a side-by-side comparison with my friend's coupe (using identical springs), my convertible dropped lower.

I would personally suggest the Pro Kit. H&R's stance looked better, handled better, but scraped like mad on dips and bottomed out on tall speed bumps. The Pro Kit will drop you pretty low already on a convertible with slightly better ride quality.

On my observation of both brands of springs going on my convertible, the Eibach and H&R's had identical drop in inches for my rear, but the front stood higher with the Pro Kit.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
May 8, 2007
#4
  • May 8, 2007
  • #4
nothing here, sorry. i accidently reposted my post.
 

TrueBlue03

Member
Dec 9, 2003
372
3
18
Bay Area, CA
May 8, 2007
#5
  • May 8, 2007
  • #5
i'd say eibach pro kit, steeda sports or H&R Sports (not super sports) although eibach pro kit always seem to lower the rear just a tad lower than the front...NOT ALWAYS, but every car is different

Either way, all do a nice job of a moderate, noticeable drop without all the problems of a slammed stang. and you should be okay without caster camber plates on these springs.

bullit springs and mach 1 springs also have a bad tendancy to lower the rear more than the front...
 

streethorse

15 Year Member
Oct 8, 2005
1,042
6
58
Dallas Texas
May 8, 2007
#6
  • May 8, 2007
  • #6
Im just backing up what a couple of people have said.... On my 04 gt.....
Pro Kit, hard top, front drop= 3 quarter inch
rear drop= 1 inch

Reused all isolaters, no cc plates, no alignment as of yet.... I have seen no signs
of abnormal tire wear after 7 weeks.
 
K

krispy521

New Member
Dec 9, 2005
20
0
2
May 8, 2007
#7
  • May 8, 2007
  • #7
Thank you guys for all you help. I finally got a hold of my Steeda rep that lives across the street. He recommended the steeda sport springs. Of coarse he would because he is a steeda rep. I am afraid of the eibach rear sag that a lot of convertible owners have described. So I think in my mind I was trying to pick either the steeda or h&r. I wanted to go h&r so I can drop the hell out of it, but the simple fact is with h&r, I would need c&c plates, bump and stear kit, and new shocks/struts. Which is a lot more than I can spend right now.
 

superstang01

Active Member
Oct 11, 2006
448
9
29
Kingston, On, Canada
May 8, 2007
#8
  • May 8, 2007
  • #8
streethorse said:
Im just backing up what a couple of people have said.... On my 04 gt.....
Pro Kit, hard top, front drop= 3 quarter inch
rear drop= 1 inch

Reused all isolaters, no cc plates, no alignment as of yet.... I have seen no signs
of abnormal tire wear after 7 weeks.
Click to expand...


i have the same car but an 01 and i got just over an inch of drop all around and i have no allignment ,and perfect tire wear still to
 

fatboy02gt

New Member
Mar 26, 2007
0
0
2
easton, pa
May 8, 2007
#9
  • May 8, 2007
  • #9
ok hear you go.. eibach pro on a 02 vert. seems to sit a little lower in the front than the rear but like said above each car is diff.

car rides and handles great with this setup.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
May 8, 2007
#10
  • May 8, 2007
  • #10
krispy521 said:
Thank you guys for all you help. I finally got a hold of my Steeda rep that lives across the street. He recommended the steeda sport springs. Of coarse he would because he is a steeda rep. I am afraid of the eibach rear sag that a lot of convertible owners have described. So I think in my mind I was trying to pick either the steeda or h&r. I wanted to go h&r so I can drop the hell out of it, but the simple fact is with h&r, I would need c&c plates, bump and stear kit, and new shocks/struts. Which is a lot more than I can spend right now.
Click to expand...

I would get progressive rate springs and not linear rate. I think Steeda's are linear?

This is my car with the Eibach Pro Kit



View attachment 386505



This is my car with H&R Super Sport springs

 
K

krispy521

New Member
Dec 9, 2005
20
0
2
May 9, 2007
#11
  • May 9, 2007
  • #11
Why progressive over linear? Whats the difference? I used to have a set of Steedas on my 94 V6 mustang. They seemed pretty good, but they where the only springs I have ever tryed.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
May 9, 2007
#12
  • May 9, 2007
  • #12
krispy521 said:
Why progressive over linear? Whats the difference? I used to have a set of Steedas on my 94 V6 mustang. They seemed pretty good, but they where the only springs I have ever tryed.
Click to expand...

Progressive springs are like almost the best of both worlds. They give you a smoother ride during normal driving but when you take a hard corner, the springs turn stiff automatically (like H&R super sport stiff, almost).

H&R Super Sport springs are super stiff with permanent poor ride quality but surpasses the pro kit's cornering ability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
94
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
640
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
315
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
D
What's it Worth? 2006 Mustang GT Convertable
  • doc0075579
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
0
Views
223
What is it Worth?!?!? Mar 2, 2026
doc0075579
D
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
714
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?