• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What will this engine give?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mellqvist
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2006
M

Mellqvist

New Member
May 4, 2005
10
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#1
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #1
Stock 1969 351w with Edelbrock Performer cam and intake, hooker full length headers -> 2.5" dual system. Edelbrock Performer 600cfm carburetor, MSD ready to run distributor.

What kind of power can I expect with this combo?

I've tried to search for this, but haven't found any thread about it, so sorry if its already been up.

Regards from Sweden!
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2006
#2
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #2
i would say you are going to have to carb up a little for the 351w and then 290 -300 ponies is around where you would be.
 

DJE55

New Member
Jan 20, 2006
26
0
2
Maryland
Jan 22, 2006
#3
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #3
Mellqvist said:
Stock 1969 351w with Edelbrock Performer cam and intake, hooker full length headers -> 2.5" dual system. Edelbrock Performer 600cfm carburetor, MSD ready to run distributor.

What kind of power can I expect with this combo?

I've tried to search for this, but haven't found any thread about it, so sorry if its already been up.

Regards from Sweden!
Click to expand...

What heads do you have? The 69 windsor with the 4barrel heads produce 310hp stock. I had almost the identical setup as what you described except for a bigger carb and a little more aggressive cam and we had about 380 out of it. It's all going to depend on what heads you have and if anything at all has been done to them.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2006
#4
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #4
actually the 69 was rated at 290 hp i believe
http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history_69_73.htm
 
M

Mellqvist

New Member
May 4, 2005
10
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#5
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #5
I'm pretty sure its the 4barrel heads, but how do I really know? Theyre stock but I plan to port them a little just to smooth up the channels from rough edges.

As the engine is now, it has a 750cfm Holley on it, completely choking it when i step on it..



This is what it looks like right now, I'm about to lift it out of the car maybe next weekend.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Jan 22, 2006
#6
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #6
Both 2 and 4 bbl windsors have the same heads. The 4 bbl has different pistons to give it more compression.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2006
#7
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #7
the 750 works well on the 351w you just need to jet it and tune it to your combo
 
M

Mellqvist

New Member
May 4, 2005
10
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#8
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #8
Is there any way to find out wich version I have without opening the engine? (I am taking it apart, but still)

So, what will the 4bbl version give? 290-300hp? Had hoped for a little more.

and the 2bbl?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 22, 2006
#9
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #9
danny clemens said:
Both 2 and 4 bbl windsors have the same heads. The 4 bbl has different pistons to give it more compression.
Click to expand...


absolutely correct.

in 69 the windsors were rated 250hp for the 2v version and 290hp for the 4v version. the only difference is the pistons, even the cams are the same.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2006
#10
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #10
the thing is that 290 hp rating was on the old scale of rating hp so by todays hp rating 290 hp is more then it was then
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Jan 23, 2006
#11
  • Jan 23, 2006
  • #11
2 barrel motors had valve reliefs in the pistons and the 4 barrel motors had flat top pistons, which increased the compression ratio. Thats the only difference besides the intake and carb. Your cam and intake is limiting your hp figures. Go with a CompCams XE262H and if you have a manual trans you can step up a bit higher. A Weind Stealth intake or a performer RPM will help for an intake and not lose too much lower rpms. If hp figures are what you want, go with a Vic Jr intake but you will lose some lower rpm torque.
 
M

Mellqvist

New Member
May 4, 2005
10
0
0
Jan 26, 2006
#12
  • Jan 26, 2006
  • #12
Ok, first thing: English is not my primary language so please be patient with my spelling

I wonder if I dare to put in a performer RPM cam kit and the RPM intake manifold without doing anything with the engine except that. If you understand what I'm saying. Just install the cam / lifters and the intake.

I've done a compression-test (I think its called that) and I got 12-13 on all cylinders (if that info gives you anything). Spark plugs looks good, no problems there.

Oil pressure and watertemperature is good.

The engine runs good and works fine! Do I need to do anything with the stock heads if I install the RPM kit?

Other than that the car is equipped with an FMX and 8" rear thats rebuilt for 400hp.

And one final question, will the RPM intake and a Edelbrock 1405 600cfm + 3" high air-filter fit under the stock hood?

I'm not building a strip car, but I want more power at the red lights

Regards from a newbie in Sweden


:SNSign:
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jan 26, 2006
#13
  • Jan 26, 2006
  • #13
you gonna have to make sure the heads are up to the RPM cam,its a decent sized cam, so make sure the valve springs arent too weak. I had the RPM in my 289 and was pretty good, idle was a little rough, but better then the comp 270 i had before.
 
M

Mellqvist

New Member
May 4, 2005
10
0
0
Jan 27, 2006
#14
  • Jan 27, 2006
  • #14
iskwezm said:
you gonna have to make sure the heads are up to the RPM cam,its a decent sized cam, so make sure the valve springs arent too weak. I had the RPM in my 289 and was pretty good, idle was a little rough, but better then the comp 270 i had before.
Click to expand...

Ok, I have the stock 69 heads, so I guess they wont do the trick? But I will buy new heads in the future.

What about the hood, will it work or do I need to buy new one?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jan 27, 2006
#15
  • Jan 27, 2006
  • #15
the heads are ok for your build (there are no 2v or 4v windsor heads, so quit thinking that), you just need to get valvesprings that match the cam. Keep the 750 holley and tune it, sell the edelbrock 600 to someone else. Go with the performer rpm intake, or a weiand stealth intake. The performer won't make much more power than the stock intake. Hood clearance will be close, but a drop base air cleaner should be all you need for it to fit. Horsepower with the performer rpm cam and intake, 750 holley properly tuned, and long tube headers should be around 320 hp at the flywheel, 360-ish ft-lbs of torque. It should be a good street engine with a broad powerband and good manners, while still packing a punch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
677
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
646
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
F
carb vs cam help needed
  • forango
  • May 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2025
forango
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?