• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

What would you do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike78
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
Apr 25, 2006
#21
  • Apr 25, 2006
  • #21
Here is a place to go to get a set of E7TE heads CNC ported and rebuilt:

http://www.powerheads.com/SB50.html
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
Apr 25, 2006
#22
  • Apr 25, 2006
  • #22
First off, you should find out EXACTLY what you have before you do anything. Decisions depend on what's in your engine to decide what's your best bang for the buck. You need to know what year your block is to help determine the compression height. No sense in stuffing in a nice cam and other speed stuff if you don't have enough compression (or other reasons) to benefit from it. Heads are a big factor here. I don't know the exact chamber size (CC) of the E7TE head, may be 60-63+ for all I know, and on a short deck block, that would be ok. However, on a tall deck block,that could hurt, more than help you. Pistons... thats another one. What do you plan on using? Re-using yours? Thats fine if they are salvagable otherwise you'll need to shop around for a set of pistons that will work for your budget and combo. Yeah, sure, forged pistions are nice and all and the racers use them, but are you a serious racer? Are forged or hyper.. really necessary? Certainly not in your budget, right? So just look at it that way and be logical. Cheap is cheap, but expensive is... well, you may have a nice set of pistons and not a running engine, if you get what I mean. Those two things are critical because once the engine is built, you cannot change that. Well, you can, but it will cost you lots more $$$.
I'm not trying to shoot a hole in the E7TE heads, they probably are good heads. But just about any ford head could be just as good, if not, better. I had a tall deck block on my 1st 302 and I had a set of '66 289 heads done up with chevy valves and fully ported. Cost was around $550 for the pair. Yeah sure a pair of E7TE were similiar but I was after the small heart shaped 54cc chambers the '66 heads provided that could boost the compression greatly without me having to change from my stock-type cast pistons that sat deep into the bore. After I got my heads back i took them to a local speed shop and put them on the flow bench just to see how they'd fair. They outflowed a stock set of E7TEs by 30-50 cfm between the intake and exh and totally out-flowed a stock set of 289 heads. (didn't have info on a set of ported E7TEs at that time) So i figured that was alright since I was after the smaller chamber size anyways.
Anyhow long story short, that engine was suppose to put out 410 hp to the flywheel and most of that engine was stock (totally stock bottom end) with a few aftermarket parts and certain collaberation of stock parts. It was more likely 380hp, i'm sure. Probably could have pulled 20 more HP out of it with proper tuning and possibly a larger carb. Now that was with 8.67:1 compression. Had I taken the time to re-do the lower end and choose better suited pistons netting 9-9.5:1, I may have been well into the 400's. IIRC that shortblock had possibly 15-20K on it as I pulled it from my Ranchero too and i spin it all the way to 6500 repeatedily.

In short- know what you got, do some research, ask questions, take your time and spend WISELY!!! And you could build a nice, quick budget engine you can scoot around town in.
 
M

mike78

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
80
0
0
Apr 27, 2006
#23
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #23
more questions.... I think that I will probably get the headmans for my car, I know some swear by the hookers but I can't $$$ them at this time. So which is easier, installing headers and tranny (I have to rebuild the c-4 in this as well) and engine as one, as seperate parts, or some combo of? the engine and tranny will hopefully be pulled not this weekend but next, if my garage clears. my only other hang up is the guy paying for my bug.....I am in "the check is in the mail" stage now...
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
Apr 27, 2006
#24
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #24
They'll go in preyy easily either way. The headmans are pretty forgiving. I would say installing all three (headers/eng/trans) would be the easiest as long as you have a load leveler on your engine hoist. The headmans work well because you can actually take a primary tube or two off to ease installation.
 
M

mike78

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
80
0
0
Apr 29, 2006
#25
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #25
wow, the check actually cleared. E7TE's are here, I will probably do a home port and polish, I have a old holley 650 to rebuild, looking at a professional products air gap mainfold, haven't found a rebuild kit yet. I guess I can't really decide until its opened up and I know what size -- .030, .020 ?? Is there a company that sells a complete kit for a fair price that you would recommend? I can't afford high performance yet... but can't afford poor quality either....
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
May 7, 2006
#26
  • May 7, 2006
  • #26
Actually I normally have my machinist pick the kit up for me. Under most circumstances (unless they are marking up the kits) the machinists get the best deals on complete engine kits. My machinist has the ability to add/delete or modify the kit at any moment and that's a plus when it comes to last minute changes and such. Call around and see. Don't worry about the overbore size just yet. Get the block to the shop and they'll let you know what size you'll need as well as the crank/rod bearings. In most kits, the price doesn't change with different overbores unless it's something out of the norm, like say a .050 overbore.
 
M

mike78

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
80
0
0
May 28, 2006
#27
  • May 28, 2006
  • #27
So far:
E7TE heads at the machine shop, $$$??
headman headers, 140$
procomp ingition and coil, 140$
holley 600, 35$
Engine rebuild kit with RV cam --204/214dur. at .050", 304$-- http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/289-...cmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33620QQitemZ8069391362
b&m trans cooler 40$
83? factory ford alum intake 15$
Should be fun... now if only I can get my %^$ garage empty so I can play....
Just thought I should keep everyone one posted considering all of the help and advice I have recieved. If you see any really incompatible parts listed please let me know, and thanx again, mike
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
May 28, 2006
#28
  • May 28, 2006
  • #28
RV cam??

Why not a mild performance cam to use with the ported heads, such as a 220i/230e dur @.050"?
Also, those factory alum. HO 4bbl intakes have terribly small ports. I went with an old 289 4bbl cast iron intake because they have much larger ports, back before I could afford an aftermarket piece.
 
M

mike78

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
80
0
0
May 28, 2006
#29
  • May 28, 2006
  • #29
Ported heads? if I am lucky. as life would have it, money goes fast -- the heads will likely be home ported, or perhaps just freshened up, and get some bronze valve guides. I will probably match intake to heads, but don't know if I want to do much more -- if I mess these up I don't have a fall back. looking for a second job to help finance the rest, riding my cb750 dino bike everywhere else, and it won't be long before the rains come back in force here...
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
May 29, 2006
#30
  • May 29, 2006
  • #30
The term "RV cam" is generic anymore. It's really loosely used amoungst those who don't know much about cams. Nothing wrong with that. The cam you're showing in your kit is the same spec as the Edelborck Performer cam and also the same grind that alot of other cam outfits also use. IMO the Performer cam would work better as a hat rack. See if you can upgrade to a 280/290 adv duration (214/224 @.050 duration) with .472/.496 lifts. That would be a much better cam and you can still run stock-style springs unless you want to pony-up for stiffer ones and should still clear the pistons by a mile. That cam is anohter common option with these guys selling these kits such as the one you bought from this guy. This cam will also make the E7TEs breathe much better.
If you're not gonna port the E7TEs, that's fine. At least put 351W valves or a little larger (1.94/1.60 max without bowl reworking). Shouldn't be that much extra since a typical head rebuild requires re-grinding the seats and the valves are usually trashed anyways.
The Procomp Ignition probably wasn't really necessary at this time but certainly beneficial later on when you had extra cash. The stock duraspark with a hotter Mallory/Accel/Msd coil would have been just fine along with a good set of plug wires.
I agree with Blue Thunder. The '83 4bbl intake is more or less worth its weight in aluminum. If it all you got, than it'll have to do. However, he's right about the '66-'72 289/302 cast iron 4bbl intake, it's a much better unit with larger runners and compares a little bit with the Edelbrock performer. The cast iron units are usually dirt cheap.
 

welder4956

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 28, 2003
231
97
38
Birmingham, AL
May 29, 2006
#31
  • May 29, 2006
  • #31
Mike,

Here's a good site to check out when you get ready to do the porting:

http://www.armstrong.edu/ron/auto/e7.html
 
M

mike78

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
80
0
0
May 30, 2006
#32
  • May 30, 2006
  • #32
how about this manifold instead? (don't need the polish -- will get the plain when listed)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Air-...cmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ36474QQitemZ8068075110
if I get this one, I'll just ebay the other.....

Welder4956 -- thanx for the link, the best I've seen so far and I have been huntin'
 

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
May 30, 2006
#33
  • May 30, 2006
  • #33
There's no doubt that the '84-'85 GT aluminum intake is not a performance piece. Its probably at max airflow around 5000 rpm. It one advantage is stealth...you could paint it blue and use the stock V8 air cleaner without cutting the hood. Good for a show car where you want a stock appearance but a little more that the stock 139 horsepower. You could probably approach 200 with this setup.

If you want a bunch more horsepower, the taller intake is required, probably with a hole through the hood for clearance and cooler air.

As with most auto projects, definind your use for the car (and sticking with it ) is the hardest part. All other decisions flow from the the use.
 
M

mike78

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
80
0
0
May 30, 2006
#34
  • May 30, 2006
  • #34
I managed to locate a cobra scoop awhile ago, I had planned on turning it into a working scoop, hopefully I will be able to close the hood. As for use, the car needs to be able to cross the country, as I have no idea where I will pcs to next -- other than that, my stang will take me to work when the weather is bad enough that I chicken out on my bike...
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
May 31, 2006
#35
  • May 31, 2006
  • #35
mike78 said:
how about this manifold instead? (don't need the polish -- will get the plain when listed)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Air-...cmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ36474QQitemZ8068075110
if I get this one, I'll just ebay the other.....

Welder4956 -- thanx for the link, the best I've seen so far and I have been huntin'
Click to expand...

That's a better intake. I've seen one of these intakes in person. Really hefty intake for being aluminum. I get the feeling that with the excess weight, you'd expect better quality, but I can't guarantee that 100% yet. I planned on getting one for my 351W in my truck, just haven't gotten around to it yet. Be budget minded. Shop around, there's noting wrong with a good used intake. I use to trade parts with other guys on and off the base when I was in the Air Force. You can land some really good deals. I've also bought a few used intakes off the 'bay' but i get my best scores at wrecking yards and swap meets.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
105
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
323
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
341
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
753
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
272
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?