• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What year Stang is this???

  • Thread starter Thread starter ratio411
  • Start date Start date Sep 27, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Sep 27, 2005
#21
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #21
is that a kit? its not a terrible job... look up by the windsheild it blends pretty well, but i admit the stock mustang line could have been carried all the way back.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 27, 2005
#22
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #22
67coupestang said:
is that a kit? its not a terrible job... look up by the windsheild it blends pretty well, but i admit the stock mustang line could have been carried all the way back.
Click to expand...
Not a kit.
Friend of mine wrecked his Maverick a while back and couldn't find the proper front end parts. He had a 68 Coupe that he was parting. It had a good front cap, so on it went.
It bolted right on.
The bad part was the body lines were way off on the sides.
He did a lot of work to blend them.
I caught the car on a bad day.
He damaged it again about a month ago and hasn't been driving it.
It has been in primer for a long time, but it did look much better with a front bumper and grille.
The guy is a pure Chevy fan and circle track racer.
He just happened into the 70 Maverick and decided to try his hand with a Ford. It is a pretty wicked little ride... 347 solid cam/T5.
Sometimes this guy forgets he is not on the race track.
I would hate to see his insurance bill.
Dave
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Sep 28, 2005
#23
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #23
That thing reminds me of the old Johnny Cash song.............................."its a 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, automobile".....................

Damn, now I will be humming that song all day long.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

Ford_Motorheads

New Member
Oct 8, 2005
73
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 8, 2005
#24
  • Oct 8, 2005
  • #24
ratio411 said:


I'm stumped...
















Dave
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's definitely a 68' Mustang frontend on a Maverick body. We talked about it on the Maverick Forum.

I think it's bada$$.
 

Attachments

  • mavstang25mt.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 90
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Oct 8, 2005
#25
  • Oct 8, 2005
  • #25
It also looks like Mel Gibson's car from Mad Max.
 

Ford_Motorheads

New Member
Oct 8, 2005
73
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 9, 2005
#26
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #26
That car is cool.

http://v8macht.de/max1.jpg
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Oct 10, 2005
#27
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #27
If you could get rid of the upper Mustang body line, I think it'd be kick butt. I'm amazed at how well the door and fender line up.

Something else sorta cool, but within the same family, I saw a '67 Falcon with a '67 Fairlane front end on it earlier this year in Florida. Even cooler, it had a 428 FE in it. Bolted right on and all the body lines line right up. It appears that the '67 Falcon got the Fairlane front clip underpinnings. It was dirty and the paint was old and it was the coolest thing I saw at the track.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 28, 2008
#28
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #28
Update...
 

Attachments

  • mavstang2_original.webp
    77.5 KB · Views: 91
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 28, 2008
#29
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #29
ratio411 said:
Update...
Click to expand...



damn Dave what the hell happened? and are you ok?
 

Attachments

  • mavstang2_original.webp
    77.5 KB · Views: 108

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 28, 2008
#30
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #30
bnickel said:
damn Dave what the hell happened? and are you ok?
Click to expand...
Oh, I'm fine. It was a friend's car, not mine.
He wrecked it twice, then sold it to a young enlisted Navy guy and he promptly wrapped it around a palm tree.
3rd time was the charm for this car.

It had a killer little solid roller cam 347/T5 that was apparently too much for the street.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 30, 2008
#31
  • Oct 30, 2008
  • #31
ratio411 said:
Oh, I'm fine. It was a friend's car, not mine.
He wrecked it twice, then sold it to a young enlisted Navy guy and he promptly wrapped it around a palm tree.
3rd time was the charm for this car.

It had a killer little solid roller cam 347/T5 that was apparently too much for the street.
Click to expand...



scared me for a minute there, i though that was your little mav.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Nov 3, 2008
#32
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #32
Nickel, that 69 Stang GT is looking gorgeous!
I see you are selling. I wish I had the dough for that.
I believe that the 69 GT Coupe is the only Stang coupe I have ever longed for.
Any other coupe just doesn't do it for me. I am a fastback guy.

Back in the early 90s, there was a 69 GT coupe that I worked on for the elderly owner.
I tried so hard to get him to sell me that car. He just wouldn't let it go.
I think the only time he drove the car was when he serviced it.

It was gold with a white top and white interior. 351w 4v power.
FMX and 9" rear if I recall... Beautiful car.

Good luck
Dave
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 3, 2008
#33
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #33
ratio411 said:
Nickel, that 69 Stang GT is looking gorgeous!
I see you are selling. I wish I had the dough for that.
I believe that the 69 GT Coupe is the only Stang coupe I have ever longed for.
Any other coupe just doesn't do it for me. I am a fastback guy.

Back in the early 90s, there was a 69 GT coupe that I worked on for the elderly owner.
I tried so hard to get him to sell me that car. He just wouldn't let it go.
I think the only time he drove the car was when he serviced it.

It was gold with a white top and white interior. 351w 4v power.
FMX and 9" rear if I recall... Beautiful car.

Good luck
Dave
Click to expand...

thanks Dave, 'preciate it. that's my baby, he was my first car and i've had him since 1984......damn i feel old. we're looking to buy a house of our own and being disabled now we don't have a lot of income nor do we have any way to come up with a down payment other than selling the GT. but i rationalize it as i'm giving up my first car for my house so i guess it'll be an alright deal, plus i have my 64,000 mile 69 cougar project to play with once the stang sells too so at least i'll still have a cool old hot rod to keep me sane. i'll also have a much bigger budget to start with on the cougar than i ever had with the stang. i started the resto on the stang over 10 years ago and just got it totally finished this summer. i anticipate that the resto on the cougar will go much, much quicker since overall it's a nicer car than what i started with in 1984 and way better than when the GT was at it's lowest point since i've owned when i started the resto. everything was wrong with that car when i started the resto, blown engine, bad transmission, numerous dents and dings and minor rust problems, the wiring was in bad shape and the interior was pretty sad too. i'd been pretty hard on the car up until that point because it was my only car for most of the first 15 years i owned it and a lot of that time i delivered pizzas in it......


i've always thought the 69 GT was a pretty special car myself. it was the last mustang to carry the GT name until ford brought it back in 82, it was the only year to have 4 round headlights, it was the last year for the 390 and the first year for the 351 and most 69 GT's came eguipped with factory functional-capable ram air. the hole in the hood in my car is factory original and all early GT's came with the same hood. ford had apparently planned to make ram air standard on the GT, at least the 351-4v and up anyway (i've seen a few early GT's that didn't have this hood and all were 351-2v cars) but for whetever reason ford cancelled the ram air on them, probably because of the shaker option is my guess. so that hood in itself makes the GT's special cars but there were so many firsts and lasts for the 69 and especially the GT i couldn't name one reason why they are and always will be my favorite mustangs
 

hhead

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
280
0
17
so cal
Nov 4, 2008
#34
  • Nov 4, 2008
  • #34
ratio411 said:
Update...
Click to expand...

That's sad...
Very interesting car. Like was said before, the lines weren't too bad.
I would have looked it over and taken quite a few pics if it were at a show!
 

Attachments

  • mavstang2_original.webp
    77.5 KB · Views: 98
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
98 Mustang GT dying
  • ItsMason
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
123
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 25, 2026
lenzgt
L
New member - being beat up by 2 mustangs haha
  • Roont
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
185
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
nickyb
What's Your New Year Project Plans?
  • Habu135
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
767
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Habu135
P
Electrical 2001 GT Overcharging
  • PseudoGT
  • Dec 3, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
253
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Noobz347
G
Rigid-back booster seat for ‘05 convertible - recommendations needed
  • grigor108
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
125
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 18, 2026
grigor108
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?