• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech

Whats in a name......

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frdmstang
  • Start date Start date Apr 16, 2005
F

Frdmstang

Member
Oct 25, 2000
41
0
6
Springfield,Il
Apr 16, 2005
#1
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #1
I must say first and foremost that I am thrilled to see SVT bringing out the next in a long line of hot mustangs. BUT.... I have a big gripe with the name. Think about it... Ford SVT Shelby Mustang Cobra GT500. Its a gimmic. Ford threw the Shelby GT500 name on there to sell cars. This car was not designed by or built by Shelby America. This is a Ford SVT product. Being a proud SVT Cobra owner, this car doesnt feel like the next Cobra. The only Mustang SVT should build should be the Cobra and it should be called Cobra. Its a case of badge enginering. When I see that car I see an awesome mustang but it feels like someone is trying too hard to get attention by throwing the Shelby name at it. It would be the same as Saleen going out of business and 20 years down the line Ford building the "Ford SVT Saleen S351 Mustang". Its not a Saleen and this car isnt a Shelby. I am not trying to bash Shelby, I am a huge fan of his products. I absolutely love the GT350's. Its like the 84 Mustangs with rocker pannel strips that said GT350,those cars had nothing to do with Shelby. Ford just threw the name on the car to sell more Mustangs. Same story 21 years later. The Shelby name is one that brings up lots of emotions within the Mustang and muscle car community. Dont cheapen it up by thowing his name on a product he didnt build. From a long time mustang fanatic my advise is to call the car what it really is... the next mustang from SVT. Call it the Ford SVT Cobra.

I would love to hear what everyone else is thinking. I have been thinking about this since the day I first saw the new car and something just didnt sit right with me imediiately.

Ty

Proud Owner of a 1994 SVT Cobra (Rio Red,Black Leather,26k miles)
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Apr 16, 2005
#2
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #2
Frdmstang said:
I must say first and foremost that I am thrilled to see SVT bringing out the next in a long line of hot mustangs. BUT.... I have a big gripe with the name. Think about it... Ford SVT Shelby Mustang Cobra GT500. Its a gimmic. Ford threw the Shelby GT500 name on there to sell cars. This car was not designed by or built by Shelby America. This is a Ford SVT product. Being a proud SVT Cobra owner, this car doesnt feel like the next Cobra. The only Mustang SVT should build should be the Cobra and it should be called Cobra. Its a case of badge enginering. When I see that car I see an awesome mustang but it feels like someone is trying too hard to get attention by throwing the Shelby name at it. It would be the same as Saleen going out of business and 20 years down the line Ford building the "Ford SVT Saleen S351 Mustang". Its not a Saleen and this car isnt a Shelby. I am not trying to bash Shelby, I am a huge fan of his products. I absolutely love the GT350's. Its like the 84 Mustangs with rocker pannel strips that said GT350,those cars had nothing to do with Shelby. Ford just threw the name on the car to sell more Mustangs. Same story 21 years later. The Shelby name is one that brings up lots of emotions within the Mustang and muscle car community. Dont cheapen it up by thowing his name on a product he didnt build. From a long time mustang fanatic my advise is to call the car what it really is... the next mustang from SVT. Call it the Ford SVT Cobra.

I would love to hear what everyone else is thinking. I have been thinking about this since the day I first saw the new car and something just didnt sit right with me imediiately.

Ty

Proud Owner of a 1994 SVT Cobra (Rio Red,Black Leather,26k miles)
Click to expand...

My thinking . . . who cares what they call it, could be named a Pinto for all I care, just bring on the beastie.
 

ellhef

New Member
Apr 5, 2005
9
0
0
Denver
Apr 18, 2005
#3
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #3
RedGTvert said:
My thinking . . . who cares what they call it, could be named a Pinto for all I care, just bring on the beastie.
Click to expand...

I tend to agree with RedGTvert here. The people are not buying the car for the name, sure Shelby causes a lot of emotions in muscle car fanatics, but I think most people will buy this car for the 450+HP and styling, not necessarily the name. That is why I would buy one. Like he said, bring on the 'Pinto' as long as it is a beast.
 
A

allie

New Member
Dec 30, 2004
34
0
0
Apr 19, 2005
#4
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #4
i think you need to think about more important things

Frdmstang said:
I must say first and foremost that I am thrilled to see SVT bringing out the next in a long line of hot mustangs. BUT.... I have a big gripe with the name. Think about it... Ford SVT Shelby Mustang Cobra GT500. Its a gimmic. Ford threw the Shelby GT500 name on there to sell cars. This car was not designed by or built by Shelby America. This is a Ford SVT product. Being a proud SVT Cobra owner, this car doesnt feel like the next Cobra. The only Mustang SVT should build should be the Cobra and it should be called Cobra. Its a case of badge enginering. When I see that car I see an awesome mustang but it feels like someone is trying too hard to get attention by throwing the Shelby name at it. It would be the same as Saleen going out of business and 20 years down the line Ford building the "Ford SVT Saleen S351 Mustang". Its not a Saleen and this car isnt a Shelby. I am not trying to bash Shelby, I am a huge fan of his products. I absolutely love the GT350's. Its like the 84 Mustangs with rocker pannel strips that said GT350,those cars had nothing to do with Shelby. Ford just threw the name on the car to sell more Mustangs. Same story 21 years later. The Shelby name is one that brings up lots of emotions within the Mustang and muscle car community. Dont cheapen it up by thowing his name on a product he didnt build. From a long time mustang fanatic my advise is to call the car what it really is... the next mustang from SVT. Call it the Ford SVT Cobra.

I would love to hear what everyone else is thinking. I have been thinking about this since the day I first saw the new car and something just didnt sit right with me imediiately.

Ty

Proud Owner of a 1994 SVT Cobra (Rio Red,Black Leather,26k miles)
Click to expand...
that sure is a big rant over nothing.
 

JAZ 5.0

Member
Apr 1, 2003
178
0
17
Houston
Apr 19, 2005
#5
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #5
Well this car may have not been built buy Shelby America but Carrol Shelby himself was part of the creation process for this car. As far I as I know, he was signed on for the creation of the next Cobra by Ford. I don't know what part he had, but whether it be design or engine I'm still thrilled to see the name back on the car. Shelby Cobra was the original; without it SVT probably would be nothing or worse not even exist (SVO for that matter). I'm not trying to bash SVT either, but you always have to remember where something came from to see where it's at or heading. I'm also sure that's it's also hype to sell the Cobra's too; although they have enough with the new body. We all know since Gone in 60 Seconds the GT 500 is more legendary now because people like to join the bandwagon. But I've loved Shelby's way before the movie came out, hell I love Mach's, Boss', CS's(California, Coloroda, & Country Speicals), Tornado Edition's, and even the Europa versions too. Those were all cool cars that give the Mustang name character, so I'm glad to see the GT 500 name be put back on the car for that reason, the reason of fans but not the reason for money like GI 60Secs. and I'm sure both reasons are a big part of it. Plus, the 330ci is the biggest engine the Mustang has had since '73 so it's cool to see a BB(in today's standards) in a Mustang and see the corrisponding GT 500 name on it.
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Apr 21, 2005
#6
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #6
JAZ 5.0 said:
Plus, the 330ci is the biggest engine the Mustang has had since '73 so it's cool to see a BB(in today's standards) in a Mustang and see the corrisponding GT 500 name on it.
Click to expand...

Technically not true. The 95 Cobra R had a 351.

This "Pinto" will be the most powerful factory Mustang ever, even more than the king of the hill Boss429.
 
0

05PhillyStang

Member
Oct 28, 2004
120
0
16
Apr 22, 2005
#7
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #7
I don't think it's a big rant over nothing. However, I think Frdmstng was just a little mislead. Ford SVT teamed up with Carroll Shelby to build this car, so there's nothing wrong with his name on it. If he had nothing to do with it, as Frdmstng was lead to beleive then I'd have to agree that it shouldn't be called a Shelby.

To the above poster who said that people don't buy cars for the name, I'd have to disagree. While people like those on this site will look at the engine power, etc as the determining factor, I gaurantee you that there are people out there who will buy a "Shelby" just so they can say, "I drive a Shelby." It's all about marketing
 

JAZ 5.0

Member
Apr 1, 2003
178
0
17
Houston
Apr 22, 2005
#8
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #8
RedGTvert said:
Technically not true. The 95 Cobra R had a 351.

This "Pinto" will be the most powerful factory Mustang ever, even more than the king of the hill Boss429.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected. To bad there were only 250 made though

And I'm not sure what you meant with the Pinto comment. Are you talking about the II's?
 

eric n

Founding Member
Jul 14, 2001
875
2
19
Bakersfield, CA
Apr 24, 2005
#9
  • Apr 24, 2005
  • #9
Well, I'm buying one!!! Got a deposit down and I'm #1 on my list, assuming my dealership isn't just blowing smoke up my arse.

I am absolutely buying the car for the looks and power and for the handling capabilities, that svt is claiming it has. If it was called a shelby and only had a slick hood and 340hp, I wouldn't dream of giving them 40k+ for it.

That said, I love saying, "I can't wait til I get my SHELBY! I hope it comes to pass that Caroll Shelby had a fair amount of input on this car. That would give me great satisfaction. As it is, I will still refer to it as my shelby. And 20 years from now when my son graduates, he will get dad's SHELBY.

Am I a sucker for marketing, not usually, but I'm ok with being a sucker this time. This damn Car gives me wood!
 
F

further

New Member
Apr 26, 2005
2
0
0
Apr 26, 2005
#10
  • Apr 26, 2005
  • #10
so then y do mustang owners have a problem with the charger name
 

project91

New Member
Mar 6, 2004
101
1
0
Apr 26, 2005
#11
  • Apr 26, 2005
  • #11
i wouldnt put Carrol Shelby and creation process in the same sentence.

maybe 40 years ago.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Apr 27, 2005
#12
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #12
Frdmstang said:
I must say first and foremost that I am thrilled to see SVT bringing out the next in a long line of hot mustangs. BUT.... I have a big gripe with the name. Think about it... Ford SVT Shelby Mustang Cobra GT500. Its a gimmic. Ford threw the Shelby GT500 name on there to sell cars. This car was not designed by or built by Shelby America. This is a Ford SVT product. Being a proud SVT Cobra owner, this car doesnt feel like the next Cobra. The only Mustang SVT should build should be the Cobra and it should be called Cobra. Its a case of badge enginering. When I see that car I see an awesome mustang but it feels like someone is trying too hard to get attention by throwing the Shelby name at it. It would be the same as Saleen going out of business and 20 years down the line Ford building the "Ford SVT Saleen S351 Mustang". Its not a Saleen and this car isnt a Shelby. I am not trying to bash Shelby, I am a huge fan of his products. I absolutely love the GT350's. Its like the 84 Mustangs with rocker pannel strips that said GT350,those cars had nothing to do with Shelby. Ford just threw the name on the car to sell more Mustangs. Same story 21 years later. The Shelby name is one that brings up lots of emotions within the Mustang and muscle car community. Dont cheapen it up by thowing his name on a product he didnt build. From a long time mustang fanatic my advise is to call the car what it really is... the next mustang from SVT. Call it the Ford SVT Cobra.

I would love to hear what everyone else is thinking. I have been thinking about this since the day I first saw the new car and something just didnt sit right with me imediiately.

Ty

Proud Owner of a 1994 SVT Cobra (Rio Red,Black Leather,26k miles)
Click to expand...
Mr pround Cobra owner, and where did the name Cobra come from - give you a clue it wasn't a Mustang.

It was of course the AC/Shelby Cobra based on the AC Ace platform with a Ford V8. Creation of Mr Carrol Shelby after he left Aston Martin.


So by means of coincidence your Cobra is as much attributed to Shelby as any Mustang also named Shelby.
 

JAZ 5.0

Member
Apr 1, 2003
178
0
17
Houston
Apr 29, 2005
#13
  • Apr 29, 2005
  • #13
project91 said:
i wouldnt put Carrol Shelby and creation process in the same sentence.

maybe 40 years ago.
Click to expand...

Well I would, and so would SVT. Or maybe I should of said "unique collaboration between performance car legend Carroll Shelby and Ford SVT." according to SVT's WEBSITE Shelby had a hand on the ball for the creation of this car.
 
S

ShastaMcNasty

New Member
Apr 29, 2005
2
0
0
Apr 29, 2005
#14
  • Apr 29, 2005
  • #14
When we had it in the shop here at ArvinMeritor we (including ford employees) called it the cobra. And this was less than a week ago when it left.
 

Reimann

Puss > me
Jun 16, 2003
2
3
59
Wherever I May Roam
May 6, 2005
#15
  • May 6, 2005
  • #15
Frdmstang said:
I must say first and foremost that I am thrilled to see SVT bringing out the next in a long line of hot mustangs. BUT.... I have a big gripe with the name. Think about it... Ford SVT Shelby Mustang Cobra GT500. Its a gimmic. Ford threw the Shelby GT500 name on there to sell cars. This car was not designed by or built by Shelby America. This is a Ford SVT product. Being a proud SVT Cobra owner, this car doesnt feel like the next Cobra. The only Mustang SVT should build should be the Cobra and it should be called Cobra. Its a case of badge enginering. When I see that car I see an awesome mustang but it feels like someone is trying too hard to get attention by throwing the Shelby name at it. It would be the same as Saleen going out of business and 20 years down the line Ford building the "Ford SVT Saleen S351 Mustang". Its not a Saleen and this car isnt a Shelby. I am not trying to bash Shelby, I am a huge fan of his products. I absolutely love the GT350's. Its like the 84 Mustangs with rocker pannel strips that said GT350,those cars had nothing to do with Shelby. Ford just threw the name on the car to sell more Mustangs. Same story 21 years later. The Shelby name is one that brings up lots of emotions within the Mustang and muscle car community. Dont cheapen it up by thowing his name on a product he didnt build. From a long time mustang fanatic my advise is to call the car what it really is... the next mustang from SVT. Call it the Ford SVT Cobra.

I would love to hear what everyone else is thinking. I have been thinking about this since the day I first saw the new car and something just didnt sit right with me imediiately.

Ty

Proud Owner of a 1994 SVT Cobra (Rio Red,Black Leather,26k miles)
Click to expand...

You think they would sell a lot if they named it the Ford Mustang Daffodil? Everything that isn't practical is a "gimmick." 450 HP is a gimmick. No street car needs that. It's all the gimmicks that make these cars worthwhile.
 
7

70snake

New Member
Jul 4, 2004
61
0
0
May 6, 2005
#16
  • May 6, 2005
  • #16
I own a 1970 Shelby GT500 (which if anyone remembers is just a '70 428 Mach 1, with body mods) so they can call the damn thing a Shelby "anything", and I'm O.K. with it. Is Carroll making BuKu bucks for lending his name to this thing? You bet! do I blame him? No way! Carroll is a shrewd business man, and as long as the car performs well, he will sign off on it. Remember the Omni GLHS?, sure it was ugly, but compared against cars of its era, it was a screamer. so it got shelby's approval. too many people believe that this car cheapens the Shelby name, but if he only put his name on the likes of the GR-1, he would truly be selling out, to those he holds so dear... the budget minded racers, the working man who likes to work on his own ride, be it at the race track or cruising the streets, Anyone who has ever talked to the man will tell you, he's about as down to earth as they come. So bring it on, what ever it's called, my '70 needs a stable mate.
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
May 6, 2005
#17
  • May 6, 2005
  • #17
eric n said:
Well, I'm buying one!!! Got a deposit down and I'm #1 on my list, assuming my dealership isn't just blowing smoke up my arse.

I am absolutely buying the car for the looks and power and for the handling capabilities, that svt is claiming it has. If it was called a shelby and only had a slick hood and 340hp, I wouldn't dream of giving them 40k+ for it.

That said, I love saying, "I can't wait til I get my SHELBY! I hope it comes to pass that Caroll Shelby had a fair amount of input on this car. That would give me great satisfaction. As it is, I will still refer to it as my shelby. And 20 years from now when my son graduates, he will get dad's SHELBY.

Am I a sucker for marketing, not usually, but I'm ok with being a sucker this time. This damn Car gives me wood!
Click to expand...

How did you get on the 'list'? I didn't think that anyone was taking orders for it yet. How much was the deposit?
 

eric n

Founding Member
Jul 14, 2001
875
2
19
Bakersfield, CA
May 9, 2005
#18
  • May 9, 2005
  • #18
RGS0907 said:
How did you get on the 'list'? I didn't think that anyone was taking orders for it yet. How much was the deposit?
Click to expand...

When the car first made it's first auto show appearance, I went to my local ford dealership 3 times, before I could convince them to take 1000 deposit for the first shelby in Bakersfield to be sold to me at msrp.

It is my plan to stop by in the next couple of weeks (buying a new house right now and it's taking all of my time) and have a sit down with the sales manager and write up something more formal than the reciept that I currently have. I'm also planning on dropping another 9k down just to emphasize my seriousness. For this I want their word WRITTEN that I'm the first one in my city. THAT WOULD BE NICE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
For Sale 1993 Mustang SVT Cobra - Black - 5 Speed - 88k Miles - Single Owner
  • Buddy Jake
  • Jun 16, 2026
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
258
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 20, 2026
Habu135
SOLD BringaTrailer - 1993 SVT Cobra - Original Owner - 4,737 miles
  • mach1
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
722
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 17, 2025
mach1
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Sunday at 5:40 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
56
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 5:40 PM
AeroCoupe
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
194
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?