• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

Whats quicker? Mach1/2001 Cobra

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mach428
  • Start date Start date Dec 21, 2003
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 4 of 8 Next Last
C

carsnbeer

Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
145
0
0
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Jan 2, 2004
#61
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #61
<------------------PLEASE
 
I

isdnmatt

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2001
368
0
0
Smithtown, NY
Jan 2, 2004
#62
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #62
The Mach I is just Ford putting the same parts in a different arrangement.

I'm just getting tired of putting new parts on the Cobra, and then quickly placing them on a GT or V6 the next year. (ie 01 wheels ----> GT and 01 hood ----> V6) Had to swap out both my wheels and hood once I heard that crap was going on.

see sig for power.
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Jan 2, 2004
#63
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #63
isdnmatt said:
The Mach I is just Ford putting the same parts in a different arrangement.

I'm just getting tired of putting new parts on the Cobra, and then quickly placing them on a GT or V6 the next year. (ie 01 wheels ----> GT and 01 hood ----> V6) Had to swap out both my wheels and hood once I heard that crap was going on.

see sig for power.
Click to expand...

yeah that pissed my off big time with the 99/01 Cobra hood on the V6s. I could care less about the rims.
 

tfritz

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
886
1
0
SoCal
Jan 2, 2004
#64
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #64
I'm just getting tired of putting new parts on the Cobra, and then quickly placing them on a GT or V6 the next year. (ie 01 wheels ----> GT and 01 hood ----> V6) Had to swap out both my wheels and hood once I heard that crap was going on.
Click to expand...

Something is very disburbing to me about that as well.
Why market a car as one of your unique line ups then the following year put the same parts on lower priced models?


carsnbeer said:
<------------------PLEASE
Click to expand...
Why do you want to lock this thread?
 

Traveler

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2001
519
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#65
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #65
It bothers me to a degree about Ford choosing to distribute the hood and wheels to other Mustangs, but that is simply what Ford does. They empty their parts bins when they have surplus. Didn't they put some of the same aluminum trim and gauges from the Bullitt straight into the Mach 1?
What counts to me is the package. Anybody with enough dough can do a clone of a Cobra or a Mach. How hard is it to get the hood, wheels, chin spoiler, aluminum interior bezels, gauges, stripes, etc. and do a Mach 1 clone? We all know its quite possible, but its still a Mach no matter how much money you dump into a GT just to obtain a "look" and the same can be said of the Cobra.
Facts are facts and the Mach simply can not boast of a hand-built engine, it can't speak of the imported from Italy, Teksid aluminum block. It doesn't have the lower built numbers of the 01 Cobra nor does it fall under the SVT moniker. Is that important? Maybe...maybe not. The Mach is a fine car in its own right. Its a unique car that closes out one part of the Mustang's history on the fox platform while recalling a legendary name from the past. Its a great platform for the weekend drag strip go'er and probably makes a nice nice daily driver. They both have the qualities that we all love in V8 Mustangs...just with slightly different executions.
 
S

slither

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
276
0
0
south boston,Va
Jan 3, 2004
#66
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #66
isdnmatt said:
see sig for power.


2001 Cobra Vert. The Beast and I
311.6RWHP/305.3RWTQ (current mods N/A)
410.3RWHP/426.7RWTQ (70 shot)
# 320 of 3384
-=Current Mods=-
Steeda Tri-ax,SPEC Stage 2 Clutch,Steeda Quadrant and Adjuster,KB Super Subs, Jacking Rails, + Matrix Kit, Koni Yellows (all around), Ponyexpress Traction Off Box
Click to expand...

I have to say those are some impressive numbers. Are they corrected? I dont see any mods that will make the hp go up.
Damn, this makes me think about trading in my 97 on a 99-01. If it wasnt for that DAMN IRS it would be a done deal.
May just sell my car and buy a 99-01. Its either that, or my dream car, a TT supra. Thats quite possilby the only car I wouldnt sell, and Im about the biggest anti-import guy around
 

COBRA90GT

Mustang Master
Sep 22, 2001
6,654
0
87
HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Jan 3, 2004
#67
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #67
carsnbeer said:
<------------------PLEASE
Click to expand...


Not yet. This one has (somehow) managed to remain civilized. But I'm watching it closely...

Carry on gang...
 

Angus

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
1,001
0
0
PA
Jan 3, 2004
#68
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #68
slither said:
I have to say those are some impressive numbers. Are they corrected? I dont see any mods that will make the hp go up.
Damn, this makes me think about trading in my 97 on a 99-01. If it wasnt for that DAMN IRS it would be a done deal.
May just sell my car and buy a 99-01. Its either that, or my dream car, a TT supra. Thats quite possilby the only car I wouldnt sell, and Im about the biggest anti-import guy around
Click to expand...

It takes quite a bit of bolt-ons to hit 300+ rwhp on an '01.

I had:

JBA 1 5/8" ceramic headers
Magnaflow catted X-pipe
Magnaflow Cat-back
Steeda U/D pullies
C&L Hi-Flow Maf & K&N filter
WMS ceramic TB to MAF tube
FordChip custom tuned EEC

and my ending dyno was like so:



I'm assuming that he has most - if not all - of the same (type) mods on his car.

Note that the rwtq of my completely modded '01 4V isn't even close to the '03 4V with just a K&N filter?
This is (one of the reasons) why the '03 Mach 1's are consistently faster in the 1/4,
in addition to the better 3.55 gearing and lighter weight due to the solid axle vs IRS.

 

Bob Cosby

Founding Member
Nov 8, 1999
251
0
16
Jan 3, 2004
#69
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #69
It should be noted that making more peak torque won't necessarily make a car quicker or faster. It is more important to look at the average HP over the intended rpm range.

Example...as it sits now, my car only makes 291 lb/ft of torque at the rear wheels, yet with correct gearing, it makes use of the 314 RWHP it has to move it pretty smartly down the 1/4 mile.

I will agree 100% that the Mach 1 is quicker from the factory, and certainly easier to produce good ETs from the factory.
 

OleGrayCar

Special Ed
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,116
0
0
pullin' that draft, fillin' up your rearview
Jan 3, 2004
#70
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #70
Angus said:
It takes quite a bit of bolt-ons to hit 300+ rwhp on an '01.
Click to expand...

Ummmm, yeah ......... O.K.

In an effort to keep my reply semi-civilized, I respectfully disagree.
The sheet below is from our '01 with the following mods (a grand total of 3):

1) C&L MAF
2) Steeda UDP's
3) an outta 'da box generic DiabloSport chip



*- It might be worthy of noting that there wasn't diddle done to the factory exhaust setup, either........ that's right- 100% bone stock down to the tips.

**- The skittish on-again off-again path of the graph was later diagnosed to be a crapped-out EEC-V (replaced under warranty after this particular pull).

IMO, (FWIW)........ different cars respond, well...............differently.

Both cars are excellent examples of what Ford can do with a detuned N/A mod motor of less than 300 c.i. I think that they're aimed at two entirely different performance envelopes as well as two different market segments. The Mach is a pristine example of a straight-up, straight-line racer, while the Cobra is more adept at leaving vortexes of hickory leaves spinning in its' wake down a twisty mountain road.............. along with most competition.
I don't dislike either car and wouldn't choose the same one to win both a quarter-mile blast AND an 11 mile long giddy-up down the Tail of the Dragon, 'coz I think the results would be different for each encounter.

Each car has its' virtues- the trick is knowing which one you want.
 
I

isdnmatt

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2001
368
0
0
Smithtown, NY
Jan 3, 2004
#71
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #71
My car dynoed 292 rwhp SAE right out of the box. No air filter or anything. I have tons of dyno runs and the car was just strong out of the box.

Ive raced 2 Machs in my heavy vert, and both got taken to school. I'm not exactly stock, but enough to make up for the weight difference.

Matt
 

Firme

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2001
1,679
0
0
Sugar Land, Tx
Jan 5, 2004
#72
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #72
Angus, nice #'s

one thing to note however, is that even though your Mach 1 makes more peak tq..compare the curve of the tq between the two from 5k-7 rpm.... the moded 01 has an advantage on the #'s

one thing that is funny is, noone ever said the Mach1 is slower than the 01 in the 1/4, only that it is close enough to come down to a drivers race.
 

SVOKING

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2001
81
0
0
Jan 5, 2004
#73
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #73
Firme said:
Angus, nice #'s

one thing to note however, is that even though your Mach 1 makes more peak tq..compare the curve of the tq between the two from 5k-7 rpm.... the moded 01 has an advantage on the #'s

one thing that is funny is, noone ever said the Mach1 is slower than the 01 in the 1/4, only that it is close enough to come down to a drivers race.
Click to expand...

=more ricer talk....drivers race is another dumb "slang" that everyone throws around...lol, drivers race...lol
 
M

Mr.DOHCtor

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
46
0
0
BayArea, CA
Jan 5, 2004
#74
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #74
I hope you do know SVOKING that your Mach 1, although aluminum blocked more like a Maurader, your car DOES have 03 Cobra Heads, Cams, crankshaft, and 10:1 Compression, much higher than the Cobra. A good combination for mid to low 13's times. 01 vs. 03 Mach, yes the Mach is quicker 1/4 time wise. However, as everyone knows, its ALWAYS a drivers race. You could have all the HP in the world, but if you cannot get it to stick, you aint goin nowhere..
 

SVOKING

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2001
81
0
0
Jan 5, 2004
#75
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #75
Thats my point!! ITS ALWAYS A "DRIVERS RACE".....
LOL, So why bring it up every time another car is faster than yours??
 

Firme

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2001
1,679
0
0
Sugar Land, Tx
Jan 5, 2004
#76
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #76
SVOKING said:
Thats my point!! ITS ALWAYS A "DRIVERS RACE".....
LOL, So why bring it up every time another car is faster than yours??
Click to expand...



I like how everyone gets it except for you
 

Bob Cosby

Founding Member
Nov 8, 1999
251
0
16
Jan 5, 2004
#77
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #77
Mr.DOHCtor said:
...and 10:1 Compression, much higher than the Cobra.
Click to expand...

FYI....99/01 Cobra compression is 9.8:1 - only slightly lower than a Mach 1 engine.
 

Firme

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2001
1,679
0
0
Sugar Land, Tx
Jan 5, 2004
#78
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #78
here is a bad photoshop....


but its Angus's Dyno sheet.... see what I was talking about from 5-7krpm... peak doesn't do much
 

Attachments

  • compare.webp
    49.2 KB · Views: 211
M

Mr.DOHCtor

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
46
0
0
BayArea, CA
Jan 5, 2004
#79
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #79
Firme said:


I like how everyone gets it except for you
Click to expand...

Seriously SVOKING, lets not be like that. People have already stated, including myself, that the Mach 1 is faster stock for stock than a 01. And it very well should be with an extra intake/ shaker scoop and higher compression!

In regars to the 01's and 99's having 9:8:1 compression, 10:1 it makes a big difference even if only slightly higher. The only other engine I am aware of that has such high compression is the Nissan Altima, Maxima, G35, and 350 Z which I believe have 11:1 Compression. They are all the same engine believe it or not.
 
M

Mr.DOHCtor

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
46
0
0
BayArea, CA
Jan 5, 2004
#80
  • Jan 5, 2004
  • #80
t
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 4 of 8 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

J
Front neoprene front bumper painted color of my 71 Mach1 some hair line cracks
  • JJHstang
  • May 25, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
80
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
59
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2026
GOvert
G
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
258
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
A
Need some info on putting a 2002 4.6l in a 1997 gt.
  • Austin4.6l
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
145
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2025
Austin4.6l
A
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
303
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?