• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Whats the best Choice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangerbanger20
  • Start date Start date May 10, 2007
S

stangerbanger20

New Member
May 10, 2007
6
0
0
May 10, 2007
#1
  • May 10, 2007
  • #1
Alright, I just got my first stang, which is a 1986 2.3L non-turbo. Is it better to do V8 swap or a turbo swap? Also, there is a strange mount on my engine that is curved up... i'll try and get a picture soon. Was wondering if it could be a turbo mount? if it is I may just go for the turbo, if not i don't know. I've always wanted a 5.0 to do up nicely. One last thing p) what about a header exhaust setup for the 2.3? and should I cut the cat backs?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
May 11, 2007
#2
  • May 11, 2007
  • #2
The engine choice really comes down to your personal preferances. If you like tinkering and changing things, and being just a little different, but going just as fast, get the 2.3. If you'd rather drop something in, and not think about ever again, get the 5.0. Both are strong engines. Up to 300hp, the 2.3 is cheap and easy, but 300hp goes a long ways in a fox body. hehe.
 

sleeper_inc

New Member
May 3, 2007
92
0
0
Regina Beach Sask. Canada
May 11, 2007
#3
  • May 11, 2007
  • #3
If you want a cheap header on your 2.3 N/A then use a 90's ranger header. If your state does emission testing then you want to have your cats on there, but if they don't then rip them off
 
S

stangerbanger20

New Member
May 10, 2007
6
0
0
May 11, 2007
#4
  • May 11, 2007
  • #4
bhuff30 said:
The engine choice really comes down to your personal preferances. If you like tinkering and changing things, and being just a little different, but going just as fast, get the 2.3. If you'd rather drop something in, and not think about ever again, get the 5.0. Both are strong engines. Up to 300hp, the 2.3 is cheap and easy, but 300hp goes a long ways in a fox body. hehe.
Click to expand...

I've always liked the idea of have a big V8 under my mustang along with with mods down the road, so I wouldn't never think about it, but on avg. what is the cost damage? I found a wrecked mustang with a 5.0 in it for $400 so thats not a prob with finding a cheaper 5.0. What about the turbo and other expenses?
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
May 16, 2007
#5
  • May 16, 2007
  • #5
stangerbanger20 said:
I've always liked the idea of have a big V8 under my mustang along with with mods down the road, so I wouldn't never think about it, but on avg. what is the cost damage? I found a wrecked mustang with a 5.0 in it for $400 so thats not a prob with finding a cheaper 5.0. What about the turbo and other expenses?
Click to expand...
How much money you spend really depends on you. Most of the parts used for both swaps can all be found at a junkyard - even some performance parts (ex. Volvo intercooler) - and that helps keep costs down. As far a 2.3 exhaust, search for "exhaust" and you'll find plenty of videos, setups, etc.
 

onebad7up

Member
Jun 21, 2004
97
0
6
Nashville
May 16, 2007
#6
  • May 16, 2007
  • #6
They are both fun but they can both be costly. I feel the 2.3 is easier because there is alot of room in the engine compartment to work on the motor. The 5.0 is strong, dependable and has a lot of aftermarket parts. Aftermarket 2.3 parts get very expensive.

IMO, either route is a good choice. I love the 2.3T but I also love the 5.0....so it is just up to you.
 
F

Fuzzylogic

New Member
May 8, 2005
42
0
0
Albany, OR
May 16, 2007
#7
  • May 16, 2007
  • #7
I'm in the same boat.

My thought? Go with the 2.3T. Learn your car, do some work on the chassis, tweak that little 2.3L and have fun with the turbo, etc. The experience will only help you down the road if you decide to swap in a 5.0 and get into forced induction.

Unless you already have a complete understanding of all those things, which I don't. I'm just going to start at the beginning, and that means a 2.3T.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
May 16, 2007
#8
  • May 16, 2007
  • #8
hell, if you can get a whole 5.0 parts car for 400 get that, you can at least sell it and double your money when you part it out. you can get 400 easy for the motor alone
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
585
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
539
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
291
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?