• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

whats the lightest prdouction Mustang ever made?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen4785
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2004

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
Aug 10, 2004
#1
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #1
whats the lightest prdouction Mustang ever made?
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 10, 2004
#2
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #2
Probably a Mustang II. Hybrid between a Maveric and a damned Pinto.
 
M

mr-fixit

Founding Member
Jul 19, 1999
466
0
17
Malvern,Pa.
Aug 10, 2004
#3
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #3
I think it would be a 65 coupe with the 170 engine and 3 speed manual.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 10, 2004
#4
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #4
mr-fixit said:
I think it would be a 65 coupe with the 170 engine and 3 speed manual.
Click to expand...



Maybe, but those cracker box Mustang II's with a 4 cylinder and lightened up for fuel economy might take it. I don't have the actual numbers, but my future father in law and I once picked the back of one up with 2 girls inside.
 
M

mr-fixit

Founding Member
Jul 19, 1999
466
0
17
Malvern,Pa.
Aug 10, 2004
#5
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #5
From what I remember, those Mustang II's were all overweight, over 3,000 lbs. Even the '79 up coupe with the 4 cyl was lighter.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 10, 2004
#6
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #6
mr-fixit said:
From what I remember, those Mustang II's were all overweight, over 3,000 lbs. Even the '79 up coupe with the 4 cyl was lighter.
Click to expand...


Could be. I'm guessing here. Do you have any info on the wheel base?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 10, 2004
#7
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #7
According to the Mustang Redbook, the 65-66 Stang with a 289 was 2860 lbs. The 74-78 Stang II was 3290 with a 302. So it only stands to reason that the 65 with a 170 six and either a C-4 or a Toploader 3 speed would have been even lighter than a 4 cylinder Stang II.
 

XStang302x

Founding Member
Nov 2, 2000
286
24
19
Marietta, GA
Aug 10, 2004
#8
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #8
What about the SVO's?

-Frank
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Aug 10, 2004
#9
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #9
Sorry Hijack in process..

I can't find the weight of my car anywhere. What would a 69 mach1 with 351 Windsor weigh D. Hearne??
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 10, 2004
#10
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #10
Depends on the tranny and if you have a/c, but my guess would be about 3200-3400 lbs.
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Aug 10, 2004
#11
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #11
mr-fixit said:
I think it would be a 65 coupe with the 170 engine and 3 speed manual.
Click to expand...

That's my bet.

XStang302x said:
What about the SVO's?

-Frank
Click to expand...

While they (and other foxes) were pretty light in general, I would think it being a hatch would probably make it heavier.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 10, 2004
#12
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #12
Max Power said:
Depends on the tranny and if you have a/c, but my guess would be about 3200-3400 lbs.
Click to expand...
I tend to agree there, the Red book only lists the 428CJ for the weight on 69-70's and it's 3625. Of course if he lives anywhere near a public scale--- it's only $5.00 or so to find out the exact weight for sure.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 10, 2004
#13
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #13
i think it was a 4-cyl standard "stripper" 79-93 base notchback
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Aug 10, 2004
#14
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #14
yeah, i went over to the weight station and i guess they hadn't gotten many people asking to weight their cars so they just did it for free...

... but with probably 100 pounds of junk in my trunk, another person, and half a tank of gas my 66 with a 351w, C4, and an 8 inch came out to 3280 (1840 front, 1400 rear, if you wanna do the weight distribution), and I do have an aluminum intake but stock heads.

I figure that puts me at 3000 with just gas and driver, and down at 2800 car-only. Thats with the 351, too.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Aug 10, 2004
#15
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #15
How much did the first year Shelby weigh?
 
S

shelbyseven

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
208
0
0
alabama
Aug 10, 2004
#16
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #16
what did the 93??? cobras weigh? the car that they only made 200 of? no carpet,ac.p/w...etc.
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Aug 10, 2004
#17
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #17
My '65 coupes title says it weighed 2500lbs with the 6 cylinder in it. A 64-66 coupe with the 6 banger was probably the lightest Mustang ever.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Aug 11, 2004
#18
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #18
shelbyseven said:
what did the 93??? cobras weigh? the car that they only made 200 of? no carpet,ac.p/w...etc.
Click to expand...

93 cobras had just about every option available as standard equipment. They were not lightweights. The 95 Cobra R was relatively stripped down(no a/c, manual windows) and had a beefed up 351, but it wasn't very light either. I'd have to say that a 64-66 coupe would be the lightest of the bunch.
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Aug 11, 2004
#19
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #19
Nice to have comparison weight, Sad..

Mine was 720/600kg (1320kg, ->2910 lbs)

With toploader, 8" and 70 lbs of dampening stuff to make it a bit quieter...
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Aug 11, 2004
#20
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #20
302 coupe said:
93 cobras had just about every option available as standard equipment. They were not lightweights. The 95 Cobra R was relatively stripped down(no a/c, manual windows) and had a beefed up 351, but it wasn't very light either. I'd have to say that a 64-66 coupe would be the lightest of the bunch.
Click to expand...

There was an R model 93 Cobra as well.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
What changes need to be made to the brake system after swapping a V8 rear axel into a V6 1999
  • MARTYMAN
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
189
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
Mustang5L5
9
1994 Mustang GT 5.0 L Convertible
  • 94ns95
  • Jun 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
192
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2026
94ns95
9
M
4.10 gears = 200,000 miles ?
  • michaelleewebb
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
216
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
C
New mustang owner
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
135
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
Not a good look... FORD
  • TuFun
  • Dec 18, 2025
  • Video and Media
Replies
2
Views
174
Video and Media Dec 20, 2025
TuFun
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?