• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

What's the perfect rear axle ratio?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pompey
  • Start date Start date Jan 25, 2004
P

Pompey

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
7
0
0
Jan 25, 2004
#1
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #1
What better is there to do during a snowstorm than try to decide what is the perfect rear axle ratio for a car that I don't have and won't even be available for 8 months? Here are some numbers for cruising RPM and speeds at maximum RPM in each gear. Note that the 3.55 ratio with the 2005 tires is approximately equivalent to a 3.27 on the previous years 245/45's.

Based on 760 revolutions per mile (235/55 x 17)
--------------RPMs--------Speeds at 6250 RPM
-------5th@60--5th@80--1st-2nd-3rd--4th--5th
3.27----1541----2054----45--75--113-151--243
3.55----1673----2230----41--69--105-139--224
3.73----1758----2343----39--66--99--132--213
3.9-----1838----2450----37--63--95--127--204
4.1-----1932----2576----36--60--90--120--194
4.3-----2026----2702----34--57--86--115--185
4.56----2149----2865----32--54--81--108--175

Based on 820 revolutions per mile (245/45 x 17)
-------------RPMs-------Speeds at 6250 RPM
-------5th@60-5th@80- 1st-2nd-3rd---4th--5th
3.27----1662---2217--- 41--70--105--140--226
3.55----1805---2406--- 38--64--97---129--208
3.73----1896---2528--- 36--61--92---123--198
3.9-----1983---2644--- 35--59--88---117--189
4.1-----2084---2779--- 33--56--84---112--180
4.3-----2186---2915--- 31--53--80---106--172
4.56----2318---3091--- 30--50--75---100--162
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Jan 26, 2004
#2
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #2
There is no such thing as a perfect axle ratio. Any gear selection is a compromise.
You do make a good point, that is with the larger diameter tires on the 2005, it has the effect of lowering the engine RPM at any given speed.

But I don't quite agree with your #'s. For 235/55R17 I get 742 revolutions / mile (27.177" dia) . For 245/45R17 I get 785.3 revolutions / mile (25.6811" dia).
 
P

Pompey

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
7
0
0
Jan 26, 2004
#3
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #3
351CJ said:
There is no such thing as a perfect axle ratio. Any gear selection is a compromise.
Click to expand...

Of course, but then there would be no discussion...

But I don't quite agree with your #'s. For 235/55R17 I get 742 revolutions / mile (27.177" dia) . For 245/45R17 I get 785.3 revolutions / mile (25.6811" dia).
Click to expand...

Actually, I don't agree with the numbers either! I took the revolutions per mile using those called out in various manufacturer's specifications. The diameters and revs per mile in their charts do not agree using the normal conversion. I assumed that the revolutions per mile were more likely to be correct. Of course, those numbers also vary considerably for the same size tire even within brands. I'll be happy to edit the numbers if I knew exactly which to use. I'm not a fan of perpetrating disinformation.

[Going back and looking at the numbers, I probably exagerated the difference. It looks like the 235/55's run around 765 or so, and the 245/45's about 812, based on my highly unscientific sampling of specs. It occurs to me that the difference may be in the loaded radius versus the unloaded diameter of the tires.]
 

david97gt46

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2001
543
0
0
orange park, fl
Jan 26, 2004
#4
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #4
3.73 there is no better. good drag starts low highway cruising rpms, best of both worlds
 

BSRacing

Founding Member
Jul 19, 2001
88
0
0
Tamarac, FL
Jan 27, 2004
#5
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #5
3.73s on the new stang is like putting 3.55s on a 96-04...

Don't fear the gear... How about a 4.30s (GT) and 4.56s (SVT) on the new stang for all around driving and 4.88s (SVT) for drag... If you really look at it, is like 4.10s on a 96-04 GT and 4.30s on a 96-04 Cobra...

I had 4.10s in my 99 GT and could have gone with more gear... The best investment in my car period... I had 4.56s in my 01 Cobra... Best investment with the dry shot...
 

ZStanger

Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
311
0
0
Pity City
Jan 29, 2004
#6
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #6
I'd say 3.73's to 4.10's... Gets decent gas mileage, but can accelerate pretty hard when needed...
 
S

Sir Hacksalot

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2001
363
0
0
Ankeny, IA
Jan 30, 2004
#7
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #7
I was planning on 4.10's regardless

Hax
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need help with choosing a good rear axle ratio
  • Willybill32
  • Mar 10, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2020
Neuron
Head, Intake, Cam, Throttle Body, Fuel Injector, Compression, etc, Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Mar 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
22K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 4, 2007
Black1987Stang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?