• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What's up with my compression!?!?!?!?!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Apr 27, 2006

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Apr 27, 2006
#1
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #1
Ok, so I can hear my rockers. I freak out for a minute and then calm down. I take it to a local shop and the guy tells me that it's my oil pressure. Gives me a 20min speech about how the cam bearings and rings all crap must be worn out and I NEED to rebuild my engine. I freaked out at first and went home. I called up a couple of other friends and one told me to remove the VC and start the car to see if oil was traveling up to the rockers. I only did it on the passenger side, and it looked fine. So today, I take it to another shop for a compression test and I get this C1=75, C4=85, C5=75, and C6=75 I wasn't sure what it was supposed to be at but I knew those numbers were bad. The guy also checked my oil pressure and I was at 50lbs at idle. WTF could cause these compression numbers. My plugs were free of oil, my car isn't smoking, I have no power loss, and I'm clueless how my compression could be this low. Any advice?
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Apr 28, 2006
#2
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #2
OK, here are my thoughts:

I am not sure how much an ecam affects the compression, but I know cams typically can give lower values.

What did the other 4 cylinders test at?

Is this the stock bottom end? How many miles?
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Apr 28, 2006
#3
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #3
I am not sure how much an ecam affects the compression, but I know cams typically can give lower values.
Click to expand...

They can? How? The valve still closes, compression shouldn't change...right?


As to the original post...

You need to check your compression yourself. **** what the shop says. Buy a haynes manual for $15, buy a compression gauge for $30, and do the test.

If those numbers are accurate, your motor IS toast.

Test all the cylinders. The lowest test cylinder should be 75% of the best cylinder.

Generally, I'm under the impression that anything over 120 is "okay". Stock 5.0s tend to test between 145-155 from what I recall..I believe that my own car's lowest cylinder was 135 when I last tested it a few months back.

Good luck.
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Apr 28, 2006
#4
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #4
click on link info. on compression testing and do your own test as Swarzkopf stated above. wal-mart sells the compression test guage and hose for about $20...

http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/comp.htm
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Apr 28, 2006
#5
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #5
Actual compression only starts once the valves are both closed. If the intake valve stays open too long to better fill the cylinder then you have less gass to compress and therefore lower numbers.

Now it is also possible that the gagge itself was horrible and hence the need to know what the other 4 cylinders were. How was this tested? Was the engine turned by hand (single compression stroke) or allowed to spin on the starter until the pressure maxed on the gage (multiple strokes)? Remember the gauge adds to the overall volume of the cylinder by a very high %.
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Apr 28, 2006
#6
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #6
Actual compression only starts once the valves are both closed. If the intake valve stays open too long to better fill the cylinder then you have less gass to compress and therefore lower numbers.
Click to expand...

I've never heard this before...for all I know you could very well be right, but this just doesn't make sense to me.

Unless one of the valves is open when the piston begins in compression stroke, the compression reading should not change whatsoever. Is it common for an aftermarket cam profile to keep the intake valve open as the piston begins the compression stroke?

Otherwise, wouldn't the valve staying open HELP in compression as the intake stroke draws more air into the cylinder?
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Apr 28, 2006
#7
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #7
could your cam timing be off a tooth or more....
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 28, 2006
#8
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #8
94-302-vert said:
OK, here are my thoughts:

I am not sure how much an ecam affects the compression, but I know cams typically can give lower values.

What did the other 4 cylinders test at?

Is this the stock bottom end? How many miles?
Click to expand...

Very good point

Duration can bleed off some squeeze

Like you ... don't know if that is an issue with the e cam

Those values do look low.

Maybe the valves are too tight

Shims/different length pr's ... gotta love the peds

Grady
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Apr 28, 2006
#9
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #9
It was a multiple stroke test. He only did 2 on each side. The pressure would jump from 30 to 75 and then stay there.

Need more info on what you're talking about Grady, please.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Apr 28, 2006
#10
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #10
Oh, and my lower end if off an 98 Mountaineer(Explorer) and it was 67k miles when I got it. Don't know if that matters. Our compression ration should be at 8.5:1 right?
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Apr 28, 2006
#11
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #11
I think you are fine.

I would get a compression tester and test all 8 cylinders yourself.

Are the rockers adjusted properly?
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Apr 30, 2006
#12
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #12
94-302-vert said:
I think you are fine.

I would get a compression tester and test all 8 cylinders yourself.

Are the rockers adjusted properly?
Click to expand...

Not sure. I just tightened them til they were snug. I'm going to install new lifters with a friend, and he's going to check all of that. And what makes you think my car is fine?
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Apr 30, 2006
#13
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #13
if your rockers are a lil too tight, they could be opening the valves enough to bleed compression off
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Apr 30, 2006
#14
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #14
95snoozer said:
if your rockers are a lil too tight, they could be opening the valves enough to bleed compression off
Click to expand...

That could be the reason why this is happening. I mean, it's weird that my compression is so low when my car feels strong and is not smoking or burning or leaking oil. I may be leaving power on the table, but it still doesn't feel "slow".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Electrical Issues with my 2006 mustang gt
  • VerneVdV
  • May 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
114
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 22, 2026
VerneVdV
Y
Engine 1994 Ford Mustang Gt Rod Knock/Stuck Lifter
  • yaboity
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
282
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 8, 2025
AeroCoupe
Alternator not charging
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
109
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
345
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?