• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Where did the horses go??

  • Thread starter Thread starter toyman
  • Start date Start date Jun 11, 2009

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Jun 11, 2009
#1
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #1
I finally got onto a dyno and I'm trying to figure out why my tune isn't delivering the numbers I would have guessed. 274 rwhp @ 5000 rpm and 356 ft-lbs of torque. AFR avg 11.7 (11.0 - 12.3). Max boost 8.04 psi. Results are from a Mustang Dyno. Seems pathetic given the mods in my sig. I was expecting something closer to 350-375 wrhp and 400 ft-lbs of torque.

I'm at a loss as to where to find the missing horses and torque or am I just too conservative with the timing at 28*.
 

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jun 11, 2009
#2
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #2
I would have expected a little bit more, but I'm not sure how much more.

I hear figures from 5%-16% difference between a mustang dyno and a dynojet, it really depends on the dyno operator and how they run it.

For a comparison, I tuned with what I have in the sig minus the driveline components at 10psi (with a powerpipe) at 313hp 374tq on the stock longblock.

You have heads, cam, and a different style blower over me, and I have long tubes and 2 more psi. It's tough to compare these two blowers as they make the power at entirely different RPM's. I'm not sure of the flow numbers on those heads or know very much about that cam. Maybe someone with more experience with the KB can give some insight, but I still certainly would have expected a little bit more.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 11, 2009
#3
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #3
Auto trans.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jun 11, 2009
#4
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #4
Auto tranny vehicles don't dyno well on load-type dynos such as the Mustang due to torque converter slippage. You'll get better results on a Dynojet.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 11, 2009
#5
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #5
Welcome to the ego deflating combo of a MustangDyne and an Auto.

On a tuning note:

- I lock the transmissions in their 1:1 gear and pull from there. If you can datalog converter slip or at the very least engine RPM vs wheel RPM (the MustangDyne can do this when an RPM pickup is used) you can see how well the converter is doing.

- 11.7:1 sounds good on a 14.64-ish stoich wideband.

- 28* timing sounds fairly stout for 8psi on 93 pump.

For your combo I would be looking for around 400rwhp (265 * (14.7+8)/14.7). The correction on our dyno to local DynoJets is around 15% on N/A cars and a bit higher on blower and turbo cars.

Depending on where your 11.0:1 was at, that will typically drop you some power vs an 11.7:1 ratio.

I didn't see if you had any ignition mods, but as you approach 8-10psi or so it becomes important on the factory ignition system to have a strong spark.

Post the graphs with PSI and AFR -- we'll go over them.

Wes

P.S. Take it to the track and post up what it runs. That will tell all.
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Jun 11, 2009
#6
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #6
just wondering if you have anything else besides an off road H pipe? are you still runing stock headers and cat back?
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 11, 2009
#7
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #7
I wouldn't worry about it. I have seen SEVERAL cars first hand on one guy's dyno go mid 300's rwhp on mustang dyno and no change in mods hit mid 400's on dyno-jet. The are ALL different. Maybe this one in particular is conservative but I am convinced that comparing dyno numbers from different shops is as subjective as anything can be. Not to mention shops that inflate numbers just to gain more business.:Track:
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Jun 11, 2009
#8
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #8
Stanger007 said:
Welcome to the ego deflating combo of a MustangDyne and an Auto.

On a tuning note:

- I lock the transmissions in their 1:1 gear and pull from there. If you can datalog converter slip or at the very least engine RPM vs wheel RPM (the MustangDyne can do this when an RPM pickup is used) you can see how well the converter is doing.
Click to expand...

The rpm from the dyno closely matched the rpm on the tach which usually matches the rpm as read by the EMS. However, converter slip may have been present. The AODE and converter were custom built a week earlier but 2 days before the dyno run I had an issue wherein the rpms when in 3rd and at WOT just increased without a matching increase in speed. It was suggested that something was stuck in a solenoid that may have caused this slippage. The link is to Click Click Racing

How can 3rd gear slip? - Click Click Racing Forums


-11.7:1 sounds good on a 14.64-ish stoich wideband.

- 28* timing sounds fairly stout for 8psi on 93 pump.
Click to expand...

By stout you mean safe?

For your combo I would be looking for around 400rwhp (265 * (14.7+8)/14.7). The correction on our dyno to local DynoJets is around 15% on N/A cars and a bit higher on blower and turbo cars.

Depending on where your 11.0:1 was at, that will typically drop you some power vs an 11.7:1 ratio.
Click to expand...

AFR was falling through the pull. Starting at about 12 and dropping to 11 @ 5000rpm

I didn't see if you had any ignition mods, but as you approach 8-10psi or so it becomes important on the factory ignition system to have a strong spark.
Click to expand...

MSD coil, wires and 6AL box. However, I did pull the #5 plug to check its condition and discovered that the gap wasn't .032" but rather .042 ". Although there were no obvious signs of spark blow out I suppose the wider gap may have played some role in the numbers.

Post the graphs with PSI and AFR -- we'll go over them.
Click to expand...

I don't have a scanner but I will try taking a picture and posting it later.



P.S. Take it to the track and post up what it runs. That will tell all.
Click to expand...

I'll probably do that later this summer as it's a 2 hour drive from home.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What It Cost Me To Not Put An Ls In My Fox.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2014
CarMichael Angelo
R
2012 GT 5.0 Dyno Results
  • ribmaster05
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
6K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 5, 2011
StreetsideStig
Nitrous and a Roots Supercharger
  • sneaky98gt
  • Feb 14, 2011
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
10K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2011
Winters98GT
S
To V10 or not to V10 "6.8L" 2004 Mustang GT
  • steele6599
  • May 6, 2008
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
13K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 10, 2008
dastang2
M
Help! HUGE disappointment at dyno 324 Hp and 372 FT LBS. torque
  • MYSC351
  • Jun 1, 2008
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 11, 2008
cptkng79
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?