• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Where did you get your 302 long block and how much?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HistoricMustang
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2005

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 14, 2005
#1
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #1
If you have purchased a 302 long block where did you get it and what came with the engine (water pump, intake, harmonic balancer, etc). How much was the unit?

I am going to drop one in the Coupe rather that pulling and rebuilding.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
O

outlaw66

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
124
0
0
Flowood, Ms
Nov 14, 2005
#2
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #2
Historic,
I bought one of the Ford racing 345 HP 302's. It had no intake, but did have a water pump and balancer but both were for serpentine belts (WP runs backwards from a V-belt as you know). Had GT-40 aluminum heads and a flywheel. I was told that some came with flywheels and some with flexplates and that you never really knew what you were going to get. I find that hard to believe but regardless, I got a flywheel. I changed the front cover, flywheel and balancer and of course added an intake and distributor. So far, real happy with the performance and integrity of the engine. Cost around 3200 bucks and I got free shipping by truck. Bought from Powered by Ford on Orlando. Good people.

Outlaw
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Nov 14, 2005
#3
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #3
I got mine from an ebay auction. The builder's email is enginebuilder1@yahoo.com and his name is Darl Mamau. The motor is rated at 328hp and has Comp Cams roller tip rockers, a 268H extreme energy cam, 351W heads (with some minor port- blending) with screw in studs, hardened pushrods, guideplates an Edelbrock intake and is new from top to bottom as well as balanced and comes with a 12 month warrantee all for $2695 to the door. I haven't fired it yet but am super-impressed with the quality and service of these guys.If you email them with a question, it's often answered within the hour, even on Saturdays. I chose it because all the crate motors I saw except the 320HP, Y303 head motor from Ford (which is no longer available according to their Tech line) will not accept an early intake and were several hundred dollars more money for the same horsepower. That's important to me since my car will be using an original Shelby 2x4 intake.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 14, 2005
#4
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #4
Is this for your wifes car? If so I would not spend the money on a performance build, just use one of the Autozone/Advanced long blocks. They should hold up just fine for street driving and cost about half as much as the base models from FRPP/Coast/DSS/etc., take the extra money and spend it on the TCP coil overs we all know you want for your track car...LOL.

Just kidding on that last bit Henry!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 15, 2005
#5
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #5
I bought a short block(roller 5.0 for a 90's pickup) done by City Motor Supply in Dallas Tx. thru a local parts house for $345 (exchanged) It had Silvolite Hyper pistons and except for the cheesy timing set and overtorqued rod bolts, everything else was top notch. After dogging on it daily for over a year ( changed the rod bolts to ARP's) and topping it with Canfield heads, then reving it to 7500 for three months, it cracked a cylinder wall. It was bored 40 over. For the price they sell em, you can't come close to building one yourself.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Nov 15, 2005
#6
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #6
zookeeper said:
I chose it because all the crate motors I saw except the 320HP, Y303 head motor will not accept an early intake.
Click to expand...
Say WHAT? Sounds like you got a line of sold to you! I'd like to hear the story behind that bit of info.FRPP motors will take a carb intake, as will all
5.0s; what's the deal?
--Kyle
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 15, 2005
#7
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #7
5.0ina66 said:
Say WHAT? Sounds like you got a line of sold to you! I'd like to hear the story behind that bit of info.FRPP motors will take a carb intake, as will all
5.0s; what's the deal?
--Kyle
Click to expand...
I didn't notice that statement earlier, but I too, question it.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Nov 15, 2005
#8
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #8
I got a complete 1998 Explorer 5.0....complete with wiring harnesses and computers hehehe....50k miles....$200 :-D
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 15, 2005
#9
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #9
Edbert said:
Is this for your wifes car? If so I would not spend the money on a performance build, just use one of the Autozone/Advanced long blocks. They should hold up just fine for street driving and cost about half as much as the base models from FRPP/Coast/DSS/etc., take the extra money and spend it on the TCP coil overs we all know you want for your track car...LOL.

Just kidding on that last bit Henry!
Click to expand...

Ed B, funny..............I talked to a guy at work today who got a long block 350 from Advanced and he is well pleased. Paid $750 and only added water pump and throttle body. The 302's should be a little less expensive.

Yes, it is for the little lady's coupe.

Quick story, a few years back we ran two race weekends at Sebring only two weeks apart. As luck would have it, he blew his 289 the first weekend and with working 40 hours a week, etc he had to hop down to Advanced Auto Parks to get a rebuilt engine for the second weekend of racing. Hard to believe but he did finish the 3 hour Enduro race and kept the damn thing in the car for a few more events.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Nov 15, 2005
#10
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #10
5.0ina66 said:
Say WHAT? Sounds like you got a line of sold to you! I'd like to hear the story behind that bit of info.FRPP motors will take a carb intake, as will all
5.0s; what's the deal?
--Kyle
Click to expand...
I never said you couldn't put a carb on a roller motor or any Ford crate motor. What I said was that after checking with several engine builders, including the tech line (not the BS line!) at FRPP, they all told me the same thing, that the intake ports are different height and size and will NOT work with early intakes. If you don't believe me, then do a bit of research and you'll find that the X303 heads take a different intake gasket due to different ports. As I originally posted (you guys did read it didn't you? ) I intend to use an original Shelby intake made in the mid '60's and need the heads and intake to be compatable with each other.http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=2601 Here's the link so you don't need to take my word for it. These heads are the ones that come on currently available 5.0 crate motors, and as it says, not all intakes will work. I research stuff to death before laying out my money, and when 100% of the engine builders thell me the same thing, I think they know what they're talking about.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 16, 2005
#11
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #11
You CAN port match an early intake to work with any aftermarket 302 head. The reason for the different gasket is the different size port, they're somewhat wider and taller than the original small block ports, but not so big that the older intakes don't cover them. I'm using a repro 3x2 with Canfield heads on my 331 and it worked just fine and I know that the Canfield ports are similar in size to X303 ports. Besides there's nothing wrong with a slightly smaller port on the intake that's fitting up to a slightly larger head port.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Nov 16, 2005
#12
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #12
Thanks for the info Hearne. I suspected my combo might work, but when the guy selling it says it won't I had to take their word for it. I didn't want a cookie-cutter single 4 barrel, nor did I want to grind a rare intake to fit the ports. I'm also not going to race the car, so getting every last pony out of the motor at the expense of creating more headches wasn't what I was after so I chose the path of least resistance for the first time on this PITA car! Anyway, the bottom line is I think I'l be happy with my combo and I paid a fair price for it and that's what Historic was interested in in the first place.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 16, 2005
#13
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #13
zookeeper said:
Thanks for the info Hearne. I suspected my combo might work, but when the guy selling it says it won't I had to take their word for it. I didn't want a cookie-cutter single 4 barrel, nor did I want to grind a rare intake to fit the ports. I'm also not going to race the car, so getting every last pony out of the motor at the expense of creating more headches wasn't what I was after so I chose the path of least resistance for the first time on this PITA car! Anyway, the bottom line is I think I'l be happy with my combo and I paid a fair price for it and that's what Historic was interested in in the first place.
Click to expand...
If you want to port match the intake, Mustangs Unlimited sells a copy of your 2x4 intake for around $350, just swap the carbs and linkage to it. Glad to see there's someone else out here that's not been scared off by stories of multiple carbs being hard to keep tuned.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Nov 16, 2005
#14
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #14
I know what you mean about multi-carb set-ups being black magic in some people's minds. For the life of me, I don't know why except that some people never take the time to get them right in the first place. I've had several bikes with four carbs and about once a year I'd hook them up to a manometer to make sure they were still pulling the same vacuum. They usually took a turn of a screwdriver here and there, but I can't honestly say the bike ever ran any better. But I've always loved being different (not different enough to want a Nash Metropolitan or a Gremlin, tho) and think the 2x4 intake will fit right in the "look" I'm going for with my clone. Or maybe not...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 17, 2005
#15
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #15
With my now daily drive to work in the Ranger with the 3 carbed 331, I'm constantly amazed at how much power this thing makes, while using so little "pedal". Just this morning ( 3-4am) I was coming back from work ( deserted 2 lane backroad highway) and let her rip, giving it the slightest pedal, gradually and this thing EFFORTLESSLY will go up to 100+ mph and still not getting far into the secondary carbs ( or so it feels and sounds) I will hate to park it when the new 06 Stang arrives to take the Ranger's place.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 17, 2005
#16
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #16
Believe I am going to do the Advance Auto Parts thing. Will let everyone know how it goes. Thanks.

Happy Motoring,

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
B

BB1966

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
297
1
0
Beaufort , NC USA!!!!
Nov 17, 2005
#17
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #17
Bought a 88 Mustang GT,drove it home ,pulled the engine/trans and sold the body...total cost of great running 5.0 HO and T-5 trans ......ZERO $$$$$$$.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
964
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
667
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
843
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?