• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Which 28oz balancer for our cars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zero Signal
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2011

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 18, 2011
#1
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #1
I put on the balancer today and found that is was totally wrong. It's the Pro Products 80006 which is apparently for early model engines. My motor is balanced for a 28oz balancer, but I can't seem to find one that isn't hyper expensive. What reasonable options are there in 28oz for our cars?
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 19, 2011
#2
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #2
I thought they were 50oz. I hope so cause I beleive i bought this one when i got my new one...

1982-95 Mustang 5.0L Street Harmonic Balancer Kit by Professional Products at LRS - Same Day Shipping!

Man you have me sweating right now! I hope I got the right one I cant really remember lol...

Edit: Ok so I can't find cold hard facts on this, but this is what i'm seeing alot of with all my searches...

http://mustangforums.com/forum/5-0l-1979-1995-mustang/491328-harmonic-balancer-50oz-or-28oz.html
 

LRSjmac

Premium Sponsor
Sep 9, 2008
335
0
17
Hewitt, Tx
Aug 19, 2011
#3
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #3
Zero Signal said:
I put on the balancer today and found that is was totally wrong. It's the Pro Products 80006 which is apparently for early model engines. My motor is balanced for a 28oz balancer, but I can't seem to find one that isn't hyper expensive. What reasonable options are there in 28oz for our cars?
Click to expand...

The original balance on 1982-1995 5.0L Mustang is 50oz, but being your engine has been rebalanced to 28oz, you'll need a damper like this:

1981-95 Mustang 5.0/5.8L 28Oz Powerforce Harmonic Balancer Kit at LRS - Same Day Shipping!

Dont worry Jonezy! You'll be fine!
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 19, 2011
#4
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #4
Yep, stock is 50oz, so don't worry. That one with the spacer looks like the one I need.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 19, 2011
#5
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #5
I'd pay the little bit extra for the Pioneer one. I know it's a lot of money, but a balancer is too important to risk on Chinese Junk.

Kurt
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 19, 2011
#6
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #6
I just need to make sure it's the right depth and has the spacer for the pulley. Do you know what the pioneer part # is? Summit offers Saturday delivery from today, so I wonder if they'd carry the one I need.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 19, 2011
#7
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #7
I had a Pro Products balancer (Link LRS posted above) on my 347 Stroker. I called Probe and told them I wanted Romac or some other brand. They assured me it was a quality balancer and they wouldn't put them on if it wasn't. Well they were right, it worked well.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 19, 2011
#8
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #8
I'm fine with with Pro Products one. The build quality is clearly better than stock at least. This isn't an extreme engine. If the builder provided it, I'll trust his judgement.

Anyway, problem solved. I went to the builder today and he said I just needed a spacer which he had in stock. Worked out perfectly
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 19, 2011
#9
  • Aug 19, 2011
  • #9
One of the things I learned from Woody is to just make sure it's an elastomer style balancer. O guess these engines don't agree with the fluid style balancers.

Kurt
 

JonezySN95

Member
May 18, 2011
206
3
19
J-ville NC
Aug 20, 2011
#10
  • Aug 20, 2011
  • #10
LRSjmac said:
The original balance on 1982-1995 5.0L Mustang is 50oz, but being your engine has been rebalanced to 28oz, you'll need a damper like this:

Dont worry Jonezy! You'll be fine!
Click to expand...

Shwew! got scared a lil haha. I'm still a little worried seeing as how I bought the engine built already... I cant tell if there is any extra vibrations cause of solid motor mounts but I dought the guy went to that extreme with this thing. All it has is exploder parts and a decent cam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
607
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Stripped Crank threads and cracked Crank Shaft Ring at end (what is it called?)
  • 69machmike
  • Nov 13, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
335
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2024
89ripper
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
197
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
282
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?