• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Which front apron should I use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rusty428cj
  • Start date Start date Jul 31, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

rusty428cj

10 Year Member
Sep 29, 2007
943
265
104
Port Richey Fl
Jul 31, 2009
#1
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #1
Both of them will need some work before they fit?



 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Jul 31, 2009
#2
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #2
I bought a repop for $35 and took it to a buddy that welds, he cut out the size opening I wanted (just outside the license plate surround) made up a template and cut it out of some scrap steel of the same gauge and welded it in. In hindsight I wish we would have cut it at an angle so it would slope up to meet the top edge of the front frame rail so you wouldn't see it and the air would be pushed up to the coolers/radiator. Otherwise I really like the way it looks, I've got a small block so I wanted a smaller opening like the GT350's had I believe and not something too large.
Disregard the driving lights, I'm moving them to the grill as they're too large for my small opening and will block most of the airflow but that's the only pic I have of the valence on the car.



Of the 2 you have pictured I'd prefer the top one just because it has crisper edges like the rest of the car, the bottom one looks 'bubbled' to me. JMO
Jon
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Jul 31, 2009
#3
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #3
I like the first too, but a front 3/4 shot would help. The front spoiler can look a little out of place sometimes if they're too long.
 
D

doogie67

Member
Jan 24, 2006
69
0
6
Pennsylvania
Jul 31, 2009
#4
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #4
I like the second one. Where did you get it?
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Jul 31, 2009
#5
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #5
i like the first one...
 
T

Thetvirus

New Member
Jul 31, 2009
14
0
1
Jul 31, 2009
#6
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #6
The first one is much better, very sleek and good looking, the second one is like a ugly Eleanor one, very ugly, of course I don't like the look of the Eleanor cars.
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Aug 1, 2009
#7
  • Aug 1, 2009
  • #7
I vote for the first one.
 

garner67

New Member
Jun 30, 2006
68
0
0
SF Bay area
Aug 2, 2009
#8
  • Aug 2, 2009
  • #8
I like the top one, too.

Is it custom?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Aug 2, 2009
#9
  • Aug 2, 2009
  • #9
The first one thats black gets my vote. I don't like the second white one as much.

I'm not big on the Eleanor type stuff either. I also don't like the chin spoiler look on 65-68. It looks good on 69-70 though.

I really prefer this one that allows you to keep the bumper. This is what I would use if I changed mine.

http://www.mustangandfords.com/techarticles/mufp_0606_ford_mustang_clone_car_classics/photo_06.html

http://www.norcal-saac.org/listings/Mustang01.JPG
 

rusty428cj

10 Year Member
Sep 29, 2007
943
265
104
Port Richey Fl
Aug 2, 2009
#10
  • Aug 2, 2009
  • #10
garner67 said:
I like the top one, too.

Is it custom?
Click to expand...

It is a Maier apron modified. If I use it I will still make it smaller and I will have to blend it into the fenders on the side. This is what it looked like before we cut cut it.

 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Aug 2, 2009
#11
  • Aug 2, 2009
  • #11
I also like the first one better.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Aug 2, 2009
#12
  • Aug 2, 2009
  • #12
i would like the first one better if the chin spoiler wasnt so massive...I cant stand the huge chin spoilers...I'm going to go with a lower cutout on the stock valance thats wide enough to match the upper grill....I just dont like the super narrow openings...even on shelbys they look like someone just cut a hole in the valance...they look better with bumpers

p.s. i just now notice in your first shot you had already cut the lip down, so it gets my vote
 

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Aug 3, 2009
#13
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #13
I vote #1

If for some reason you chose #2, I call dibs on #1
 

garner67

New Member
Jun 30, 2006
68
0
0
SF Bay area
Aug 3, 2009
#14
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #14
rusty428cj said:
It is a Maier apron modified. If I use it I will still make it smaller and I will have to blend it into the fenders on the side. This is what it looked like before we cut cut it.

Click to expand...

I thought it look familiar. I've got a Maier valance that accepts a bumper, but the final product hasn't been installed on my car. You can't tell from these pics, but the body shop did a nice job blending the valance into the front fenders.

Here are a couple of pics...



 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Aug 3, 2009
#15
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #15
EP429 said:
I vote #1

If for some reason you chose #2, I call dibs on #1
Click to expand...

Your 68 looks great! Whats the color?
 

GONDO79

Member
Apr 1, 2009
57
0
6
INGLEWOOD,CA
Aug 3, 2009
#16
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #16
FIRST ONE!
 

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Aug 3, 2009
#17
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #17
tx65coupe said:
Your 68 looks great! Whats the color?
Click to expand...

Thanks, but I have no idea on the color, I bought it that way. It looks pretty close to Sonic Blue in person though.
 

joedokes28

Member
Jan 9, 2003
104
1
18
Photown, Az
Aug 3, 2009
#18
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #18
#1. The cut down chin spoiler looks great.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Aug 3, 2009
#19
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #19
rusty428cj said:
It is a Maier apron modified. If I use it I will still make it smaller and I will have to blend it into the fenders on the side. This is what it looked like before we cut cut it.
Click to expand...
I was going to do the same to mine but wasn't sure how it would look. Anything looks better than that goatee Maier put on there. It is too horizontal hence wouldn't do much in the way of aero, plus it just looks weird. It might've been cool in the 70s which is probably about how old their designs are.
 
B

Blue Oval Man

Member
Aug 8, 2004
125
0
16
Shaunavon, Saskatchewan
Aug 3, 2009
#20
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #20
My vote goes to #1 also.
I like how you cut that massive spoiler down to size, however, I would prefer if the center opening was a little wider and a little shallower.
David.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Hello, core supports for '86 vs '90-3, i need some answers if anyone knows
  • Pony Dr.Mike
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
7
Views
256
The Welcome Wagon Mar 15, 2026
95steedamustang
B
68 manual disc/drum master cylinder
  • Butchd88
  • May 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
38
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
Butchd88
B
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
193
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
210
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
D
Inner aprons next to firewall measurements
  • DamonFRANK
  • Mar 24, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Apr 4, 2024
BlakeusMaximus
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?