• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which H-pipe should I purchase?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trefty
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2004
T

Trefty

Member
Aug 13, 2004
117
0
16
Dec 3, 2004
#1
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #1
I'm looking to have a loud, aggressive exhaust. Currently I have BBK equal length short tube headers and a stock cat-back, although I'll be upgrading that in the near future(most likely with Flowmasters). I was wondering what would give me a more aggressive sounding exhaust, a BBK off-road H-pipe or a Mac Pro-Chamber? Thank you.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 3, 2004
#2
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #2
BBK
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Dec 3, 2004
#3
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #3
Prochamber, no question. But I don't know if it will bolt right up to your shorties.
 

C.Harris

Da Boss
Founding Member
Dec 20, 1998
1,850
0
0
Dec 3, 2004
#4
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #4
The ProChamber is a nice piece no doubt, but typically, an O/R H-pipe will sound louder. I switched from the ProChamber to the MAC O/R H-pipe and the exhaust note is more deep and throaty. While it seems I may have lost a little mid-range by ditching the ProChamber, I have noticed more low end grunt with the H-pipe. If you go the H route, I recommend checking out MAC's H-pipe...fit was great and they are using a better durablack coating now as opposed to the old HTS silver coating.
 

wht93gtEd

Active Member
Nov 11, 2004
0
9
29
Jersey Shore, New Jersey
Dec 3, 2004
#5
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #5
the ProChamber sounds nasty, like an X-pipe / H-pipe mix.......PM me & i'll send you a sound clip
 
T

Trefty

Member
Aug 13, 2004
117
0
16
Dec 3, 2004
#6
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #6
Thanks for your responses guys. I was leaning towards going the O/R H-pipe route, but I've heard a lot of good things about the Pro Chamber, so now im not so sure. Anyway, thanks again for your oppinions, greatly appreciated!
 

Funanin

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2001
356
0
0
Horsham, Pennsylvania
Dec 3, 2004
#7
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #7
for sound go with the H/X pipe because of its unrestricted design. The prochamber has a muffler type deal on it so it obviously will provide less hardcore beastness.
 

ram360

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
2,162
1
59
Pennsylvania
Dec 3, 2004
#8
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #8
check my sig.....I have some vid of my 88 with shorty's, o/r h, and flows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Keeping O2 sensors lit with long tube headers
  • keel
  • Jul 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
258
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2026
Qtrhrse23
C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
New Exhaust for 408w stroker
  • SadbutTrue
  • Sep 10, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
150
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 10, 2026
nickyb
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
800
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
R
For Sale 2008 Mustang Bullitt for sale Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 0S3
  • ROHDRNNR
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
346
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 10, 2026
ROHDRNNR
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?