• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which intake is better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SaleenSHO
  • Start date Start date Dec 15, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
S

SaleenSHO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
41
0
0
Findlay, OH
Dec 15, 2005
#1
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #1
I was looking around at intakes and the two I was thinking about are the Cobra (upper/lower) intake kit, or the Typhoon (upper/lower) intake kit. Which one performs better? How much added HP will i get out of it, and finally, how hard is it to install?
 
B

bcd

New Member
Jun 23, 2005
274
0
0
arab al
Dec 15, 2005
#2
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #2
i'd personally go with the cobra I've known people that haved used the typhoon and it seems like junk to me
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Dec 15, 2005
#3
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #3
What heads are you using?
 
S

SaleenSHO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
41
0
0
Findlay, OH
Dec 15, 2005
#4
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #4
Unfortunately the stock heads. I was trying to see if it would be worth it to get the intake on the stock heads. I plan on upgrading to GT-40p heads sooner that later. Is it worth the money running it on stock heads? What kind of gains if any will I see?
 

mrswivlepants

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
93
0
0
Dec 15, 2005
#5
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #5
You probably won't notice much of a difference. I'm going a similar route as you. I made the mistake of putting the intake in before I had the heads ready and I'm going to have to pull all the crap out again and invest in another set of gaskets. IMHO, wait for the heads to do the intake.
 

88GTtom

Member
Oct 22, 2003
198
0
17
Woodbridge NJ
Dec 15, 2005
#6
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #6
put the heads on first. i did your route once and really dident like the result. i wish i had done the heads first.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 15, 2005
#7
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #7
Intakes need to be matched to the heads, especially the typhoon, i'm told by the head shop (which port matches all heads to intakes) that the typhoon needs some serious milling and matching to get right. Says that what you save buying a knock off is lost in labor matching it up.

Cobras and gt40's are better quality, except if you buy a cobra now, and then add better heads like afr's or TW's the cobra will be undersized. I've been through a few intakes, because of combo changes if you buy and sell used there isn't much loss of money, but it's a PITA.
 
M

MatthewP

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
355
0
0
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 15, 2005
#8
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #8
I'd think about a Performer RPM myself. I've seen the Typhoon intake whistle pretty bad - not every one I've seen does this, but I have seen more than one do it. If you are really on a budget, you might find an Explorer intake kicking around somewhere.

From your two choices, I would probably take the Cobra.

-Matthew
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Dec 15, 2005
#9
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #9
Have Tmoss port your stock intake.
 

carbed87

Member
Jun 5, 2005
215
0
16
Dec 15, 2005
#10
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #10
yeah typhoons are chineese crap, i don't even know why people woud consider it an option.
 

timewarped1972

Member
Jun 17, 2004
642
0
16
mesa, az
Dec 15, 2005
#11
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #11
i'm in the same boat. i have decided when i buy an intake i'm getting a cobra one, for several reasons.
first, i've read many articles and threads that have said the typhoon, which is a edlebrock performer rpm knock off, can in some instances sacrifice low speed torque......although most articles say it works great abouve 2600 rpm or so.
so if you just have to put a manifold on now to try it, the cobra is better suited.
also, read the threads, magazine articles, etc, that cobra manifold is capable of making some serious power when it's ported, so you can definatly grow with it, and it shares the same lower as the gt-40 intake too.....
plus they are reasonably priced, a little more than the typhoon but, plus i think they look nice on a stang......just my 2 cents.....
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 15, 2005
#12
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #12
bcd said:
i'd personally go with the cobra I've known people that haved used the typhoon and it seems like junk to me
Click to expand...
Interesting...you are aware the cobra is being made in china as well aren't you? The typhoon is a great intake when used in the same type combinations that would benefit from an Eddy RPM intake. I swaped my RPM to my polished Typhoon and the gain loss was NOTHING..the typhoon just looked the part better for what I have going on under the hood. I also know several people with the typhoon intake...runners were really quite decent and NO fitment issues at all. It's really about you determining what intake suits your powerband the best.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 15, 2005
#13
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #13
carbed87 said:
yeah typhoons are chineese crap, i don't even know why people woud consider it an option.
Click to expand...
Son your confused...you need to be carefull when you say things like that cause I may just bring my little girl down there and red face you with my crap intake runnin car..base your comments on fact..not your "thoughts" in the tech section.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 15, 2005
#14
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #14
MatthewP said:
I'd think about a Performer RPM myself. I've seen the Typhoon intake whistle pretty bad - not every one I've seen does this, but I have seen more than one do it. If you are really on a budget, you might find an Explorer intake kicking around somewhere.

From your two choices, I would probably take the Cobra.

-Matthew
Click to expand...

It whistles because of head to intake alignment or the head port being smaller than the intake port. This is why i said it needs to be port matched and milled.
It's unlikely that the average individual could see or tell the difference. But as i said, the head shop said to stay away from it, he doesn't care where things come from, what's better quality is better quality.
Their balancers are also worthless, if you prefer your timing to be correct.
 

Curse

Member
Apr 8, 2004
791
2
16
El Paso, TX
Dec 15, 2005
#15
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #15
A lot of the people on this thread are confused. I am not only saying that because I use the typhoon, but because the typhoon has proven to make great power. DMAN is correct pick an intake for you application. I have stock heads and I think I would have been better off with the cobra intake. With the typhoon, I notice a power loss under 2500 rpm, like if the car felt heavy. I went with it because I knew I was going to get better heads eventually, so I did not want to buy a cobra intake then have to get it ported when I got better heads.
 

JSSuper455

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
197
0
16
UT
Dec 15, 2005
#16
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #16
Just for comparison sake... how would the TF Street Heat intake stack-up. My understanding is that its on a level playing field with EB Performer and Cobra intakes. Set for low end, idle-5500 RPM gains....
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 16, 2005
#17
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #17
Like with all it's all about getting the parts that work together in the same range. For mine the 2000+-6000 rpm is where the heads and cam really come alive so I wanted an intake that could flow enough to feed her throughout that range. The typhoon flows more than enough for most any N/A 302/306 set up, but it's a little large for the stock head/cam engines and may flatten out the bottom end, for a large displacement engine I would look to the Eddy or really porting the typhoon to ensure the max flow is there. Like stated I have run the Eddy and now the typhoon and I find the exact same results...no change in performance. The polished version gets all the attention when the hood goes up though..it was a nice addition to my bay which hosts an extensive number of polished aluminum/stainless pieces.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 16, 2005
#18
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #18
For a mild or unmodified engine, my choice would have to be the real gt40. It's been proven to work in so many situations.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 16, 2005
#19
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #19
2000xp8 said:
For a mild or unmodified engine, my choice would have to be the real gt40. It's been proven to work in so many situations.
Click to expand...
That is an intake I've been growing very interested in lately..some really good test results have been noted lately. I would very seriously look at the GT40 if I were to do it again, it really seems to work well across the board.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 16, 2005
#20
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #20
Another good thing about it, is that if you keep it in nice condition, if you sell it later, it's worth about the same as what you buy it for.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Explorer - Lower intake internal cleaning
  • R82148V
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 6, 2025
rednotch
For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
131
Engine and Power Adder Thursday at 10:31 PM
Habu135
Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
316
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
345
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?