• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Which intake on my 331??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95saleen95
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2004
9

95saleen95

New Member
May 31, 2004
27
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Nov 18, 2004
#1
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #1
This engine was built for the street but it will get a little time at the track. It has 11:1 compression a 550 lift at .50 cam with 230 duration. I am running a set of edelbrock performer heads that have had a considerable amount of port work done to them. My question is, should I run the trick flow track heat or go ahead and run the R series?? The R kind of scares me but if it will work I'd love to run it. thanks for the advise.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Nov 18, 2004
#2
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #2
I'd stick with the track heat or get an Edelbrock RPM intake.
 

canadian94gt

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
139
0
0
Debert, Nova Scotia,Canada
Nov 18, 2004
#3
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #3
I got the edelbrock rpm on my 331 and it gets my vote over trick flow
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Nov 18, 2004
#4
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #4
RPM II

or

HOLLEY Systemax

hands down
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Nov 18, 2004
#5
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #5
95snoozer said:
RPM II

or

HOLLEY Systemax

hands down
Click to expand...

I agree.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 18, 2004
#6
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #6
TFS R kills every intake listed in this thread, thats my vote. At minimum use a holley systemax, but my vote is the R.
 

krahkin

Member
May 7, 2004
183
0
16
Acworth GA
Nov 18, 2004
#7
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #7
With your setup, I would recommend a Victor 5.0 (assuming your are rev'ing beyond 6500).
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 18, 2004
#8
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #8
Trickflow intake manifold
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 18, 2004
#9
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #9
You guys are all gonna confuse this poor guy...Almost everyone has a different answer.

I dont have the RIGHT answer, but wouldnt an Edlebrock brand intake work better, since he has performer heads?

RC
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Nov 18, 2004
#10
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #10
Since it's a street car that runs at track...i'd agree with Zach.
 
M

mcvey90

Founding Member
Jan 24, 2002
950
0
16
B TOWN
Nov 18, 2004
#11
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #11
TFS R

No complaints about the R intake on my 347. That thing is a beast and looks mean to boot. I will never run another intake, bolt it on and you will know where I am coming from.

keep in mind you might have some hood clearance issues when you get into some of these bigger intakes, especially if you run any spacers.

good luck
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Nov 18, 2004
#12
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #12
I have had good luck with my systemax.. I think anything aftermarket will do you just fine.

AFM had an article about different intakes they dyno tested on the same setup and all of them were within 5 or so horse of each other, even the bread box intakes, with the exception of the systemax hehehe...

http://www.andersonfordmotorsport.com/media/intake.htm

of coarse not every intake was on there. And im sure with a different setup you would get different results from each, but that gives you an idea though how close they all compare to each other for the most part.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Nov 19, 2004
#13
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #13
Any 1500-6500 rpm intake will work great. I personally like the trick flow after installing one on my buddies 91 hatch. Great intake.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Nov 19, 2004
#14
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #14
The new BBK intake.
 
J

jetuomi

Founding Member
Jan 30, 2002
1,464
0
0
Toronto, ON
Nov 19, 2004
#15
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #15
I have similar heads to you and would TOTALLY recommend the rpm2 intake......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Surging/stalling! problem or tune?
  • djj62478
  • Oct 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
366
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 14, 2026
KRUISR
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
628
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?