• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Which mirrors to choose.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pakrat
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2005

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Jun 15, 2005
#1
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #1
OK, here's the deal and dilema. Right now I have an aftermarket circa 1970 chrome reproducton look a like of the color keyed mirrors that were first available in 69'. They are still servicable but showing their age. I had contemplated going with the correct color keyed ones but on a vert I have to say I really like the look of the extra chrome, it compliments the window trim nicely. So what are my options really? I can't find anything like my vintage aftermarket ones and I have to decide before I paint the car. I notice alot of the modified cars of various years going with the Shelby bullet design mirrors now a days, how do you think they would look if I want to keep chrome?
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Jun 15, 2005
#2
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #2
The chrome looks good, but if you're still going for the topless Mach thing, I'd go color-keyed.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 15, 2005
#3
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #3
i'd prefer the shebly bullets with the big lenses (talbot jr?) to the ones you have now. no offense i just think the chrome version you have is a little big and hokie to me. it works ok with the way the car is now (or was) but i think with the paint you are looking to use and the shelby glass that the smaller mirrors will look better. i have also seen quite a few of the big lens versions with the main body painted the color of the car and the chrome lens head left chrome, that looks awesome.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Jun 15, 2005
#4
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #4
bnickel said:
i'd prefer the shebly bullets with the big lenses (talbot jr?) to the ones you have now. no offense i just think the chrome version you have is a little big and hokie to me. it works ok with the way the car is now (or was) but i think with the paint you are looking to use and the shelby glass that the smaller mirrors will look better. i have also seen quite a few of the big lens versions with the main body painted the color of the car and the chrome lens head left chrome, that looks awesome.
Click to expand...

Well ya know I have checked them before and believe it or not the ones I have are the same dimensions as the color keyed ones. The only real difference is the neck pivots to give more adjutability. No offense though, I know my opinion, it's others that I am looking for. So where to find these big lense bullets? That's the one thing I was concerned about with the regular ones is the mirrors are so small, way smaller than I have anyway and those are small as it is. So if you paint the body does the chrome have to be stripped first? I have to say that sounds like the best of both worlds and may solve the problem nicely.

I have been leaning this was as like I said, I seems this is almost a restomod standard these days but I don't think I've seen a 69' with them yet.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 15, 2005
#5
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #5
there is a pic of the one i'm talking about in the link below

http://www.talbotco.com/pics/mir2.jpg

they also make this mirror in a "long base" version that is closer in length to the mustang mirrors. branda carries them but they don't have a pic on their site, i believe they call it the "MOCK II" the regular talbot jr mirrors are on backorder right now. i think most of the mustang supplers have this mirror, at one time i was planning on using these mirrors myself but decided on the stock sport mirrors, in retrospect i think it would look better the way i suggested you do these mirrors with the body of the mirror painted body color, oh well hindsight is 20/20
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 15, 2005
#6
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #6
ok i found them at www.cjponyparts.com

http://www.parts123.com/PartFrame.asp?ZTM=cadefeha&GHOME=www.cjponyparts.com&TITLE=CJ_Pony_Parts

it is the one that says

1965-1967 Bullet Mirror Shelby large Base ME3 54.95 Each

ok, never mind the link won't take you there directly, i just did a search for "mirror" and then it will be on page 3 it also has the long base i was talking about too.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Jun 16, 2005
#7
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • #7
bnickel said:
there is a pic of the one i'm talking about in the link below

http://www.talbotco.com/pics/mir2.jpg

they also make this mirror in a "long base" version that is closer in length to the mustang mirrors. branda carries them but they don't have a pic on their site, i believe they call it the "MOCK II" the regular talbot jr mirrors are on backorder right now. i think most of the mustang supplers have this mirror, at one time i was planning on using these mirrors myself but decided on the stock sport mirrors, in retrospect i think it would look better the way i suggested you do these mirrors with the body of the mirror painted body color, oh well hindsight is 20/20
Click to expand...

So are these talbot Jr. mirrors like the original Rotunda, that seems to be what is in most of my catalogs. I do think the original style is more streamline than the large mirror one but I need to have some function at least, and heck two are about the oprice of one 69' sports mirror. I do like the look of that Falcon you posted on the other forum especially with the charcoal/graphite color I'm leaning towards, that will look real good with the pop of chrome, maybe I'll get to correct your mistake for you, heh heh.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 16, 2005
#8
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • #8
haha, yeah my mistake, but i got a hell of a deal on the sport mirrors i bought, from ebay, got them for them for about 30 bucks for the pair, not too bad if you ask me.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jun 16, 2005
#9
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • #9
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 17, 2005
#10
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #10
those are the ones, Edbert.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
351
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Im baaaack
  • *HOOFHEARTED*
  • Jan 17, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
173
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2025
General karthief
Progress Thread Nicholase "lights out" build- TKX install
  • nicholase
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 26 27 28
Replies
542
Views
34K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2026
Mac131
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
843
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?