• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Which would be a better avenue of aproach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DallasJ_TSi
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
9

94blackGTvert

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2002
63
0
0
PA
Dec 7, 2004
#21
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #21
what would be considered a good price on a 69-74 351w for just the block out of a junkyard??
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 7, 2004
#22
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #22
If you can find a good W-block in a junkyard, chances are the owners/operators don't know what they have. Pay whatever they ask. If someone knew what they had, they could probably ask 400-500 bucks for it. Even then, I probably wouldn't flinch if I knew my goals were going to be met and that the block would hold it.

Joe
 
D

DallasJ_TSi

Member
Mar 2, 2004
54
0
7
Dec 7, 2004
#23
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #23
If I were to get a 351w, how would I know its a 69-74 for sure?

Also Ill look, but do you happen to have a link for a description of what is involved with swapping a 351w?

-Dallas J
 
D

DallasJ_TSi

Member
Mar 2, 2004
54
0
7
Dec 7, 2004
#24
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #24
One Wicked SVT said:
with swap parts, machining it to have hydra system and 1 piece RMS, it adds up... TO A LOT!
Click to expand...

Whats this Hydra system youre talking about? Ive done a search and cant find anything, and Ive never heard of it.

What type a machine work is involved with a 1 piece RMS (rear main?). Why isnt the stock one fine if Im probably staying with the stock stroke or 393?

Ive found a bunch of info on what is all needed for the swap, and the only thing thats disconcerning right now is the hood clearence. Im gonna try and search for some engine mounts that lower the engine.

-Dallas J
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 7, 2004
#25
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #25
DallasJ_TSi said:
If I were to get a 351w, how would I know its a 69-74 for sure?

Also Ill look, but do you happen to have a link for a description of what is involved with swapping a 351w?

-Dallas J
Click to expand...
Swapping a 351 requires that all the intake manifold and headers be changed due to the taller deck height and greater width of the motor. The distributor has to be changed because of the taller deck, and the motor mounts obviously have to be changed. I don't know anymore than that, but I'm pretty sure I've got the basics.

I don't know too much about ID'ing blocks other than the '69 blocks (the most desirable year) is a C8 and the '70 blocks are C9. When you do find a 351, check the number of bolt holes in the valve covers - Windsors have 6, Cleve's have 8. The T-stat location on a Cleveland motor is also different from the 302/351W location.

Joe
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 7, 2004
#26
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #26
DallasJ_TSi said:
Whats this Hydra system youre talking about? Ive done a search and cant find anything, and Ive never heard of it.

What type a machine work is involved with a 1 piece RMS (rear main?). Why isnt the stock one fine if Im probably staying with the stock stroke or 393?

Ive found a bunch of info on what is all needed for the swap, and the only thing thats disconcerning right now is the hood clearence. Im gonna try and search for some engine mounts that lower the engine.

-Dallas J
Click to expand...
Hydra system = Hydraulic roller. Wicked can't spell it.

Roller cams were not used back in the day - they used flat tappets. The lifter bores needed to be enlarged to accept a roller camshaft. You WILL want to do this if it's a race motor.

I have no clue what type of machine work is involved in turning a 2-piece rear main seal into a 1-piece, but I do know that it is cheap. With a 1-piece RMS, you have more support. Think about it this way - you have two semi-circles that make up the RMS. You stack them to that they form a circle in the back of the motor. When pressure builds up inside the crankcase, which do you think is going to give first, the 1 piece or 2 piece? The two piece will. There is seal is already "broken" (for lack of a better term) and the pressure required to blow one out is much less than a 1-piece.

A local guy runs a 408 in a Fox-coupe under a 2" cowl hood, and I'm not sure how big of a "drop" his motor mounts are. You will probably have to get some type of cowl hood to clear the motor; it shouldn't be anything humongously ridiculous though.

Joe
 
D

DallasJ_TSi

Member
Mar 2, 2004
54
0
7
Dec 7, 2004
#27
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #27
Ive found a bunch of info now on the swap. Alot of little parts are needed, but having 150k on the clock most of the parts are in need of changing anyways.

The 351 looks like it will hold the power I want, be cheaper than a dart 302, and probably not take any more work. I just have to have a few different parts.

Thanks for the help.

The search for knowlege continues.

-Dallas J
 
O

One Wicked SVT

New Member
Nov 30, 2004
91
0
0
Dec 8, 2004
#28
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #28
The main point is...

New distributor = $300 or so for a 94-95 specific dizzy.

New 351w swap headers = $350

New 351w "swap" oil pan = $200

351w intake specific= $120 added over 302.

These are ADDED cost, from when you add it up you can just simply purchase a R302/ new editions DART SPORTSMAN BLOCK for a couple bucks more. Which has lots of potential to grow to 1200-1400horsepower easily.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Dec 8, 2004
#29
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #29
the way i see, he's not really concerned a whole lot about the prices. its going to over time anyway.

go with the 351, and yes you will need to get a taller hood.

if its only a track car, i would call up keith craft and order a new turnkey engine. a n/a 351 stroked carb setup will get you into the 9s.
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Dec 8, 2004
#30
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #30
I always thoguth the Clevelands were better then the Windsors, no?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 8, 2004
#31
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #31
BlueOvalStangGT said:
I always thoguth the Clevelands were better then the Windsors, no?
Click to expand...
Yes and no. Cleve's are very expensive motors and often make too much power for the blocks to handle. I've seen a Cleveland with serious cylinder heads make 1100 horsepower on 15# of boost from a turbo. Crankshafts for Cleveland motors are a bit more expensive because they have odd journal sizes.

Nowadays, you can make a Cleveland out of a Windsor. The only thing special about the Cleveland motor was the canted valve heads. Blue Thunder makes canted valve heads for Windsor race motors. They make TONS of power. If you use them with on a Windsor, they bolt right up, but you'd need custom pistons.

Joe
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
0
In need of some advise!
  • 01slvrstang
  • Apr 17, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2020
AutodesignJohn
A
Progress Thread finishing touches on my stroker build
  • doobismaximus
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2021
nickyb
  • Locked
RANT!!! The circle of life..The car guy version.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2020
fox racer v2
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?