• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Why Cant It Break Loose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dubbsix
  • Start date Start date May 23, 2014

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
May 23, 2014
#1
  • May 23, 2014
  • #1
Still trying to figure out the gremlins with my 94Gt. It runs and drives smooth, has a relatively smooth idle and doesnt hesitate on sudden acceleration.

The symptom: Just feels like a dog. If at a stop light and i floor it.. wont break the tires loose.

What I've done:
New plugs
Cap n rotor
Scanned for codes(nothing found)
Checked fuel pressure: 39/40 PSI (hose off)

I have not checked timing. I need to get underneath and clean off the balancer.

Anything you guys know of to help find this lost power? Or is the 5.0/Auto just that slow?
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
May 23, 2014
#2
  • May 23, 2014
  • #2
It's in the gearing. I'll guaranty that if you put in a 4:10 differential gear set you will easily light the tires. That and a shift kit and you will chirp if not spin the tires going into 2nd.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
May 24, 2014
#3
  • May 24, 2014
  • #3
I figured gears but I just figured the car should be able to muster a little tire slip at WOT. After some reading it seems like a lot of folks with aode have the same problem
 

Bigeaux3

New Member
Jun 13, 2014
8
0
1
Jun 13, 2014
#4
  • Jun 13, 2014
  • #4
I would be willing to bet money that's it your tps. It's pretty simple to dial in , but you'll need a voltmeter. I just did it the other day ( had the same symptoms) and it literary changed the car. There's all kinds of guides to walk you thru it online just google it. BTW.. I have the auto in my 5.0 and if it's setup right they can be just as good if not faster then the manuals. And that's coming from a diehard manual guy.
 

DanG

Founding Member
Oct 8, 2000
694
0
17
Maryland
Jun 18, 2014
#5
  • Jun 18, 2014
  • #5
Verify your timing, and particularly pay attention to the stock crank dampener. They have a tendency to wear over time and begin to wobble, thus causing timing to be off. On a stock car I would try the timing at 12-13 degrees to see how it responds.
One other tid-bit you might look into is cleaning the MAF element. Over time, this as well can get dirty and make the car feel sluggish or at times run/idle rough. I used two methods; Q-tip with electronic parts cleaner, by spraying the Q-tip with the cleaner, and gently brushing the MAF sensor till the small metal filaments are clean. Second method you could use, is rubbing alcohol.
Other than that, yes an auto 94 GT in stock form is quite a dog.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 19, 2014
#6
  • Jun 19, 2014
  • #6
Thanks. I will look up how to tune it.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 19, 2014
#7
  • Jun 19, 2014
  • #7
DanG said:
Verify your timing, and particularly pay attention to the stock crank dampener. They have a tendency to wear over time and begin to wobble, thus causing timing to be off. On a stock car I would try the timing at 12-13 degrees to see how it responds.
One other tid-bit you might look into is cleaning the MAF element. Over time, this as well can get dirty and make the car feel sluggish or at times run/idle rough. I used two methods; Q-tip with electronic parts cleaner, by spraying the Q-tip with the cleaner, and gently brushing the MAF sensor till the small metal filaments are clean. Second method you could use, is rubbing alcohol.
Other than that, yes an auto 94 GT in stock form is quite a dog.
Click to expand...

I have already cleaned the MAF using the electronic sensor cleaner spray. I really need to check timing and look into the TPS
 

Bigeaux3

New Member
Jun 13, 2014
8
0
1
Jun 19, 2014
#8
  • Jun 19, 2014
  • #8
dubbsix said:
I have already cleaned the MAF using the electronic sensor cleaner spray. I really need to check timing and look into the TPS
Click to expand...
Like I stated before the TPS made a huge difference on my car and it was free and only took 10 min. I have found this to be a pretty common thing on rough running vehicles especially fords
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Jun 19, 2014
#9
  • Jun 19, 2014
  • #9
DanG said:
Verify your timing, and particularly pay attention to the stock crank dampener. They have a tendency to wear over time and begin to wobble, thus causing timing to be off.
Click to expand...

A bad balancer won't affect the timing. What you see though with a timing light may be wrong if it has slipped and/or if someone altered the timing not realizing the HB may have slipped.

On a stock car I would try the timing at 12-13 degrees to see how it responds.
One other tid-bit you might look into is cleaning the MAF element. Over time, this as well can get dirty and make the car feel sluggish or at times run/idle rough. I used two methods; Q-tip with electronic parts cleaner, by spraying the Q-tip with the cleaner, and gently brushing the MAF sensor till the small metal filaments are clean. Second method you could use, is rubbing alcohol.
Other than that, yes an auto 94 GT in stock form is quite a dog.
Click to expand...

If the HB is good then adjusting the timing a couple of degrees (base is 10* from the factory) will add a bit more get-up and go. The MAF element is fragile so if you are physically touching it be careful and don't leave any fiber behind from the Q-tip.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Jun 20, 2014
#10
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #10
dubbsix said:
I have already cleaned the MAF using the electronic sensor cleaner spray. I really need to check timing and look into the TPS
Click to expand...
The one volt crap is urban legend. Our cars didn't come with an adjustable tps. One has to "whaller" out the holes where the bolt holes to achieve said one volt. How many miles are on it? She might just be tired man.
 

Bigeaux3

New Member
Jun 13, 2014
8
0
1
Jun 20, 2014
#11
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #11
90lxwhite said:
The one volt crap is urban legend. Our cars didn't come with an adjustable tps. One has to "whaller" out the holes where the bolt holes to achieve said one volt. How many miles are on it? She might just be tired man.
Click to expand...
Hahahah it is one of the moreimportant sensors for the proper performance of your car expecially down low in the rpm rang
 

Bigeaux3

New Member
Jun 13, 2014
8
0
1
Jun 20, 2014
#12
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #12
And most of your after market throttlebodys come with adjustable tps brackets
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Jun 20, 2014
#13
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #13
Bigeaux3 said:
Hahahah it is one of the moreimportant sensors for the proper performance of your car expecially down low in the rpm rang
Click to expand...
And speaking of ranges: they're either in range or they're not. Between .9 and 1.0 volts DCV. His sensor could be bad but adjusting it to the magic 1.0 volt isn't the issue.
 

Bigeaux3

New Member
Jun 13, 2014
8
0
1
Jun 20, 2014
#14
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #14
He never stated wether or not the tb was stock, if it's not stock then yes there's a pretty good chance that the tps could be the root of "some" of these problems. I know this because I have experienced this twice once on a buddy's car and once on mine. You could be surprised it really can make a world of difference if it was not set properly to begin with. And in both situations both of the 5.0's were experiencing a lot if not all of the symptoms he listed. My .02$
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 20, 2014
#15
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #15
@90lxwhite is correct. Dialing in your TPS is an urban myth I'm sorry to say. The ECU zeros out the TPS sensor every time your car starts. Trying to dial it in to within a specific range with a digital volt meter is pretty pointless. The only thing you should need to check with your TPS is that it operates with a smooth, consistent travel and hasn't any jumps or flat spots in voltage during its operation.

The sad fact of the matter is that the SN95, 2.73 geared AOD equipped mustang was among the slowest made of the era.

Beyond bumping up the timing a little, the only thing that's going to get it up and moving in a hurry is a gear swap. For a car that still does any measurable amount of highway driving, a 3.55- 3.73 rear end swap, a decent shift improvement kit and a fair sized plate style external trans cooler should be a mandatory performance application.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Jun 20, 2014
#16
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #16
I'd go w 3.55's I think. I'm not that impressed w the 3.73's. With the 3.73's you'll still be slow just running higher rpm's.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jul 9, 2014
#17
  • Jul 9, 2014
  • #17
Thanks all for your comments. I think i'll skip the TPS tuning and just gear up for the ratio swap (pun?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine surges, cutouts, rough running during acceleration - Help Please!
  • markinms
  • Jun 18, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 20, 2020
markinms
Drivetrain Crazy vibration: need some help!
  • 91GTstroked
  • Jul 16, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 7, 2020
91GTstroked
7
Engine 93 Mustang GT, Code 41/91, KOER Cylinder ID shows 6 and not 8
  • 79MercCapri93
  • Apr 28, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
15K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 17, 2020
79MercCapri93
7
X
Progress Thread 91 LX Vert "Super Slow" Resto/Build
  • Xaxaikw
  • May 28, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 28, 2019
Xaxaikw
X
Timing Cover/harmonic Balancer Removal And Replacement
  • jrichker
  • May 28, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?