• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

why does it seem people are so worried about detonation??

  • Thread starter Thread starter NOmoreHONDA
  • Start date Start date Sep 21, 2007
N

NOmoreHONDA

New Member
Jul 18, 2007
24
0
0
Northshore,Ma
Sep 21, 2007
#1
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #1
I have a question about compression ratios. I have been searching on this site and others. I have found on more than one occasion that people were concerned with detonation/pinging from having compression ratios's above 10.8.1. Whats up with this? The motors I have always delt with were fine with 11.5-even 12.5.1. on 93 octane. Is this not possible on our motors?????? Thanks guys.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Sep 22, 2007
#2
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #2
If your static compression is above 10:1, you should be looking very hard at the quality of your fuel and your cam profile.


What motors are you used to working on?
Were you pulling timing in order to run higher CR?

jason
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Sep 22, 2007
#3
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #3
Detonation is basically the fuel air mixture igniting before it should. It is a bad thing. So people with high compression engines need a higher octane fuel that resists pre igniting. This can also be accomplished by taking timing out of the engine.
 
N

NOmoreHONDA

New Member
Jul 18, 2007
24
0
0
Northshore,Ma
Sep 22, 2007
#4
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #4
Well I am coming from building honda's. On our na and nitrous motors we ran a max of about 12.5.1 on 93 octane. Pulling timing of course with the nitrous motors. We just had to make sure there wasnt any bottle necks in the intake or especially the exhaust and we were good to go.


1.8 liter w/ 12.5.1 on pump gas would make 240whp at approx 9200rpms would be common whp on a street normally aspirated honda.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Sep 22, 2007
#5
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #5
you could also run water injection!
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Sep 22, 2007
#6
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #6
can you run a higher compression ratio with an aluminum head?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 22, 2007
#7
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #7
NOmoreHONDA said:
Well I am coming from building honda's.
Click to expand...

That's your problem right there; comparing apples to oranges. Hondas have pentroof combustion chambers, aluminum heads, smaller cylinders, and typically operate at much higher rpm than what we deal with around here. All those things work in favor of preventing ping. The Honda bike engines can run 12:1 on 87 octane.

The typical pushrod V8 still has iron heads with bathtub combustion chambers and operates at 6000rpm or less. My ~9.25:1 302 has aluminum heads with and a cam skewed toward lots of dynamic compression and it rattles sometimes in 100 degree weather on 87 gas and 12* initial timing.

That's why we worry about ping.

hungrymonkey said:
can you run a higher compression ratio with an aluminum head?
Click to expand...

Typically yes.
 

Blk91stang

Member
Jan 3, 2003
607
0
16
North Brunswick, NJ
Sep 22, 2007
#8
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #8
351w here with iron heads and roughly 12.7:1 static compression running on 93 PUMP GAS! Also has a 150 shot on it with 93 PUMP GAS.

Never heard detonation one time in 8 years with the car with a 10-12* base timing. About 8* with the nitrous. Even tried 100 octane unleaded and 16* base timing and ran SLOWER.

jmo... 11:1 compression is EASILY doable with pump gas!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 22, 2007
#9
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #9
Yeah, but how much dynamic compression is that cam making? Try 12.7:1 on a mild cam and see how long it lasts.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Sep 23, 2007
#10
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #10
Pinging or spark knock is not the same as detonation.

Pinging is preignition of the fuel air charge by some source of ignition other than the spark plug. The source of the ignition can be a hot spot in the combustion chamber such as carbon, a spark plug insulator, side electrode, or a sharp edge on a valve. It occurs before the spark plug can fire and while the piston is still on its upward movement towards TDC. That is the cause of the characteristic ping or ringing sound, much like shaking a coffee can full of BB’s.

Detonation is the uncontrolled explosion of the fuel air charge after the spark plug fires and starts to burn. In a properly running engine, the spark plug ignites the fuel air charge and it burns slowly and evenly across the combustion chamber, much like a fire as it burns its way across a grassy field. When detonation occurs, the ignited fuel air charge causes an increase in the combustion chamber pressure and temperature. The remaining fuel air charge that has not been burned self–ignites explosively causing tremendous heat and pressure. The source of secondary ignition can be the same as preignition, or can be simply due to the heat and pressure. Detonation is what damages engine parts because of the excessive heat and pressure.

Pinging can lead to detonation, and the results are the same: engine damage because of the excessive heat and pressure
 
N

NOmoreHONDA

New Member
Jul 18, 2007
24
0
0
Northshore,Ma
Sep 24, 2007
#11
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #11
tons of good info in here! thanks guys!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Seemingly random 'will it fit' and 'how well does it work' kinds of questions...
  • JasonRP
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2021
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?