Why is my car so slow?!!

A

AZGT

New Member

Dec 17, 2003

7

0

0

Tucson, AZ

Dec 18, 2003

#1

• Dec 18, 2003

• #1

I have a 1997 GT Auto with the following mods:

Off road x pipe
2 chamber Flowmasters
3.73 gears
K&N
FMS C Springs

I took the car to the track a while back and was very dissapointed. The car ran 15.8s at about 87 MPH with a 2.3 60 ft time. Traction was not a problem. I see new v6 5 speeds duplicating these times Shouldn't my car be faster, especially with the gears? Weather wasn't too good-muggy after one of our Tucson monsoon storms. Any ideas?

 

A

AZGT

New Member

Dec 17, 2003

7

0

0

Tucson, AZ

Dec 18, 2003

#2

• Dec 18, 2003

• #2

No one? Can anyone tell me what thier 96-98 GT Autos ran stock at least?

 

White360RFnSwee

Founding Member

Nov 4, 2002

869

0

0

West Palm Beach FL

Dec 18, 2003

#3

• Dec 18, 2003

• #3

" traction was not a problem "

You say that after posting up your 2.3 60 foot times.. I believe traction IS a problem lol..

 

StngStr

Member

Jun 24, 2003

616

0

17

Central Florida

Dec 18, 2003

#4

• Dec 18, 2003

• #4

that's funny. there were two stock 4 door Ram 1500's w/Hemi's running 15.3's last night.

 

R

RacerGT

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2002

2,371

0

0

St. Charles, Missouri

Dec 18, 2003

#5

• Dec 18, 2003

• #5

StngStr said:

that's funny. there were two stock 4 door Ram 1500's w/Hemi's running 15.3's last night.

Click to expand...

Oh that's real nice, way to make this guy feel better. Jesus people, don't act like a moron.

It just takes practice man... don't expect too much when you're new to the sport.

 

StngStr

Member

Jun 24, 2003

616

0

17

Central Florida

Dec 18, 2003

#6

• Dec 18, 2003

• #6

RacerGT said:

Oh that's real nice, way to make this guy feel better. Jesus people, don't act like a moron.

It just takes practice man... don't expect too much when you're new to the sport.

Click to expand...

Screw you.

 

R

RacerGT

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2002

2,371

0

0

St. Charles, Missouri

Dec 18, 2003

#7

• Dec 18, 2003

• #7

StngStr said:

Screw you.

Click to expand...

Good one... Bet that took you a while to think on your own. Tough guy.

 

MachAzure

New Member

May 9, 2003

133

0

0

Atlanta, GA

Dec 18, 2003

#8

• Dec 18, 2003

• #8

I've got a 96 GT auto and ran 15.4 @ 90 mph with 2 chamber flows, 4.10 gears, cold air intake, Under Drive Pulleys and Timing Adjuster

BTW- I had a 2.0 60ft time
These cars are just really slow.

 

9

97predator

Member

Aug 18, 2003

302

0

16

va beach

Dec 18, 2003

#9

• Dec 18, 2003

• #9

hey dont feel bad. i have a 97 Cougar with the 4.6L in it so i understand your woes. with your mods your car i probably making 15 or so hp than mine is. how are you launching? when you pull up i have heard it recomended not to go though the water if youi have street tires. radials are made to disapate heat etc so you are just getting your tires wet. pull around it and power brake your car. when you launch, power brake your car to the brink of eing able to keep your tires from spinning. on my car I have been playing around seeing ho high i can go, and still launch effectively. I went up to 2200-2500, when i let of the brake i just sat and spun. ( probably doesnt help my car does peg leeged burnouts. i need trak lok, lol ) My car comes out of the hole real well at 11500 rpm, chirps a little and goes. Make sure you turn overdrive off too. the mustang has the benefit of woder tires as well, so yo ushould be good to go. be patient and ask guys at the track for advice, if they are cool, they'll be more htan happy to help.

 

Jesus

Banned

May 13, 2003

267

0

0

Woodland Hills, CA

Dec 18, 2003

#10

• Dec 18, 2003

• #10

:OT: Did you ever get those long tubes on your car? I know about them because Im the guy that comes into your shop with the black 2003 GT. As far as your car not being fast I still think alot of it has to do with the altitude here. When the track re-opens I hope to take my car down there and see if I run alot slower than I think I should as well. Are there any other 96-98 GTs out there running without the PI head swap? If so, what are they running?

 

phenix86

New Member

Mar 3, 2003

544

0

0

Phoenix, Arizona..i have spanked this many ricers-

Dec 18, 2003

#11

• Dec 18, 2003

• #11

BC5200 said:

I've got a 96 GT auto and ran 15.4 @ 90 mph with 2 chamber flows, 4.10 gears, cold air intake, Under Drive Pulleys and Timing Adjuster

BTW- I had a 2.0 60ft time
These cars are just really slow.

Click to expand...

how does that happen???? i ran almost bone stock but just with catback and ran a 15.4 and that was with no traction and i went through the water box on street tires. ... i just got 4 10s and pullys and im expecting to pull into the mid 14's easy. Just keep on practicing guys..

 

StratGT

Founding Member

Oct 11, 2001

477

0

16

Mississauga, Canada

Dec 18, 2003

#12

• Dec 18, 2003

• #12

You need a headswap. No Flames please, its just a reality in your car. After a certain rpm, a 96-98GT flat falls on its face. The 3.73's will only help so much. Its all due to the narrow powerband of that engine.

A shift kit, or Jerry Mod and a torque converter would help in a big way.

Don't be discouraged by some of the newer V6 Stangs. I've seen 99+ V6's with a 5speed, 3.73.s, exhaust, and a few engine mods run 14.9 at the track. They can be made to run too.

 

UA2k1GT

Boned

Founding Member

Oct 11, 2001

2,634

0

0

Bham/HSV, AL

Dec 18, 2003

#13

• Dec 18, 2003

• #13

AZGT said:

with a 2.3 60 ft time. Traction was not a problem.

Click to expand...

yes, traction was a problem. They say each tenth in your 60 ft. time is good for .1 to .2 on your ET.

Since you have an auto, turn OD off, drive AROUND the water box, do not use it or go through it, spin your tires a couple times to clean the crap off them. Go up to the line, on the last yellow light launch off idle at about 1/2 to 2/3 throttle, depending on how much you spin, then go WOT as soon as you know you have good traction.

 

navarro98gt

Member

May 15, 2003

213

3

16

chicago, IL

Dec 18, 2003

#14

• Dec 18, 2003

• #14

those 60' times are hurting you bad. bone stock i ran 15.25 with 2.12 60'. with k&N, 3.73, and exhaust i ran 14.86 in my 98 auto.

 

mogs01gt

Founding Member

Jul 22, 2002

3,113

30

119

Ohio

Dec 18, 2003

#15

• Dec 18, 2003

• #15

yes your car is that slow. One way to tell how fast you "COULD" go is the trap speed. The autos of that year are DOGs. You are MAYBe putting down 200 at the wheels.

 

Wickky

New Member

Jun 17, 2003

131

0

0

[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y

Dec 18, 2003

#16

• Dec 18, 2003

• #16

whops look at my time

 

MotleyCrue

New Member

Dec 5, 2003

124

0

0

Cedar Falls, IA

Dec 18, 2003

#17

• Dec 18, 2003

• #17

Not trying to shift direction of this thread, just a question, you guys say the 96-98 Mustangs need a head swap, why would ford put heads that didnt perform well on a Mustang? I dont understand. Wouldnt they try their best to keep the competition close between the mustang and the Fbodys? Can someone explain that to me? Thanks

 

mogs01gt

Founding Member

Jul 22, 2002

3,113

30

119

Ohio

Dec 18, 2003

#18

• Dec 18, 2003

• #18

why would ford only put 260 hp in a pony car? Only Ford knows

 

UA2k1GT

Boned

Founding Member

Oct 11, 2001

2,634

0

0

Bham/HSV, AL

Dec 18, 2003

#19

• Dec 18, 2003

• #19

MotleyCrue said:

Wouldnt they try their best to keep the competition close between the mustang and the Fbodys? Can someone explain that to me? Thanks

Click to expand...

you would think they would try to keep the competition close, but they obviously do not.

 

MotleyCrue

New Member

Dec 5, 2003

124

0

0

Cedar Falls, IA

Dec 18, 2003

#20

• Dec 18, 2003

• #20

Thats a good question Mogs, i really would like to know the answer to that question, at one time it seemed like the Fbodys and mustang were always battleing for supremecy, what happened to those days?