• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Why use an Adjustable Fuel Regulator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vristang
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2006

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 3, 2006
#1
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #1
I had a thought and figured I would get some input from others.

Is there any need to use and adjustable fuel pressure regulator when tuning with a tweecer?
If you are supoosed to return fuel press to the stock level, why not use the stock regulator?

thanks for the input
jason
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 3, 2006
#2
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #2
vristang said:
I had a thought and figured I would get some input from others.

Is there any need to use and adjustable fuel pressure regulator when tuning with a tweecer?
If you are supoosed to return fuel press to the stock level, why not use the stock regulator?

thanks for the input
jason
Click to expand...

I do use the stocker

I have never owned an afpr myself

Guess I never will

Grady
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 5, 2006
#3
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #3
Well cant higher pressures make the injectors act "bigger" than what they really are at a given pulsewidth?
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
Apr 5, 2006
#4
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #4
What he said...
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Apr 5, 2006
#5
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #5
nmcgrawj said:
Well cant higher pressures make the injectors act "bigger" than what they really are at a given pulsewidth?
Click to expand...

Yes, but you are over-driving them. Instead of running them harder then designed, a lot of peeps would rather get a bigger injector and run stock fuel pressure.

There is a right way and a wrong way to do things... a lot of guys do HCI and use 24's with an AFPR, while IMO they should be getting 30s and hammering out a tune. But then I am an admitted TwEECer junky and would rather tinker with the eec then slap a mechanical band aid in there.

Adam
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 5, 2006
#6
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #6
Well yea i hear ya. Regardless of if u or i would rather tune with our pms or tweecer, that is what they are made for right?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 5, 2006
#7
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #7
nmcgrawj said:
Well cant higher pressures make the injectors act "bigger" than what they really are at a given pulsewidth?
Click to expand...

You are absolutely correct Nate

Allow me to ramble on for a while if you please and I promise ...... it will make a point about several methods of tuning ...... I hope

Lets consider three examples

1) Ford tunes our Stangs with the pcm ...... nuff said

2) Us hot rodders think we are tuning when we do stuff like:

a) Adjust the throttle body blade stop screw
b) Twist the dizzy
c) + or - fuel pressure
d) Use maf/inj's that are caled to each other

3) EEC Tuner/Tweecer peeps try and tune as Ford did but attempt to use values that more accurately represent what has changed due to the new hot rod parts that have been installed.

#1 has to be the most accurate ... would you not agree

#2 gets the job done ... has its limits & not much flexability

#3 can be effective ... WHY to change values must be known

When tuning with #3, you are striving for accuracy with things like a, b, & d from above.

Say you got everything all set and your tune is great

If you do any one or more of the below

Up the fuel pressure
Turn the tb screw
Twist the dizzy
Delete emissions equip
Install matching caled maf/inj's

The pcm now can't understand what happened

Any mechanical changes are counter productive to your previous tuning efforts

It is worth noting here the same kind of deal goes on when you make these kinds of mechanical adjustments on a stock Stang. The pcm can only deal with so much of that kind of stuff before it freaks and drivability goes out the window

I'm done now

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 5, 2006
#8
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #8
Don 95Vert said:
What he said...
Click to expand...

Good to see you over here

Don is a much better splainer than me

besides

He has forgot more than I know

Grady
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
Apr 5, 2006
#9
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #9
Thanks Grady. IMHO, raising FP is a temporary band-aid until you can get bigger injectors. If you are running out of injector just a little, one thing to keep in mind is that Ford rates their injectors at 39.5 FP, while the rest of the industry rates them at 43.5 FP. So if you are running 50# SD injectors at Ford Spec, they are NOT delivering 50# - so often in these cases raising FP to the mfg's specs can solve a problem where you are barely running out of injector.
 

cobramanphil

Member
Apr 13, 2004
36
0
6
Bay Area
Apr 5, 2006
#10
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #10
I'd say get the afpr only if you know your stock one is shot or leaking pressure. Just make sure the aftermarket one has lots of BLING and is set at the stock fuel pressure
 
Z

zZsKyZz

Member
Dec 1, 2005
503
0
17
Apr 7, 2006
#11
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #11
Hehe...

Twist the dizzy...

Hehe..
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
Apr 7, 2006
#12
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #12
Sometimes with a high pressure 255 FP, the stock FP cannot control fuel satisfactorily - in those cases an aftermarket FPR of good quality, may help. I'd always use an aftermarket FPR with a 255 HP FP.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Apr 14, 2006
#13
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #13
I used to use my AFPR to bump the pressure when i was using 19#ers. Now i just have it set to 39psi and i leave it there.
 

HPLouis

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2001
65
0
6
DC Metro Area
Apr 18, 2006
#14
  • Apr 18, 2006
  • #14
I had to use an AFPR to bump down my FP after I added the inline and intank 255lph pumps. Plus, it gives me an additional port to stick an electric FP gauge on.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 19, 2006
#15
  • Apr 19, 2006
  • #15
I never came back to say thanks for all the input.
Thank you.

So, if using a 255lph it may be necessary to use an aftermarket fpr, due to control issues.
I can understand that.

Guess I'll keep my afpr in place for the time being. I have enough things to worry about, just learning the tweecer.
No need to complicate things with concern about fuel control.

:Word:

jason
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Apr 20, 2006
#16
  • Apr 20, 2006
  • #16
I need to get a Tweecer so I can come in here and play with the big boys!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
631
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
216
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
A
For Sale Kirban Fuel Pressure Regulator NEW
  • afjLX
  • May 14, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
268
Engine and Power Adder May 14, 2025
afjLX
A
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?