• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Wicked 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcurtis
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Feb 4, 2008
#1
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #1
[url=http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2d522901-1e21-4c37-8ce4-99a80171e48d.htm]
My 92 Mustang Lx, 302ci with 12.0.1 compression, AFR 185s, Lunati 51018 Cam with 242/252 duration @0.050 & 600/620 Lift, Trickflow R Intake, 75mm TB, 1 5/8" Headers with dynomax Bullet mufflers, G-Force T5, Spooled 8.8 with 4.30's. 6200 rpm rev limiter with 10* base timing running on 93 octane. New video soon after I finish breaking in the motor. It should rev to 7200-7500 rpms. I'm gonna run straight VP 110 race gas with 18-20* timing and rev it to the moon. Should be another 40-50rwhp increase over what i[/URL]
Found this on streetfire, that cars sound almost gave me the chills. Don't know who's it is but it is bad and I give him props:Track:
 

silvrbulithed

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
10
1
1
Naval Station Newport, RI
Feb 4, 2008
#2
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #2
Dude that was audible ****!
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Feb 4, 2008
#3
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #3
yeah ive seen that 100 times, pure tities!!
 

MrXCESSIVESPEED

Member
Mar 10, 2002
0
1
6
Maryland
Feb 4, 2008
#4
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #4
eh..... sounded good at idle but thats about it IMO.
 

black87ttop

Member
Oct 29, 2007
43
2
8
burlington,new jersey
Feb 4, 2008
#5
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #5
Yea i agree, sounds like chit, except for the idle.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Feb 4, 2008
#6
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #6
haters.. lol
 

MrXCESSIVESPEED

Member
Mar 10, 2002
0
1
6
Maryland
Feb 4, 2008
#7
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #7
slow95gt said:
haters.. lol
Click to expand...

not hatin man..... lol.
 
M

Mike85000

New Member
Feb 22, 2007
65
0
0
Feb 4, 2008
#8
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #8
Open tubes always sound good at an idle.
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Feb 4, 2008
#9
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #9
sounds mean fo sho
 

adidas

Member
Apr 3, 2004
123
0
16
Liberty, Mo
Feb 4, 2008
#10
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #10
yeah, if nothing else, it sounds real mean..
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Feb 5, 2008
#11
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #11
MrXCESSIVESPEED said:
not hatin man..... lol.
Click to expand...

what do you expect 3/4's of the board worships the Stage 1 TFS cam

they never heard what 250's @.050 sounded or run like !!!!!!
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Feb 5, 2008
#12
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #12
PUNISHER RACING said:
what do you expect 3/4's of the board worships the Stage 1 TFS cam

they never heard what 250's @.050 sounded or run like !!!!!!
Click to expand...

Agreed. The sound of compression and a big cam is a beautiful thing. If you don't think that car sounds good above idle you need to turn in your american flag and buy a Honda. I'd like to see it go with traction, it seems to run hard.
 

MrXCESSIVESPEED

Member
Mar 10, 2002
0
1
6
Maryland
Feb 5, 2008
#13
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #13
PUNISHER RACING said:
what do you expect 3/4's of the board worships the Stage 1 TFS cam

they never heard what 250's @.050 sounded or run like !!!!!!
Click to expand...
Youve got a point

blackened88lx said:
If you don't think that car sounds good above idle you need to turn in your american flag and buy a Honda. I'd like to see it go with traction, it seems to run hard.
Click to expand...
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Feb 5, 2008
#14
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #14
It'll never sound good if it doesn't have flows and an h-pipe to go with that TFS-1!!!
 

riceslayer302

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
0
1
0
CT
Feb 5, 2008
#15
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #15
sounded nasty when he got on it
 

ford302redneck

Member
Jul 28, 2007
85
0
6
Hartsville, SC
Feb 5, 2008
#16
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #16
I love the sound of open headers.

But Ive been around alot of dirt track late models.

Im not saying it sounds good, but I love it regardless.

Check plus for you man.
 
9

90five0oh

New Member
Sep 12, 2006
29
0
0
i live in robertsdale, al
Feb 5, 2008
#17
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #17
sounds nasty for sure. but would really sound better with a good set of mufflers on it to tone it down a little bit. badass car regardless
 

87foxstang

Member
May 10, 2007
0
0
16
Cromwell, CT
Feb 5, 2008
#18
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #18
That thing is sick.

*looks around for nearest towel*
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 5, 2008
#19
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #19
Sounded like a cammed out high compression engine with open full lengths.
 

TwoToneHatch

Active Member
Mar 22, 2007
170
2
28
New Jersey
Feb 5, 2008
#20
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #20
That sounded good but a nice set of mufflers would make it even better!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
330 RWHP On Nitrous vs. 330 RWHP N/A
  • PlzgoEz
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2006
86bluecobra
8
P
How Much RWHP Will This Combo Produce?
  • PlzgoEz
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
542
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 9, 2006
Daggar
D
NEW Track Times!! (LONG)
  • 25thmustang
  • May 26, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 28, 2008
ChromdOutDubs
P
How Much RWHP Will This Combo Produce?
  • PlzgoEz
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
642
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 9, 2006
stangjunkie
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?