• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Wideband Question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninety15.0
  • Start date Start date Sep 5, 2007

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 5, 2007
#1
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys. Im looking into getting a wideband for use with my Tweecer. I want to get some feedback as to what systems you guys are using and how they are working out for you.

I have been looking at the innovative kits because they seem to perform very well/accurately. Are there any reasons for paying a couple hundred more for the LM1 as opposed to the LC1? I will be running the wideband sensor in its own bung in the H pipe so there is no need for narrow band configs with the tweecer. I want to keep the two stockers in place.

Any suggestions or experience with innovative or other kits would be appreciated. Thanks!

-Nick
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Sep 5, 2007
#2
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #2
I have the Lm-1 kit. Works very well. Have yet to play with there software much though. It has helped in tuning my carb though.
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Sep 5, 2007
#3
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #3
I have the LC-1 sensor along with the DATAQ DI-148U so I can datalog the wideband along with the Tweecer using BinEdit. I haven't really had a chance to get out to the track to do any tuning with it yet though. My neighbor has the LC-1 on his Nova and he's been able to get that thing running really well now.
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Sep 5, 2007
#4
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #4
I have the LC-1 as well, but I have mine run through the EGR. My EGR failed, so because I already had the Tweecer, I just removed the EGR instead of spending money to fix it.

The EGR voltage range is the same as a WB, you can connect the LC-1 into the EGR wires to the PCM and datalog that way.
 
Y

Yellowpnoy

New Member
Feb 6, 2006
203
0
0
Sep 5, 2007
#5
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #5
I am running he Dynojet wideband commander. I love it, plus the gauge fits in a standard 2 1/16" gauge pod on my pillar. Also, it comes with software on a CD and is super easy to install and use, and it can datalog up to 44 minutes of info, provides a lambda graph in real time with RPM and TPS inputs when you have it hooked up to your laptop, and has a warning light if your set parameters are exceeded so you dont grenade your motor, and you can save run files, i picked it up for $369.00.

Anthony
427w
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Sep 5, 2007
#6
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #6
Innovate is the most accurate available , AEM is 2nd most accurate and only 299 from summit ......AEM is a good buy for the money ......I have an autometer but its pricey , only got it because it matched my other gauges , I use an Innovate to tune with ...
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 6, 2007
#7
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #7
Thanks for the info guys. I think im going to go with the innovative LC-1 System. I read an article in one of the mustang mags saying that it was the most accurate system they tested out of 10 or so. And it had the ability to be re-calibrated as the sensor began to wear. I like that feature. Does anyone have any reason why i wouldnt get the LC-1 instead of spending the extra 200 bucks for the LM-1. I have found a LC-1 kit on ebay for about 170...seems like a good legit deal. Thanks again for the info.
 
A

Azul93GT

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
376
0
0
Chicago, IL
Oct 5, 2007
#8
  • Oct 5, 2007
  • #8
The AEM Wideband UEGO Controller Air/Fuel Ratio Gauge looks interesting particularly from the cost standpoint. Is there any reason why I should stay away from this Wideband Air/Fuel Ratio Gauge?
 
U

UnderdogGN

New Member
May 7, 2006
74
0
0
Oct 5, 2007
#9
  • Oct 5, 2007
  • #9
i have the AEM wideband installed on my car. VERY easy to install....mostly all plug and play. However i just read the A/F ratio from the guage because i dont have a laptop
 

LordMustangGT

Member
Jan 9, 2006
118
0
17
Port Orchard, WA
Oct 5, 2007
#10
  • Oct 5, 2007
  • #10
I have an AEM I have yet to install, paid 400+ for mine. its the 6-1 controler one, I have no laptop yet for it, but it will plug into Stand-alones too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
865
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
398
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
C
Paxton novi 1200SL
  • Cambo617
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
136
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Oct 9, 2025
Cambo617
C
W
FoxBody Gauge Cluster - What would you pay?
  • wildstang17
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
249
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?