Windsor Engine Database - Please add your engine!

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Aug 30, 2006

#1

• Aug 30, 2006

• #1

I've just finished building an online database for windsor series engines. The objective is to gather data on everyone's build so it can be used as a point of reference for people building engines in the future. This way people will be able to easily see how different combinations perform and allow sorting by part/hp/ET etc.

Please add your engine in the page below.

http://www.302w.com/Engine_database/Engine_Database.aspx

 

jasonn

Founding Member

Sep 26, 2002

316

0

16

By Rochester MN

Aug 30, 2006

#2

• Aug 30, 2006

• #2

Sorry, don't have vic jr heads???

 

Max Power

Active Member

Jul 31, 2003

1,774

1

36

St Paul

Aug 30, 2006

#3

• Aug 30, 2006

• #3

Windsor engines are more than just 302s.

 

dennis112

15 Year Member

May 15, 2005

1,561

36

79

Amish Wonderland of Central PA.

Aug 30, 2006

#4

• Aug 30, 2006

• #4

jasonn said:

Sorry, don't have vic jr heads???

Click to expand...

X2

 

classic boost

Founding Member

Feb 3, 1999

709

0

0

canton, oh

Aug 30, 2006

#5

• Aug 30, 2006

• #5

the et function isn't working (doesn't display in the d/b).

 

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Aug 30, 2006

#6

• Aug 30, 2006

• #6

Its just an afternoon's work hence a couple of typo/s short comings.

If you can list any parts (intakes/heads/etc) that I am missing let me know and I will add them all.

The reason I didnt have free text for the heads was I wanted to avoid having 500 different ways to spell various brand/models. This should make it easier to sort and see trends in the results.

Theres a small bug with the ET field that I'll fix tonight.

 

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Aug 30, 2006

#7

• Aug 30, 2006

• #7

Max Power said:

Windsor engines are more than just 302s.

Click to expand...

I know, hence the ability to enter any engine capacity to cater for strokers, 289s, 351s etc. The site is aimed at all windsors but 302w is the domain I have.

 

Max Power

Active Member

Jul 31, 2003

1,774

1

36

St Paul

Aug 30, 2006

#8

• Aug 30, 2006

• #8

C0V3R said:

I know, hence the ability to enter any engine capacity to cater for strokers, 289s, 351s etc. The site is aimed at all windsors but 302w is the domain I have.

Click to expand...

OK, cool. I'm in.

 

67Dylan

New Member

May 11, 2006

259

0

0

Phoenix, AZ

Aug 30, 2006

#9

• Aug 30, 2006

• #9

Canfield heads aren't on the list. Other than that seems workable IMO.

 

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Aug 31, 2006

#10

• Aug 31, 2006

• #10

Added a whole bunch of new parts to the lists.

 

H

Helmantel

New Member

Aug 9, 2006

206

1

0

Aug 31, 2006

#11

• Aug 31, 2006

• #11

I couldn't find a Shelby Hiriser intake.

 

dennis112

15 Year Member

May 15, 2005

1,561

36

79

Amish Wonderland of Central PA.

Aug 31, 2006

#12

• Aug 31, 2006

• #12

Either there is a built-in delay or it didn't accept my info.

 

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Aug 31, 2006

#13

• Aug 31, 2006

• #13

dennis112 said:

Either there is a built-in delay or it didn't accept my info.

Click to expand...

Really? Hmm. Did you have any little red validation messages showing on the right hand side?

 

dennis112

15 Year Member

May 15, 2005

1,561

36

79

Amish Wonderland of Central PA.

Sep 1, 2006

#14

• Sep 1, 2006

• #14

C0V3R said:

Really? Hmm. Did you have any little red validation messages showing on the right hand side?

Click to expand...

No, it just came up with a new screen, kind of like a refresh. I was afraid to try again because I didn't want to mess up your database with a duplicate.

I resubmitted last night and it accepted my info. It also "refreshed" and had included my data. Never noted the validation message that time either. Probably just me. . . . .

 

5

57fairlane

New Member

Apr 2, 2005

560

0

0

Oakwood, GA

Sep 1, 2006

#15

• Sep 1, 2006

• #15

I think you should add a provision for transmission types . . .

Wouldn't want someone to be disappointed with a dyno number only because it was going through a c4 instead of a stick.

 

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Sep 20, 2006

#16

• Sep 20, 2006

• #16

Added transmission types into the mix, and some extra parts.

 

W

wildstang

Founding Member

Apr 8, 1999

217

0

0

Orange, Vermont

Sep 20, 2006

#17

• Sep 20, 2006

• #17

good idea COV3R. I think torque and the rpm maximums should be added so someone doesn't build a 302 to make 450hp based on someone elses results only to find out you need to rev it 7000 rpm. Might seem logical to some who are familiar with engines, but it won't to others less experienced. Just my thoughts on it.