• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

with my AFR165's, what is my compression ratio?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockin_rick
  • Start date Start date Jul 27, 2005
R

rockin_rick

Member
Oct 9, 2003
968
1
17
Jul 27, 2005
#1
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #1
I have a stock shortblock (well, really a FRPP shortblock assy made in 2000 (for the explorer) but I believe it's the same), AFR165s (58cc), Felpro 1011-2 head gaskets. What CR does this work out to? It's hard to compute since I don't really know the size of the eyebrows in the pistons and exactly how far up the bore the top of the piston is... Does anyone know for sure?

Thanks,
Rick
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 28, 2005
#2
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #2
Appx 9.3-9.4:1 should be close enough.
 
R

rockin_rick

Member
Oct 9, 2003
968
1
17
Jul 29, 2005
#3
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #3
Thanks- is this an educated guess, common belief, personally measured/calculated, or fact? No offense, just trying to judge your confidence level... (I have a calculation/formula which I need to supply the CR, and just want it as accurate as possible to prevent GIGO)

Rick
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Jul 29, 2005
#4
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #4
Grn92LX said:
Appx 9.3-9.4:1 should be close enough.
Click to expand...

A 9.4:1 with the 58cc heads would be very close.
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 30, 2005
#5
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #5
S/CBlack95GT said:
A 9.4:1 with the 58cc heads would be very close.
Click to expand...

good enough for 89 octane then right
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 30, 2005
#6
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #6
Interesting. Having flat top pistons I am supposed to be at 10.5 :1 using the same heads. I wonder what the difference in HP would be as upposed to 9:1? They said I would be required to use 93 octane though.
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Jul 30, 2005
#7
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #7
I'm not entirely sure, but CHP uses flattops on their 302/306 and it gives near stock compression.

Also, those combustion chambers should be very detonation resistant. So, what kind of gas you use would depend more on your overall timing and A/F ratio as opposed to the bump in compression from the heads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
L
Engine Need help diagnosing 2 dead cylinders
  • lvgnmz
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
464
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2025
Mustang5L5
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
What in gods green earth happend to my N/A 2.3?
  • Piranahbite
  • Mar 24, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 1, 2024
Piranahbite
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?