• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Would Higher Octane Gas Make Your Car Slower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DFG 5OH
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2005

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Nov 5, 2005
#1
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #1
Well in an attempt to solve my pre-detonation problems I put $20.00 worth of 93 octane in my car. Right off the bat I noticed that all my pinging problems were gone, and on a side note, the smell of higher octane gasoline is . Anyways, i went out to run it up in the RPMS, and my car did not feel as fast as it did with 87, AND it seemed to get really hot, and smell different (not the exhaust). My temp. guage didnt reflect a change in tempature, but i could feel it outside my car. Even on a cool night, where my car would run the best, and stay cool, it would not be as fast and get hotter than usual. Is this all in my head, or could this be true?

Thank You Fellow Stangnetters,
Matt J.
 

deadlast

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
495
0
0
Belmont, MA
Nov 5, 2005
#2
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #2
i have heard higher octane can lower your mpg, buts thats ill i know off. i put in some 93 like yourself, and didnt notice any performance changes, but it did start and run smoother.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Nov 5, 2005
#3
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #3
Higher octane, WHEN NOT NEEDED, can diminish performance (it is akin to having ignition timing too retarded).

The difference in octane is so minimal, I would not sweat anything temp-wise you notice. It would take a lot more octane to notice a temp delta, etc.

The issue IMHO comes down to the fact that our timing tables are not consistant. We ping at lower and mid loads but not at higher loads (it seems to me). So we shadetree-tune (timing, octane, etc) for the Low-RPM ping, for instance. But now we dont have maximized high-load total timing. So it is a trade off.

With it pinging at lower loads for you Matt, your high load total timing was probably pretty optimal (in stock tune) for performance. Now the timing is essentially a little retarded at high load (but you dont ping at low loads).

Now if you were only pinging at higher RPM's, that is different than my experiences so I wont comment. That would actually probably be a little easier to deal with and tune around.


Good luck man.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Nov 5, 2005
#4
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #4
thanks for the help hissin, my tank is nearly empty, and i'll stick some 87 back in it, and see how it is.
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Nov 5, 2005
#5
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #5
5.0 Mustang did an article on octane and ran a motor on the dyno on different octane fuels and also tested with octane booster. The conclusion was that there is a sweet spot when it comes to octane. The higher octane fuels burn slower than the lower octane stuff and therefore, the motor was making less HP beyond a certain octane rating, even with more timing.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Nov 5, 2005
#6
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #6
matthiasj said:
thanks for the help hissin, my tank is nearly empty, and i'll stick some 87 back in it, and see how it is.
Click to expand...

Yeah, good idea.......more octane = less volitile = less explosion = less power...pretty simple.
Scott
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Nov 5, 2005
#7
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #7
well maybe i'll try to fix my pinging somewhere else. Hissin, i'm pinging more up top, under normal driving, no ping, but when i get on it, especailly in 3rd and 4th gear it pings pretty bad past 3k on 87 octane, none with 93.
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Nov 5, 2005
#8
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #8
today i changed my spark plugs and at the same time sprayed electric cleaner on my MAF wires
my car stopped pinging (only had minor WOT pinging) and idles alot smoother now
also more powerful up top in rpms

i dunno if it was maf cleaning or spark plugs, i went from 4 prong bosche to the 1 prong autolite 25's and now everything is much nicer
 

dstanggt50

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2000
1,316
0
0
Woodinville, WA
Nov 5, 2005
#9
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #9
sage2k said:
today i changed my spark plugs and at the same time sprayed electric cleaner on my MAF wires
my car stopped pinging (only had minor WOT pinging) and idles alot smoother now
also more powerful up top in rpms

i dunno if it was maf cleaning or spark plugs, i went from 4 prong bosche to the 1 prong autolite 25's and now everything is much nicer
Click to expand...

I would think it is a mixture of both, I've heard that those platinums don't work very well.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Nov 5, 2005
#10
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #10
Matt, I have played the same games you are. I wont bore you with it, but I have Low RPM/low load ping. I know several factors which are involved and need a TwEECer to get around them.

So I run the higher octane for low RPM ping even though I dont ping at higher RPM's no matter what.

I am sorry if my previous post came across misleading. I would tune so you dont have any ping at ANY time. If you need to run more octane to accomplish this, do it. If 93 octane takes care of your high rpm ping (and all other pinging you ever might have), I would:

a) run the 93
b) Run a lower octane but also lower timing till you dont ping.
c) do a little of both.


Scott, I know you know this, but your post is a little misleading IMHO. Higher octane most definately has as much potential energy as lower octane (actually more). But because it is less volatile (octane rating being a measure of knock resistance), it can handle more heat and pressure before igniting. My advice would be that if someone never ever pings on 87 octane, but runs a higher octane because they feel it helps (on a non-piezo equipped car), that is a waste. In that case, the 87 is sufficient and the higher octane is a waste of money and performance - just like you said.

But for anyone with ping issues, the higher octane definately is helpful. Your comment quoted Matt's quote, and he does have detonation issues at high RPM (and his issues diminish with more octane if I read him right). I would not run 87 in that case.

Matt, also do be sure your pump is not leaving you dry at high RPM (high demand). A dirty fuel filter or weak pump reveal themselves in that situation.

Sage, good call on getting those plats out. Annealed copper is much more conductive, but at the expense of greater wear (gap erosion) over time.
Good luck to all.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 6, 2005
#11
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #11
Matt, have you tried 89 octane? It'd be kind of a compromise. What is your base timing at anyway? (didn't read the whole thread) Of course, the only REAL solution is to figure out why it's pinging and fix it, but I know that can be very elusive and frustrating.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Nov 6, 2005
#12
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #12
Pull the plugs out and see what they say, they willl tell you what's a matta wit jou......
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Nov 6, 2005
#13
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #13
i'll check the plugs today, i havent checked them since i got my car fixed. I put a full tank of 87 in last night, it does run better, havent checked if it still pings. My timing is suppost to be set at 8*. The previous owner really messed up the dizzy and timing, and me and a good mustang mechanic got the dizzy supposedly at the right place, and got the timing set right. He told me be tried the timing at 10*, but pinged REALLY bad in higher RPMS. 8* is a compermise i guess. I'll be dynoing Nov. 12th, and i'll post numbers, and charts, hopefully the wideband will tell me something.
 

ROLLIN5.0

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
135
0
0
Tulsa, OK
Nov 6, 2005
#14
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #14
Why does everyone on here seem to accept the fact that their car is pinging ? If your car is pinging on 87 onctane fuel, there is something wrong with it, period. Either there is a component in your fuel delivery system that is malfunctioning, or your mods have gotten to the point that you need a bigger fuel delivery system, or a tune. Running a higher octane fuel to eliminate the problem is like straping a bandaid over the knub after your finger gets cut off. Find out why your car isn't running right. Secondly, detonation, or preignition will make your engine run hotter than it will when these conditions are not present, so you should have seen a decrease in temperature when you ran the higher octane fuel.

Brandon
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Nov 6, 2005
#15
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #15
I understand that Brandon, but there is so many different things that cause predetonation that its hard to track down. I'm going to yank a few plugs today, see how those look. I'm still stock, COULD be a fuel prob, but my pressure is fine.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Nov 6, 2005
#16
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #16
Brandon, it would be nice if it was that simple. The stock GT tune leaves some to be desired (I think it was an attempt to clean up a dirty motor - that was one reason the 5.0 went away).

FWIW, there is a difference between detonation and pre-ignition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
T
  • Locked
1990 2.3L automatic - real bad engine sputtering
  • the_steve_randolph
  • Jun 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2024
the_steve_randolph
T
Engine On stock GT - any benefits to higher octane gas?
  • MrPerfect2
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 27, 2019
MrPerfect2
L
1997 Cobra Tune Question (and some background on the car)
  • lonely
  • Apr 28, 2020
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
5K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 5, 2020
08GT500
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?