• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

WTF are they thinking????

  • Thread starter Thread starter bradleyem
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2008

bradleyem

Member
Apr 17, 2006
186
3
19
Columbus, Ohio
Dec 10, 2008
#1
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #1
Have you guys seen this? Ford is threatening to sue therangerstation.com and other websites for the use of the Ford name, and anything related to Ford products. What a bunch of BS!!! The very sites that promote the brand and support enthusiasts are being targeted. Have they approached stangnet yet?

TRS is being attacked by Ford Motor Company! - The Ranger Station Forums

Michigan's Mustang Headquarters
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Dec 10, 2008
#2
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #2
WOW all this in the mist of them asking for a bail out.... hmmm there hurting for money that bad that they have to go after the very men and woman that support them and buy there cars ! WOW what a great way to SHAT on your cutomers and supporters !
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Dec 10, 2008
#3
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #3
Excuse me but why should other people make money off of their copyrighted material? If you had something trademarked you would want royalties too, you can easily make forum about for cars or any other brand without using logos or trade marked names. You can use personal pictures to enhance your site.....if people on these sites and forums are "big" supporters they should have plenty of personal pictures for websites and forums. My $0.02

P.S. Stangnet webmaster s are very smart. Do you see any ford logos on their site? No. only in Ford paid for advertising...all they have is a picture of a GT-500 it doesn't say Ford, Shelby, Mustang or GT-500 on it anywhere so they can claim it's one of their personal cars.......You have to be smart when you're using logos pictures and names, those other sites need to follow Stangnet as an example.
 

bradleyem

Member
Apr 17, 2006
186
3
19
Columbus, Ohio
Dec 10, 2008
#4
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #4
I agree that people do not have the right to make money from the use of trademarked or copyrighted materials. However, suing someone because they use the word "Ranger" in the name of a forum dedicated to enthusiasts of Ford Ranger vehicles is total BS. So, when I'm searching for a forum to get information on modifying my newly purchased Ranger I should google " small pickup from the blue oval forum"...oh wait, the blue oval is trademarked too.......

I also agree that using trademarked images for banners/etc should not be allowed. Like you said, plenty of content can be provided by the users themselves. However, if the content is used for recreational use, and not commercial use, then there should be no problem with it.

Most owners/operators of these forums are not living off from any revenue generated by them, in fact many end up paying out of their own pockets just to keep them running.

On the other hand, the forums ARE promoting the companies products, aftermarket support, and in many cases running banner ads directly marketing to their users. Many people make decisions about what vehicle to purchase based on research done on these types of forums.

I don't want this to turn into a flame war, but I also think that it is just wrong for a company to kick its most loyal customers like this in what amounts to extortion from my point of view.
 

bamaster

New Member
Jul 30, 2001
43
0
0
Houston, TX
Dec 10, 2008
#5
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #5
It's common practice to protect company brands. I was even contacted by the PBA (Professional Bowlers Tour) about my bowling website, because there are many discussions of the PBA Tour on my forums.

Think about all the work warning posts that get posted on some of these sites? Ford cannot be associated with websites with their brand that could appear to be sexist or racist or anything like that.

It isn't biting the hand that feeds them. It's protecting the value and integrity of a brand that costs millions of dollars to build.
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Dec 10, 2008
#6
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #6
kocky shirts is going out of business because of them. really like their shirts, sad to see it happen to them.
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Dec 13, 2008
#7
  • Dec 13, 2008
  • #7
whyask said:
WOW all this in the mist of them asking for a bail out.... hmmm there hurting for money that bad that they have to go after the very men and woman that support them and buy there cars ! WOW what a great way to SHAT on your cutomers and supporters !
Click to expand...

First of all, Ford CEO Alan Mulally has already stated they have enough cash and secured credit to keep them afloat well through 2009. And would seek a credit line of $9 billion, only as a critical backstop or safeguard against worsening conditions as Ford drives transformational change in their company.

In addition, Mulally's main reason for testifying before Congress. Was to seek support for the auto industry.

Therefore Ford is not hurting for money, at this time.


That being said, I strongly recommend that you read Ford's business plan, in which I've posted a link below for you to examine !


The Ford Story - Ford's Response to the Automotive Industry Bailout Plan | Ford Vehicles
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Dec 13, 2008
#8
  • Dec 13, 2008
  • #8
yeah, fords doing the best from what i hear. gm and chrysler are looking really bad. as much as i'm not a chevy guy, i would hate to see them go out of business. i'd rather see a chevy on the road then a honda. over a hundred years chevrolet has been around. i respect american auto companies, and their past. alot of bad ass cars have come from these 3 companys and their side companys.
 

stangdude2000

Founding Member
Jun 23, 2001
1,727
0
0
Northern VA
Dec 14, 2008
#9
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #9
I understand both points of view to this topic. Yes, its unfair to Ford that someone else makes profit off of their brand. But think of this: Ford is also getting a ton of free marketing that is far more effective than anything they could put out in a brochure or commerical. Word of mouth is the best marketing available.

Also think of this point of view: why is it illegal to make money of a product with the Ford logo, but completely legal to make money off a part that is specifically design for and works only with the Mustang or any other individual vehicle? You are making profit off of the brand still...
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Dec 14, 2008
#10
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #10
i could be wrong in thinking this, but ford owns the blue oval symbol, ford owns the name mustang to be associated with the car, ford has the right to call their truck the ranger, etc.

the part you are designing, is a completely different part, design, how its manufactured, the material, etc. you are designing it for that car, but your only advertising it fits 05-09 mustangs, etc. if you put a giant blue oval on it, and wrote ford inside of that, i can see every right to ford suing, for using their name on a product.

when i clicked and read a little of the ranger stations reason for getting sued, its for selling a product that had the ford logo on it. i see every right ford had to sue, using someone elses logo with out permission is definitely a good reason to sue IMO.
 
F

FarmerTom390

New Member
Feb 13, 2002
8
0
0
Johnstown PA
Dec 14, 2008
#11
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #11
I think I have read that the ranger station doesnt have to pay the money or go to court because they agreed to stop selling the merchandise with the Ford logo on it. They are supposed to be able to keep their name and what not.
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Dec 14, 2008
#12
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #12
None the less I find this outlandinsh BS all to much to be inconjunction with the auto world needed bailouts. And red05bullitgt<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_7739167", true); </SCRIPT> either way ford STILL ASKED FOR MONEY! Why ask if you dont need it...... and dont spin the wheel of a ".....just in case" scene. Ford has known for a VERY LONG time that there logo was being used is it wrong YES...did they care at the time NO, NOW all of a sudden they decided hey why not. In the mist of everything that is going on in the economy right now Ford should be happy that there still in buinsess making the money they are NOT going after the hands that feed them ......FOR NOW..... ( Just my 2 cents...I dont mean to offend anyone..and yes red I wasnt bashing on you..just making a point)
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Dec 14, 2008
#13
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #13
whyask said:
None the less I find this outlandinsh BS all to much to be inconjunction with the auto world needed bailouts. And red05bullitgt<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_7739167", true); </SCRIPT> either way ford STILL ASKED FOR MONEY! Why ask if you dont need it...... and dont spin the wheel of a ".....just in case" scene. Ford has known for a VERY LONG time that there logo was being used is it wrong YES...did they care at the time NO, NOW all of a sudden they decided hey why not. In the mist of everything that is going on in the economy right now Ford should be happy that there still in buinsess making the money they are NOT going after the hands that feed them ......FOR NOW..... ( Just my 2 cents...I dont mean to offend anyone..and yes red I wasnt bashing on you..just making a point)
Click to expand...

I wasn't spinning anything, as I had simply posted what Ford submitted to Congress with it's re-structural plan, and nothing more. And once again, Mulally was asking for a 9 billion line of credit, and had clearly stated that Ford would tap into it, only in the event of economic conditions worsening. Or if either GM or Chrysler were to go under, however Ford did not request any federal bailout cash from Congress whatsoever.


In the meantime, Ford is in the best financial shape out of the domestic big 3 combined, and also stands the best chance of surviving as well !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Yesterday at 4:25 PM
FastDriver
I Have A Gift For Those Seeking Knowledge.
  • 89SportVert
  • Oct 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 8, 2018
89SportVert
Finding My Way Home...
  • stanggirl
  • Nov 9, 2015
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
790
The Welcome Wagon Nov 24, 2015
madspeed
Greetings From Erik At Vivid Racing!!
  • Erik@VividRacing
  • Jul 10, 2014
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
830
The Welcome Wagon Jul 10, 2014
madspeed
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?