• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

X-303 camshaft issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter drummerboy5.0
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2008

drummerboy5.0

New Member
Jan 3, 2008
18
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#1
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #1
couple quick questions..

I'm running a 90 mustang 5.0 with a stock valvetrain, and I am wondering if there would be any piston-to-valve clearance issues with an X-303 camshaft?

do I need different valve springs and/or 1.7 rockers ?

and most importantly, how much vacuum would be lost?

I don't know alot about cams and i'm trying to decide between the ford racing b-303, F-303, and X-303 . I'm pretty sure i'm going to go with the X cam because it sounds the meanest, but any opinions would be greatly appreciated

 
P

PJC Racing

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
199
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#2
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #2
You are going to need to provide more info on your combo to get a good answer.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 3, 2008
#3
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #3
Your going to need to get new springs. Those old stock springs are not going to hold tension long.

To find out if the valve is going to hit the piston with a camshaft like the X cam, you need to check yourself to make sure.

You are likely to loose some vacuum, but I do not have the software to compute that for you.

It is my opinion, the X cam is not matched up to well for good performance. If you do decide to get it, I would atleast advance the camshaft 2 or 4 degrees.

Advancing or retarding the camshaft can gain you a bit...although it compromises your performance and power band.

Doing that changes your piston to valve clearance though.

Advancing the timing opens the intake sooner and closes the exhaust sooner. That will gain you some clearance on the exhaust valve, but you will lose clearance on the intake valve.

Retarding the cam causes the timing to open the intake valve later, and closes the exhaust later. You'll gain clearance on the intake, and lose clearance on the exhaust. So changing the cam timing won't result in increasing clearance on both valves.

So it really all depends on which valve you need the most clearance on.

Basic clearance needed is typically .080" for the intake valve and .100" (1/10th of an inch) for the exhaust valve.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#4
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #4
if your engine is all stock, honestly I would just leave the stock cam in there. Aftermarket heads will definitely increase your gains from getting a bigger cam, so I would wait till then.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 3, 2008
#5
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #5
On an all stock engine you're not going to get anything except a nice exhaust lope sound and poor performance to back it up. An E303 or B303 would be a far better choice if you were to go with another Ford cam.


That said, you should be able to get an X303 in there without PTV clearance issues but it's never a good idea to take someone's word for it.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 4, 2008
#6
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #6
I run the X with a stock bottom end and p/p E7's carbed. Yes it will fit and I did have ample clearance. I however am running an Excellerator open plenum carb intake and have 4.30 gears. If my combo was more stock like yours I wold lean towards the E cam or the B with upped rear gearing. You will need to change the valve springs to a Crane 44308 kit its like $125.00 buck and will keep your bucket alive. Ditch the 1.7's!
 

drummerboy5.0

New Member
Jan 3, 2008
18
0
0
Jan 4, 2008
#7
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #7
PUNISHER RACING
I run the X with a stock bottom end and p/p E7's carbed. Yes it will fit and I did have ample clearance. I however am running an Excellerator open plenum carb intake and have 4.30 gears. If my combo was more stock like yours I wold lean towards the E cam or the B with upped rear gearing. You will need to change the valve springs to a Crane 44308 kit its like $125.00 buck and will keep your bucket alive. Ditch the 1.7's!
Click to expand...

thanks bro that helped alot.

but what difference would upped rear end gearing make? just maximize the performance gains that the different powerband would offer?

and why not go to 1.7's?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 4, 2008
#8
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #8
drummerboy5.0 said:
thanks bro that helped alot.

but what difference would upped rear end gearing make? just maximize the performance gains that the different powerband would offer?

and why not go to 1.7's?
Click to expand...



You don't want 1.7s because you're pushing it with an X303 anyways. At .542 lift (if i remember right) it's already got more lift than you can use with stock heads, so more lift won't do you any good except to rob you of piston to valve clearance.


As for the gear, again your problem is stock heads. You have a cam that wants to scream at 6500RPM and heads that run out of breath around 4500RPM, so throwing a big gear in won't do any good except up to the point where your heads are exhausted. I wouldn't go any higher than 3.73s.
 

fastford91

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
254
1
0
Niagara ,Ontario, Canada
Jan 4, 2008
#9
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #9
if your just doing the cam and nothing else B303 is more than enough! its waste to do the X! to much!!! over kill for stock motor!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 4, 2008
#10
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #10
I imagine with 1.7:1 ratio rockers, and the new .576" lift, it would not surprise me if the valve spring ran into some coil bind.

If you would like to know the new lift by adding or subtracting an rocker arm ratio, it is quite simple.

Take the given lift with the given rocker ratio.

The X-cam has .542" lift with a 1.6 rocker.

.542"/1.6 = .339" Lobe Lift

.339" x 1.7 = .576"
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 5, 2008
#11
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #11
I agree on the B or E cam as well , they sound good to if thats all your after!
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Jan 5, 2008
#12
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #12
5spd GT said:
I imagine with 1.7:1 ratio rockers, and the new .576" lift, it would not surprise me if the valve spring ran into some coil bind.
Click to expand...

For stock springs? Yeah, it would not surprise me if bind happened at even around .525 lift or less.

No matter what cam you decide to get, get new valvesprings to go with it, ones that are matched to the cam. I used the E-303 (.498 lift) with stock valvesprings and it severely weakened them after about 25k miles. I know others have not had issues, but some have so why take any chances you don't want any broken valvesprings or any bind, that's for sure
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 5, 2008
#13
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #13
Fast63 said:
For stock springs? Yeah, it would not surprise me if bind happened at even around .525 lift or less.

No matter what cam you decide to get, get new valvesprings to go with it, ones that are matched to the cam. I used the E-303 (.498 lift) with stock valvesprings and it severely weakened them after about 25k miles. I know others have not had issues, but some have so why take any chances you don't want any broken valvesprings or any bind, that's for sure
Click to expand...


Yeah and even if you didn't get bind, you'll surely get valve float out the ass with stock springs and a X cam.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 6, 2008
#14
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #14
switch out the springs regardless of what cam you use, the added lift and duration will bust them weak stockers up. crane makes a kit for 125.00 bucks and it gives you springs,retainers,and locks, good to .550 lift. part # 44308
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
862
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
973
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
233
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
524
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
HP woes with Sniper Sytem
  • Stang_1973
  • Mar 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
884
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?