• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

X or H pipe on a II

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eos
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
Feb 4, 2004
#21
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #21
Flow Tech Afterburner - fully welde dmuff just like a Flomaster and pretty inexpensive.

If you want glasspacks, put 'em on. i like the way they sounded in my highschool days. It was quite an attention getter. Matter of fact i have some footage of it (can hear it running) i'll try and get put on a wav file or video file so you can hear it. Like I said, the longer the glasspack, the deeper, throatier (and longer lasting, less raspy) they will be.

 

Eos

Oh Heather Oh yeah... I want your pink taco
Jun 13, 2003
734
3
0
oklahoma
Feb 4, 2004
#22
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #22
78Mach1 said:
Not to mention that everyone and thier brother runs Flow's. I know I'm looking at aset of Macs To put on mine for a different sound.
Click to expand...


thats exactly why I want something different. I was told to get some dynomax bullets what about those?
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
Feb 4, 2004
#23
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #23
Dunno, never ran a set. It's my understanding that they are freakin loud. Real close to straight off the header, loud.

I've got Dynomax Super Turbos on my Fastback and on my Duster, only Dynomax muff I've used. They sound superb!

Anyone else used the Bullets?
 
T

Thinkkker

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2000
377
0
16
Midland/Odessa, TX
Feb 4, 2004
#24
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #24
fastmustangII said:
thats exactly why I want something different. I was told to get some dynomax bullets what about those?
Click to expand...

Better than a glass IMHO, though I will tend to think louder. These are actually a RACE muffler. So muffling is to a minimum. I was actually going to go with these on the car *geez I need a complete motor!*

Or you can always go supertrap.... that different and you can "tune" your power with it.
 
N

Northern J II

New Member
Jul 25, 2003
157
0
0
Belwood Ontario Canada
Feb 5, 2004
#25
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #25
I have Flowmasters 40's on the II and Mac Flow paths on the Lincoln Mark VII, I like the sound of both, but the Mac's sound nicer IMO Could be the H.O, They always sound nicer then the "302". (H.O 5.0l has a 351w firing order)
 
N

Northern J II

New Member
Jul 25, 2003
157
0
0
Belwood Ontario Canada
Feb 5, 2004
#26
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #26
Performance wise, a 2 1/2" inch "H" or "X" y-piped into a 3" back to a 3" flowmaster would be easy, and would work well. I ditched the tank, so I could have duel center out-lets (like a Mustang Shelby GT500). Wow factor is high, performance Improvement doughtfull. I just think the Mustang II looked importish with the two pipes out the one side. A Mustang should have true duels in my mind.
 

JonDawg

Mstng2 supplied me with my pair
Founding Member
Aug 4, 2002
422
0
0
See those taillights right in front of you?
Feb 5, 2004
#27
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #27
78Mach1 said:
True, but then you lose the benifit of dual exhaust.
Click to expand...

What are the benefits of duals, anywayz? (besides the coolness factor)
 
7

77sleeper

GO BUCS!
Founding Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,266
0
0
Napalm, AZ
Feb 5, 2004
#28
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #28
JonDawg said:
What are the benefits of duals, anywayz? (besides the coolness factor)
Click to expand...


sounds cooler
 

Eos

Oh Heather Oh yeah... I want your pink taco
Jun 13, 2003
734
3
0
oklahoma
Feb 5, 2004
#29
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #29
my car definetly has to have duals, no question about it. It's a muscle car and Im going to treat it like one.
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
2
47
Vancouver, WA
Feb 5, 2004
#30
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #30
JonDawg said:
What are the benefits of duals, anywayz? (besides the coolness factor)
Click to expand...

From what I gather, It seems as if back in the day (50's) your common autoshops and speed shops didn't have a way of bending large dia pipe (and that size of exh. pipe was pretty much unheard of, especially on a car) so it was far easier on a V8 to just add another pipe of equal size. (and cheaper albeit)
Since that was such a vast improvment in the V8's performance, most car guys in that era saw the dual exhaustas as higher performance engine and in most cases signified it as a V8 powered car.
Also, from a rear stance, there was a sense of equiliberum having 2 pipes in exact locations rather than just one. So yeah it was mainly for looks but in those days was actually a performance upgrade for sure.

Any other thoughts? ?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust April is the worst month
  • Enzio
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
199
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 7, 2026
LILCBRA
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
274
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
320
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
104
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?