• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Your thoughts on CHP Street Fighter stroker kits

  • Thread starter Thread starter CarFreakGT
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2009

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Aug 30, 2009
#1
  • Aug 30, 2009
  • #1
Hello, all. After the better part of a year barely even getting to touch the Mustang, I'm going to be able to start getting my hands dirty again soon. My 68 coupe has a tired 302 in it (87 block), that will eventually be rebuilt or replaced. (Yet to do compression test, etc.) I eventually want it to be a good, fun road car that can be driven hard w/o fear of breaking loose. Some of the first things on the to-do list involve rear end and front suspension work. I am looking down the road at engine mods, though, for planning purposes. I have just started to look at these, but am curious if anyone has any experience w/ either of these kits. If so, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Also, thoughts on strokers in general.

I like basing things on the 302 block to stay nimble, instead of jumping up to a 351. Am I mistaken in my thinking? Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks in advance.

CHP Street Fighter kits:

10666-SF-F331 - Ford 331 Flat Top -4.0cc Street Fighter Engine Kit


10660-SF-F347 - Ford 347 Flat Top -4.0cc Street Fighter Engine Kit
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Aug 30, 2009
#2
  • Aug 30, 2009
  • #2
Personally I'd go the 347, but there are some on here that like the 331.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Aug 30, 2009
#3
  • Aug 30, 2009
  • #3
My buddy bought a turnkey 347 from them he's had waaaaaayyyyyyy better luck then i've had with mine from Ford Performance.Untuned he's running a mid 7's in the 1/8 mile and 1.6X 60 foots on drag radials.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Sep 1, 2009
#4
  • Sep 1, 2009
  • #4
personally, I would prefer the 351 engine.
I really don't care for CHP. The last stroker kit I ordered from them required 3 slugs of malloy to balance the crankshft ($$), and I had to cut .020 from the tops of the pistons to get them at a zero deck height. I told them I had an early Winsor block, but they sent parts for a later 9.5".
Oh well, that's yesterday's news.
 

70dvr

New Member
Jul 25, 2006
46
0
0
Brandon, Florida
Sep 1, 2009
#5
  • Sep 1, 2009
  • #5
I've got a little over 30,000 mile's on one of their 393 short blocks. No complaints.
 

347_stang

New Member
Aug 1, 2009
15
0
0
Albuquerque NM
Sep 1, 2009
#6
  • Sep 1, 2009
  • #6
If you're considering a stroker on a stock 5.0 block I'd say to just save your money and buy a stock 351 for a 1/4 the price.. you'll get the same power/torque roughly and the block itself would be a little stronger than a stock block. why spend all that money only to be limited by the block and than have to rebuild it all over again and pay for all the machining costs twice when you upgrade your block later?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Sep 1, 2009
#7
  • Sep 1, 2009
  • #7
personally i would go with the 331. you get about the same power as an equally built 347, and you dont stress the cylinder walls like a 347 does. that said however, i also recommend going with a 351w instead as it will handle more power than the 302 based engine will, and the weight difference isnt going to be noticable on a street car.
 

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Sep 1, 2009
#8
  • Sep 1, 2009
  • #8
Thanks, everyone, for the input. It's helpful to know that the 351 won't make a big difference for my purposes. Much appreciated, and gives me another option to research.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
884
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
499
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?