steve_stang2003
New Member
- Apr 18, 2007
- 195
- 1
- 0
SaleenGT2001: Does a total toe spec of .32, mean that each side should be exactly .16 each?
Thanks
I just wanted to add to the pool with my .02 experience. I have a similar setup as the OP. MM CC plates, Bilsteins, and Eibach Pros. I used the MM CC guideline for alignment and it did 2 things.
1.) Drastically improved the handeling of my ride around corners.
2.) Wore down the outer edges of my tires in record time.
As for alignment issues, I had mine done by a reputable, local tire center. They had no problem getting it into alignment. But because of the drastic tire wear from an agressive alignment (per MM guidelines) I had them re-adjust it closer to factory spec.
What are the proper factory specs?
SaleenGT2001: Here are the numbers form my last alignment. What problems could an alignment like this cause? Thanks
LF
caster 3.28
camber -1.03
toe .09
RF
caster 4.13
camber -1.13
toe .07
Total toe .16
I just wanted to add to the pool with my .02 experience. I have a similar setup as the OP. MM CC plates, Bilsteins, and Eibach Pros. I used the MM CC guideline for alignment and it did 2 things.
1.) Drastically improved the handeling of my ride around corners.
2.) Wore down the outer edges of my tires in record time.
As for alignment issues, I had mine done by a reputable, local tire center. They had no problem getting it into alignment. But because of the drastic tire wear from an agressive alignment (per MM guidelines) I had them re-adjust it closer to factory spec.
Wow you hit the nail on the head! My front tires are feathering (wearing unevenly) on the inner edges. What should I do to be sure I get rid of the tire wear when I get it realigned? Get the camber closer to -.5 and the toe closer to .16 each? Thanks
the MM specs are WAY better than the ford specs. the -0.5 camber is just fine for normal driving and will not cuause inner edge wear. i would like to see your printout from that alignment. i would be willing to bet that there was too much negative camber.
MM alignment specs are NOT aggressive. the factory specs are more aggressive than the MM ones
(I know I kept it for future reference), but it's lost. All I know is that the MM spec caused edge wear on my tires. I don't dispute the fact that the MM spec is far better than Ford's. When I had it re-done after buying new tires I requested a happy medium between the two. you can do thrust angle alignments... if you have adjustable LCA's... IE: adjustable length not perch height..
Im gonna build some UPR style LCA's... Adjustable length... so ill be doing thrust angle adjustments to make the rear axle square with the car... I guarantee you its not straight