• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

0-60 times are not good, is it me or my car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter serviator
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

serviator

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2001
182
0
16
Denmark (ex-resident of Colorado)
Aug 15, 2004
#1
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #1
I got my Diablo Predator programmer today and it made the car feel different, however since I was out testing the tune I thought I'd do a few 0-60 times and they were not good.

I need some advice from the pro racers in here . You be the judge whether it may be me or the car. I have no problem driving stick, so I doubt that's the problem, but it could be the rpms I'm shifting at? Well, I could not seem to get the car below 7 seconds (it's stock, but still).

First I tried with the traction control on starting around 2000 rpm's and no luck. Then I tried w/o the traction control at approx. 1500 rpm's and another one at 3000 rpm's (the tires just spun at 3000 rpm's). I shifted gear every time at around 4000 rpm's without doing powershifts and just kept getting bad times. It was a fairly hot day (approx. 95 degrees) btw.

What I am doing wrong here?
 

PULMEOVR

I need a bigger E-Penis.
Sep 29, 2003
560
0
27
Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Aug 15, 2004
#2
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #2
Practice launching. You want to give the tires enough power to be on the verge of losing traction. Slip the clutch, don't dump it. Don't run with a full tank of gas. Try to get your runs in on a cooler day and last and most importantly, shift at 5500 RPM!

Hope that helps you out,
Matt
 

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Aug 15, 2004
#3
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #3
What are you using to measure your times with?

No 99-up GT runs a 7.0 0-60 time.

If you are using a G-Tech then that is your problem.
 

BrutalStang

New Member
Aug 2, 2004
261
0
0
PA
Aug 15, 2004
#4
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #4
Red35th said:
What are you using to measure your times with?

No 99-up GT runs a 7.0 0-60 time.

If you are using a G-Tech then that is your problem.
Click to expand...

are you saying no 99+ cant do a 7.0 or better? or are you saying that that is a bad time? please explain that one

i would say you should shift alot higher
 

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Aug 15, 2004
#5
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #5
I am saying that any 99-up GT that clicks off a 7.0 0-60 must have dropped a cylinder.

That is in V-6 territory.

I should have made my statement more clear but that is way to slow for a GT.
 

BrutalStang

New Member
Aug 2, 2004
261
0
0
PA
Aug 15, 2004
#6
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #6
Red35th said:
I am saying that any 99-up GT that clicks off a 7.0 0-60 must have dropped a cylinder.

That is in V-6 territory.

I should have made my statement more clear but that is way to slow for a GT.
Click to expand...

thanks for clearing that one up cause i agree
 

ZaC851

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
270
0
17
Birmingham, AL
Aug 15, 2004
#7
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #7
Shift closer to redline. Thats the only problem I see
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Aug 15, 2004
#8
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #8
A stock GT with a manual transmission can run 0-60 mph in 5.5 seconds. These results are listed on a website that posts the 0-60 mph times and 1/4 mile times of a variety of cars: www.ssmoparmuscle.com
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Aug 15, 2004
#9
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #9
The real racers are going to tell you 0-60mph is just car-selling, magazine headline

The 60' at the drag strip is what matters.
 

serviator

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2001
182
0
16
Denmark (ex-resident of Colorado)
Aug 15, 2004
#10
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #10
Thank for the tips. I forgot to mention that I live at a fairly high altitude (1 mile/Denver), so that affects it a bit but I don't believe it justifies those times though.

I ran with a full tank yesterday and it sounds like my launches needs practice, so I am going to try that out today as well as shifting at higher rpm's.

I measured the times using a good old stop watch. I just let it run the seconds and hit the gas at a round number and looked again at 60. I know it is not the most accurate way of measuring, but then again, it doesn't take me 1-2 seconds to look from the road to the watch.

Anyway, I am glad I got some tips. I am going to try them out today and see if I can improve. If not, then the 3.73 gears coming as well as the underdrive pullies and hopefully the stage cams will help .
 
M

ModularMike281

New Member
Apr 27, 2003
51
0
0
Miami Lakes, FL
Aug 15, 2004
#11
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #11
serviator said:
Anyway, I am glad I got some tips. I am going to try them out today and see if I can improve. If not, then the 3.73 gears coming as well as the underdrive pullies and hopefully the stage cams will help .
Click to expand...

First off someone said it right 0-60 times are only used to sell cars, secondly you need a Gtech to get a more accurate time, what year/model of mustang do you have? You need to shift it right on redline IMO. Last thing more power is not the resolution to your problem your driving is what needs improvement (slip out the cluch and ease into the throttle do not just stomp on it)you need to be able to run atleast 2.2- 2.0 60 footers in stock trim (stock tires and all) before you start modding the car that way ull always get the best out of every mod. If all else fails sticky tires are always an option.
 
3

3.8L_of_Pain

New Member
Jul 4, 2004
123
0
0
Southern California -- Orange County
Aug 15, 2004
#12
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #12
01mgvert said:
A stock GT with a manual transmission can run 0-60 mph in 5.5 seconds. These results are listed on a website that posts the 0-60 mph times and 1/4 mile times of a variety of cars: www.ssmoparmuscle.com
Click to expand...
Thanks, that link is off the hook.
 
3

3.8L_of_Pain

New Member
Jul 4, 2004
123
0
0
Southern California -- Orange County
Aug 15, 2004
#13
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #13
serviator said:
Thank for the tips. I forgot to mention that I live at a fairly high altitude (1 mile/Denver), so that affects it a bit but I don't believe it justifies those times though.
Click to expand...
I ran some back-of-the-envelope calculations based on your actual track conditions of 95 degF and 5250 ft elevation. Correcting to sea level and 68 degF would cut a calculated 0.82 sec from your 0-60 mph time, taking you to about 6.2 sec. But you still have a 6.2 sec - 5.5 = 0.7 sec gap to published values.

As others suggested, practice your launching and shift points. Of course, the stopwatch measurement has uncertainty, but try to start it just as the car moves and stop it just as the needle hits sixty. People's reaction times make this even more tricky.
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Aug 15, 2004
#14
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #14
I live in colorado as well and my car gets up and goes very quick, I'd say 5 seconds? But thats with the same meathod as you except some one else watching the clock. I dont have many mods, but the difference between here and Texas is not that noticable at least not to me.
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Aug 15, 2004
#15
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #15
serviator said:
Thank for the tips. I forgot to mention that I live at a fairly high altitude (1 mile/Denver), so that affects it a bit but I don't believe it justifies those times though.

I ran with a full tank yesterday and it sounds like my launches needs practice, so I am going to try that out today as well as shifting at higher rpm's.

I measured the times using a good old stop watch. I just let it run the seconds and hit the gas at a round number and looked again at 60. I know it is not the most accurate way of measuring, but then again, it doesn't take me 1-2 seconds to look from the road to the watch.

Anyway, I am glad I got some tips. I am going to try them out today and see if I can improve. If not, then the 3.73 gears coming as well as the underdrive pullies and hopefully the stage cams will help .
Click to expand...
Dude that stop watch timing thing isnt working. Do u know how fast a .1 pass by, the time it takes u to look at your watch at 60 could take .2-.4 alone. So on a more accurate note u r probably running a 6.5 or so right now. The G-tech isnt the most accurate, but its gotta be better than the stop watch. If you re drvg a 5-speed, I know for a fact u should be running at least a 14.0, just gotta keep working on the launching. Thats 1 thing I like about my car at the track, just stomp and go. Manuals are fun and can be consistent, but autos are consistent and can be fun. Ha Ha Ha
 

serviator

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2001
182
0
16
Denmark (ex-resident of Colorado)
Aug 15, 2004
#16
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #16
ModularMike281, I appreciate your description of the technique I have to use. I'll try the tips out and see if I get the perfect launch, because I am sure I need to learn something.

3.8L_of_Pain, it was great that you did that calculation, which explains part of why I feel so slow (the other part probably being my launches). Though "myponyrocks" you don't feel the difference, you probably have more mods than me? (I only have the Diablo Predator Programmer and K&N filter)

big T, you are right about the inaccuracy. I may bring a light person in my car, so they can check my time and again - practice the launches.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Aug 15, 2004
#17
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #17
The 60' timing beam at the track is pretty damn accurate
 
K

Kevin2811

New Member
May 10, 2004
93
0
0
Panama City FL
Aug 15, 2004
#18
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #18
Did I read the post right that you were shifting at 4000 RPM?
 

StngStr

Member
Jun 24, 2003
616
0
17
Central Florida
Aug 15, 2004
#19
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #19
take it to the track and see what it runs. Otherwise, you're just wasting our time with a thread like this.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 15, 2004
#20
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #20
Shift faster and later
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
620
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
380
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
480
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
614
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
Other Auto Tech Jun 13, 2026
427nostang
4
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?