• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

0-60 times

  • Thread starter Thread starter #1stangFAN
  • Start date Start date Jul 22, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jul 22, 2009
#1
  • Jul 22, 2009
  • #1
So i have my 4.10's and i intalled my c&l intake with tunes from bamachips last night so me and a friend decided to time some 0-60's. Now give me a break that im new to my GT but my fastest time was 5.77 but even though i have an auto it should be lower right? It was suprisingly disappointing because i was looking at some stats online and i should be running 5.3 stock. It got me really frustrated but is this just because of my driving skill or is this somewhat accurate? But at the same time it put a smile on my face to burnout in 3 gears.

heres the website i got the stock time from.2005 Mustang | The Essential Guide To Muscle Cars
 
F

fordracefan

New Member
Mar 3, 2009
4
0
1
Wenztville, MO
Jul 22, 2009
#2
  • Jul 22, 2009
  • #2
I believe those numbers are for an automatic.
 

GreyDiesel

New Member
Jul 26, 2008
167
1
0
Denver, CO
Jul 22, 2009
#3
  • Jul 22, 2009
  • #3
Where are you located geographically?

What method are you using to record the time?
 

ct07gt

Member
Feb 14, 2008
377
0
16
Jul 23, 2009
#4
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #4
Most magazines use a 1' rollout, meaning they don't start timing until after the car has traveled 1' which could make a difference of a couple tenths. They probably use a dedicated test track which probably has pretty good grip as well.
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Jul 23, 2009
#5
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #5
Traction is a huge variable. If you're spinning in the first three gears, that's wasted acceleration.

With drag radials mounted the last day I was at our local track, my supercharged 07 GT automatic ran 0-60 mph in 3.7 seconds (and 0-100 mph in 9.9 seconds). If I didn't have the drag radials on, it would be a lot worse from all the tire spin. Having lots of power is useless without the traction to harness it all.
 

One2One

New Member
Jul 14, 2009
18
0
0
Hinesville ga
Jul 23, 2009
#6
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #6
street racing.... 0-60 times you should use manual.. but when u are doing 1/4 mile times u are better with auto
 

Lotion

New Member
Oct 30, 2008
23
0
0
Rockford Illinois
Jul 23, 2009
#7
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #7
Curious about how a vert was .1 second quicker in the 0-60. Not a big thing but i always thought the vert was a bit heavier due to the added support?
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jul 23, 2009
#8
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #8
One2One said:
street racing.... 0-60 times you should use manual.. but when u are doing 1/4 mile times u are better with auto
Click to expand...

Just curious but why is that because if you have an auto with a good tune dont you accelerate better because when your transmission shifts it goes right back into the power band almost perfectly while with a manual there is chance for more error? or am i mistaken?

ct07gt said:
Most magazines use a 1' rollout, meaning they don't start timing until after the car has traveled 1' which could make a difference of a couple tenths. They probably use a dedicated test track which probably has pretty good grip as well.
Click to expand...

and thanks when i get the chance ill try this, any other tips?
 

One2One

New Member
Jul 14, 2009
18
0
0
Hinesville ga
Jul 23, 2009
#9
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #9
Just curious but why is that because if you have an auto with a good tune dont you accelerate better because when your transmission shifts it goes right back into the power band almost perfectly while with a manual there is chance for more error? or am i mistaken?
Click to expand...

1- acceleration
2- perfet shifting(depends on the driver)
3-Lunch can be much higher

My 0-60 used to be 5.5 when i was 100% stock
 
O

o0Dan0o

Founding Member
Feb 8, 2001
485
1
0
Jul 24, 2009
#10
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #10
How are you timing it. If you're doing it with a stop watch your times could be half a second off or more pretty easily.
Dan
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jul 24, 2009
#11
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #11
how can you get the best launch with an automatic? because all i was trying to do was hold the brake and rev my engine as high as i could without spinning tires and let go of the brake
 

One2One

New Member
Jul 14, 2009
18
0
0
Hinesville ga
Jul 24, 2009
#12
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #12
#1stangFAN said:
how can you get the best launch with an automatic? because all i was trying to do was hold the brake and rev my engine as high as i could without spinning tires and let go of the brake
Click to expand...

when i used to have my rx8 i used to lunch it about 3k same with the mustang(2.5k) but the rx8 used to be automatic and got the racing pedal next to the stearing wheel, so u can control the car as manual without the clutch.. anyways i used to lunched it in neutral.. then quicklest i could put it in M(racing mode)

i dont know if the auto mustang has the electronic brake the one that doesnt let u pass the 2k rpm.. but if it doesnt u should just press the break and lunch it
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jul 25, 2009
#13
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #13
what do you mean by electronic brake?
 

One2One

New Member
Jul 14, 2009
18
0
0
Hinesville ga
Jul 26, 2009
#14
  • Jul 26, 2009
  • #14
#1stangFAN said:
what do you mean by electronic brake?
Click to expand...

Im not sure thats the specific name but is when u press the brake and the gas on auto and doesnt let u pass over 2k rpm
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jul 26, 2009
#15
  • Jul 26, 2009
  • #15
no it doesnt have that
 
F

FordTaurusSHO94

Member
Apr 14, 2003
110
0
16
Jul 26, 2009
#16
  • Jul 26, 2009
  • #16
You mean a torque converter? It's also launch, not lunch, lol.

0-60 times aren't a good measurement for anything, IMO. Every magazine does it different. I've seen 05+ cars range from 4.9 to 5.5. Track times are the best measurement of straight line acceleration.
 
S

ski

Member
Dec 14, 2004
380
2
18
Jul 26, 2009
#17
  • Jul 26, 2009
  • #17
Many variables affect acceleration times, like traction(burning rubber in 3 gears is not helping your times as previously mentioned), altitude(high elevation slows accel.), ambient temperature(hot air slows accel.), relative humidity(juicy air slows accel.), manufacturing and assembly tolerances(a factory freak accelerates faster), etc.
If you performed the 5.77 sec. test during the heat of the day with a fully heatsoaked engine, then you may be able to decrease it by allowing the engine to completely cool down, disconnecting the battery for 30 minutes and reconnecting it to clear the PCM's adaptive learning data, and doing a 0-60 test with the engine only partially warmed up either in the early morning or at night when the ambient temp is cooler.
 
0

05stanggtowner

New Member
Apr 30, 2009
12
0
0
Jul 26, 2009
#18
  • Jul 26, 2009
  • #18
ive got an 05 auto with a custom tune,underdrive pullies,4.10 gears, CAI,exhaust, and steeda motion charge plates....and my local track i recorded a 4.6 second 0-60 time
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jul 27, 2009
#19
  • Jul 27, 2009
  • #19
05stanggtowner said:
ive got an 05 auto with a custom tune,underdrive pullies,4.10 gears, CAI,exhaust, and steeda motion charge plates....and my local track i recorded a 4.6 second 0-60 time
Click to expand...

wow, where do you live? what was the weather like when you tested it? how did you time it? what tune do you use (bama, brenspeed, ect, 93 octane?) ? and how do you launch since its an auto like mine and all
 
0

05stanggtowner

New Member
Apr 30, 2009
12
0
0
Jul 27, 2009
#20
  • Jul 27, 2009
  • #20
first off i live in north carolina it was 68 degrees when i was at the track i got a custom 93 octane tune at a local shop...at the strip they hooked my car up to some kind of accelerometer thing. all i did was hold on the brake and then floored it no real technique...the biggest thing is it needs to be a cool night or something for the best time
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
400
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
206
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Friday at 9:26 AM
squeak93
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
924
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
B
Hatchback Glass Molding
  • bluestang347
  • Jul 30, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
674
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2024
bluestang347
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?