• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

00-02 GT Vs 88 5.0 ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter MyCARneedsHelp
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2004

MyCARneedsHelp

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
658
0
16
Plainfield,IL
Jan 4, 2004
#1
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #1
My friend has a 01 i think, may be a 02. And i have a 88 5.0. Both are stock and auto'z . Who would win ?
 

MadMatt5oh

Member
Jan 10, 2003
441
0
16
St Paul, MN
Jan 4, 2004
#2
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #2
01
 

HO93LX302

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2002
715
0
0
Naugatuck,CT
Jan 4, 2004
#3
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #3
Good question could be close but I would have to put my money on your buddy no offense.. You will probably take him a little at the beging cuz the 5.0's have more torque but the higher hp will help him beat ya cuz his will rev higer then yours.. Plus auto's suck but that 4r70w in the 01 or 02 is good specially when manually shifted.. I've chirped gears easily with new mustangs at work that were auto's
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 4, 2004
#4
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #4
Second the 01...the auto would probably run a 14.1 to 14.3
 

Icepick

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
378
0
0
Ft Lauderdale
Jan 4, 2004
#5
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #5
The 01
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
Jan 4, 2004
#6
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #6
get some gears,exhaust,torque converter with a 2500 stall and it might be a different story
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Jan 4, 2004
#7
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #7
i agree with above post
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 4, 2004
#8
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #8
Not really a fair race. 260 horsepower to 225. seeing that his car prolly runs in the 14.3 range and you in the 15.3 range. (mabye worse)
 

MadMatt5oh

Member
Jan 10, 2003
441
0
16
St Paul, MN
Jan 4, 2004
#9
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #9
Ok, he is outmatched by horsepower and technology with a better automatic. Im not sure but I think he'd see better than a 15 in his 88' wouldnt he? Speed densitys are the fastest stockers. I may be biased but the last thing I would do is go MAF because of that fact. I'd wait until it was needed to keep up with upgrades
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,251
17,936
224
Massachusetts
Jan 4, 2004
#10
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #10
I went 14.8 @ 93MPH bone stock in my '88 AOD car.

The '01 would prob run 14.1-14.3 stock.

Driver's could come into play though. A good start can make up the half second difference easily.
 

MyCARneedsHelp

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
658
0
16
Plainfield,IL
Jan 4, 2004
#11
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #11
Well i get a used 3:73 rear end from drum to drum from Stangparts.Com next week. Will that help any?
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
Jan 4, 2004
#12
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #12
yes it will, but with an AOD i would go with 4.10's, but 3.73's are a good start, and just to make sure you have removed the air silencer, right?
 

Icepick

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
378
0
0
Ft Lauderdale
Jan 4, 2004
#13
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #13
My 90 vert bone stock except for 4.10's went a 15.8 with no tire spin at all.
 
S

Smokin5oh

Founding Member
May 22, 2000
124
0
0
Mississippi
Jan 4, 2004
#14
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #14
My 89 LX vert went 14.7's with 3.55's and flowmasters. I ran five times that nite and ran 14.7x each time! Talk about consistent!!!!

But still have to put my money on the Newer car.
 

MyCARneedsHelp

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
658
0
16
Plainfield,IL
Jan 4, 2004
#15
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #15
im not keepin the AOD, im swappin a t-5 or maybe if i have the money a C-6 in the summer. I didnt remove it but i checked and didnt see one, maybe the guy before me did that.
 

5 Liter Mustang

New Member
Aug 17, 2003
119
0
0
Jan 4, 2004
#16
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #16
the 01 is definitely faster...

but, depending on conditions, you could still win..
for example.. if his gas tank is full, and yours is near empty, that would increase your wieght advantage. Also, driver weight, condition of tires, driver skill, reaction time, how good your particular car is running, etc.. there's a lot that goes into play..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
High 2k idle(1988 Mustang GT 5.0 non maf)
  • BurtHurts75
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
302
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 29, 2025
BurtHurts75
B
P
Electrical 1988 GT Wrong Cluster- causing electrical issues?
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
311
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
pindude80
P
2
02 mustang gt crank no start
  • 2v.cjmullis
  • Jan 28, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
334
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2026
Noobz347
D
Fox 88 foxbody no power to red and black wire at fuel pump relay
  • drod88
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
341
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 2, 2025
Mcmahst
Engine 1987 GT 5.0
  • Mindseye007
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
419
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?