• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

03 Cobra Vs Coyote

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pit Bos
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#21
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #21
Let's just assume that for arguments sake any swapped coyote will ditch the stock rev and shift points. I agree though I feel the new gt's almost feel antiseptic with how governed they are.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 2, 2016
#22
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #22
I know the coyote class fox bodies run 10's and shift around 8000rpms. Also the new cars weigh another few hundred lbs. Really it all costs about the same for certain power levels. Your turbo windsor is making gobs of torque/hp but you're also at the edge of when it's going to break and you're limited on making much more power with those heads. A coyote with a turbo...uh not even close....and I'm a pushrod motor guy! A properly built setup designed to make 700+ AND run a long time=$$ no matter what.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Mar 2, 2016
#23
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #23
A5literMan said:
I know the coyote class fox bodies run 10's and shift around 8000rpms. Also the new cars weigh another few hundred lbs. Really it all costs about the same for certain power levels. Your turbo windsor is making gobs of torque/hp but you're also at the edge of when it's going to break and you're limited on making much more power with those heads. A coyote with a turbo...uh not even close....and I'm a pushrod motor guy! A properly built setup designed to make 700+ AND run a long time=$$ no matter what.
Click to expand...

Turbo 302*


But it's going to be dart blocked before too terrible long, and gain some cubes. When that happens, i dare a coyote.


Edit: I know i sound like I'm picking on them, I'll say this- i understand the dart costs way more and i get the bang for the buck thing. I'd like to have a new car, i just don't think I'm going to part with my pushrods. Sorry for the derail.
 
Last edited: Mar 2, 2016
Reactions: A5literMan

smokin joe

Founding Member
Sep 30, 2000
746
45
49
Dallas,TX
Mar 2, 2016
#24
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #24
When I'm ready to replace my worn out stock 302 I plan to go Coyote since I have nothing to transfer to a new pushrod build.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#25
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #25
I would love to say I plan to go coyote and if it was a competition level car then it would be a no brainer. Something about a pushrod Fox still gets me excited. It would be tough for me to drop a dohc between the towers. Call it nostalgia, I dunno
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter and Boosted92LX

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Mar 2, 2016
#26
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #26
Love my FRPP crate coyote swapped 89 vert! 400 hp to the wheels outta the box, 7,000 plus rpm capable.
Runs like a new car and screams like a, well you just dont get any better

It aint cheap done correctly.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Mar 2, 2016
#27
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #27
stykthyn said:
I would love to say I plan to go coyote and if it was a competition level car then it would be a no brainer. Something about a pushrod Fox still gets me excited. It would be tough for me to drop a dohc between the towers. Call it nostalgia, I dunno
Click to expand...

I'm with you. The old 302 may not be as smooth or as powerful as the new coyote, but it's simple, compact, and parts are readily available and dirt cheap. Plus, with so many cylinder heads, camshafts, and intakes available, it's rare to see two setups exactly the same. They're simple to build, which gives me the pride of pointing at my 306 and telling them I built it by hand.
 
Reactions: stykthyn

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#28
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #28
I would love to see more new product though, but the Windsor is a dinosaur now.
A plug and play edis kit that would allow a 1pc intake and coil on plug applications would be tits. I don't see why new technology can't breathe more life into these engines.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 2, 2016
#29
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #29
Jason 302 said:
I'm with you. The old 302 may not be as smooth or as powerful as the new coyote, but it's simple, compact, and parts are readily available and dirt cheap. Plus, with so many cylinder heads, camshafts, and intakes available, it's rare to see two setups exactly the same. They're simple to build, which gives me the pride of pointing at my 306 and telling them I built it by hand.
Click to expand...

try getting 400 reliable rwhp and 25mpg out of a stock block windsor pushrod motor.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 2, 2016
#30
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #30
The old 302 OHV was a gem back in its day, but I've never seen one running around with any level of aftermarket support that churned out 435hp in N/A trim, started and and idled smooth as glass, could be lugged around at 1,000 RPM with perfect manners around town, could achieve near 30mpg and would do it it all without giving the smog police fits.

I would smash a 302 OHV to pieces with a hammer and nail it's dead carcass to the wall with its own pushrods if that meant I could replace it dollar for dollar with a Coyote.

And if I could do it all again, that's exactly what I might have done instead of building up a stock block stroker in my coupe.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#31
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #31
Well if engine reliability and comfort was what I was after I could source a newer gt and not worry about an archaic suspension, interior, or drive controls.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Mar 2, 2016
#32
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #32
Gearbanger 101 said:
The old 302 OHV was a gem back in its day, but I've never seen one running around with any level of aftermarket support that churned out 435hp in N/A trim, started and and idled smooth as glass, could be lugged around at 1,000 RPM with perfect manners around town, could achieve near 30mpg and would do it it all without giving the smog police fits.

I would smash a 302 OHV to pieces with a hammer and nail it's dead carcass to the wall with its own pushrods if that meant I could replace it dollar for dollar with a Coyote.

And if I could do it all again, that's exactly what I might have done instead of building up a stock block stroker in my coupe.
Click to expand...

Exactly why I went coyote, and with full AC, PS and hydroboost and the brake and suspension upgrades we all do, its a cool fox body with a full drivetrain transplant. And you have a super nice ride Brian.
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Mar 2, 2016
#33
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #33
Jason 302 said:
The old 302 may not be as smooth or as powerful as the new coyote.
Click to expand...

mikestang63 said:
try getting 400 reliable rwhp and 25mpg out of a stock block windsor pushrod motor.
Click to expand...

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Mar 2, 2016
#34
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #34
Aftermarket means nothing in this case.
Both engines are more than capable and have plenty of available aftermarket parts.
In reality all anyone does is stuff them full of boost anyway. Heads and cams aren't cost effective for the power you get from them unless you are shooting for the stars.

While the coyote is cheaper out of the box, it has no factory SC.
The 03 cobra you slap a $75 pulley on it with a tune and you are making 485rwhp and 500ftlbs (literally).

The 03 cobra needs no headers, no standalone kit, no aftermarket SC ($5500 for a coyote) and no bracketry to make the accessories work.

The coyote is good for what, about 420rwhp high 300's in torque with bolts ons and tune without spending any SC or h/c money?
The 03 cobra setup comes in 60rwhp and 100ftlbs higher with just a pulley.

The $5500 SC is what kills the coyote idea for me, that's about a grand less than I spent on my entire engine.
If you bought a coyote crate to get the warranty, that's $6500+ the standalone, then the SC voids the warranty.

For the record it only took about 8 wires to make the 03 cobra engine run with the computer. You can also install a distributer (I think MMR sells it) in the drivers side valve cover connected to one of the cams and run the fox computer.

I like the coyote engine, I just don't see the value in swapping one into a fox.
Edit: Let me rephrase that, if its power you are after it's not a great value.

No matter how you slice it, a pullied terminator engine is cheaper and makes more power and torque.
 
Last edited: Mar 2, 2016

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 2, 2016
#35
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #35
So 302 builds with high quality components are cheap? I had 4500$ in my h/c/i with MAF/tb/inj. And still was 50 or so horsepower short of a coyote. It sure wouldn't idle like stock or pull 25mpg. Not saying a coyote swap is cheap. There is more to it than just the motor but compared to a stroker 302 build...id go coyote.
 
Reactions: mikestang63

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 2, 2016
#36
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #36
stykthyn said:
Well if engine reliability and comfort was what I was after I could source a newer gt and not worry about an archaic suspension, interior, or drive controls.
Click to expand...
Is that your way of admitting your car is a pile?
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Mar 2, 2016
#37
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #37
I'm dying to see proof of all of these 400 >>>RWHP<<<< coyotes.. sorry, I'm not buying it. These are 420hp engines, folks....
 
Reactions: stykthyn

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Mar 2, 2016
#38
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #38
Since when did we start building these cars with gas mileage in mind ? The Money spent on a coyote isn't cost effective yet for the regular guy. I've got a lot of money in my 331 build but its been over a few years. Since before people knew the limit was about 500hp on a boosted stock block. The only powerplant I'll be seeing is some form of dart block.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter and stykthyn

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#39
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #39
Gearbanger 101 said:
Is that your way of admitting your car is a pile?
Click to expand...
I've.never denied I have a squeaky chit box
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Mar 2, 2016
#40
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #40
stykthyn said:
I've.never denied I have a squeaky chit box
Click to expand...

So you need someone to give it to???
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
116
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
612
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
209
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
H
Drivetrain 6R80 to t56 swap
  • Holymoses
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
250
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
Sound deadener install
  • limp
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
176
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?