• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

03 GT converting to 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter CENTENNIALSTANG
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
C

CENTENNIALSTANG

Member
Apr 15, 2005
0
0
16
Houston
Aug 21, 2006
#1
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #1
Ok guys i blew my GT motor up lol. I wana do a 5.0 motor maybe a 331 or sumthing bad ass im also gona put a single turbo on her and C4 tranny. How much will just converting my car over for the 5.0 cost. Money isnt a biggy just time. thanx :SNSign:


IM sorry mod motors
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 22, 2006
#2
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #2
Cheap route would be to set it up using a carb, and forget about fuel injection. You can run a turbo with the correct carb setup (beleive its called blow through???) and that would be bad ass. No one would expect that, lol.

If you want fuel injection then the biggest PITA is gonna be wiring it up. Keep in mind itll fit just fine, think of the Saleen S-351's in our body style... oh my GOD!!!
 
T

Torinalth

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
952
0
16
Clayton NC
Aug 22, 2006
#3
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #3
MM k-member, control arms, coilovers for a start... prolly need a crossmember for the C4... thats all i can help with being the suspension side... i know nothing of 5.0 motors so someone else will need to help.

T
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 22, 2006
#4
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #4
If money is not an issue, but time is... I would say your best bet is to stay modular, do an aluminum block 302BB or 324 BB/stroker setup and turbo that. That seems to be your best bet for a direct swap.

Swapping back to a 5.0 pushrod may or may not turn out to be a lot of work. For one, you need new motor mounts, all the stuff Torinalth said, your accessory hookups will all be different, you'll need a new midpipe, and it definitely will not be emissions legal if its carbed. Plus I think since the engine is older than the car itself, it wouldn't pass a visual inspection but I'm not sure (don't know how inspections work where you live). Then you have to factor in block strength... you'll need a Dart block (or similar) to prevent splitting once you start upping the boost. Just seems like a big PITA to me
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Aug 22, 2006
#5
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #5
4.6L Mod > 5.0

But seriously you would be alot better off just rebuilding your current motor. It will take 1/10 of the time to comlete and probably will not be much more expensive.
 
M

my95gtstang

New Member
May 9, 2004
76
0
0
Chesapeake, VA
Aug 22, 2006
#6
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #6
i was thinking about converting to a 5.0 but the cost isnt worth it. just get a remanufactored motor from jasper, Titan Engines *ebay stores* PROMAR Precision engines *ebay store* or Egines Direct *ebay store* and they are for a damn good price.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Aug 22, 2006
#7
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #7
Please it's 2006 do not run a carb

Fuel injection offers the same amount if not more power potential without the driveability inefficiencies that always plagued carbed cars.

would you feel comfortable wiring a EEC IV car from scratch? I think your best bet would be to find a 94-95 5.0 car and take the entire harness out of it and take lots of pictures so you can see where all the grounds are and such..

BTW I don't blame you for wanting to go with a 5.0 based motor. the 3.55 bore on the 4.6 = crap..
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Aug 22, 2006
#8
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #8
plus depending on where you are in the country, that swap is not legal.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 22, 2006
#9
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #9
bdcardinal said:
plus depending on where you are in the country, that swap is not legal.
Click to expand...

stated above
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Aug 22, 2006
#10
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #10
Can u run carb set up in our car and still pass emission?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Aug 22, 2006
#11
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #11
no. carbs were phased out before OBD2, and actually will not work with a factory OBD2. if you tuned it right you MIGHT pass tailpipe, but no way you would pass visual or a computer scan check.
 
C

CENTENNIALSTANG

Member
Apr 15, 2005
0
0
16
Houston
Aug 22, 2006
#12
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #12
mity2 said:
Can u run carb set up in our car and still pass emission?
Click to expand...


I live in NM no one cares at all what you do to your car. But i was thinking about it most of the day and i think im gona stay modular but do the stroker kit to it. Much easier and if im mistaken correct me, but if i blow lots of money on a stroker then boost it.Then spend lots on the 5.0 motor it wont have that much of a power difference.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Aug 22, 2006
#13
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #13
CENTENNIALSTANG said:
I live in NM no one cares at all what you do to your car. But i was thinking about it most of the day and i think im gona stay modular but do the stroker kit to it. Much easier and if im mistaken correct me, but if i blow lots of money on a stroker then boost it.Then spend lots on the 5.0 motor it wont have that much of a power difference.
Click to expand...


Don't go stroker.. go big bore.. the mod motors biggest problem is lack of bore.. put it this way STOCk our bore/stroke ratio is worse than a 302 based 347.. If you don't beleive me ask around the internet.. almost all the top modular guys will tell you big bore is the way to go.. I don't mean asking engine shops.. go to the boars and find the most knowledgeable guys that are not trying to sell you somthing and see what they have to say.

One of the biggest problems with the samll bore design is that it limits us to small valves. even with stock size valves you will show better gains from a BB than a stroker. take a look at the valve size of 302 heads out there compared to the modular heads. this is because the bore size on a 302 is 4.00 compared to our 3.55
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Aug 22, 2006
#14
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #14
If money REALLY isn't a problem. You can't go wrong with Sean Hyland's 5.0 Cammer. Leaves room for boring too.

http://www.seanhylandmotorsport.com/frppcrate/M6007T50EA.shtml

I know someone on here hates Sean Hyland, I think its TomMustang
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Aug 22, 2006
#15
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #15
Money no prob? get the new 5.4 ford has But seriously just buy a 4v dohc and maybe bore it and change the compression to like 8.4 or sumthing b4 u turbo it. Saves u a whole bunch of time and frustration with electronix
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Aug 22, 2006
#16
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #16
UDTBadkarma said:
If money REALLY isn't a problem. You can't go wrong with Sean Hyland's 5.0 Cammer. Leaves room for boring too.

http://www.seanhylandmotorsport.com/frppcrate/M6007T50EA.shtml

I know someone on here hates Sean Hyland, I think its TomMustang
Click to expand...


Yeah tom likes sean hyland about as much as he likes new jersey. BTW where is tom?
 
T

Torinalth

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
952
0
16
Clayton NC
Aug 22, 2006
#17
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #17
he poped up once in the Ot forum in general reciently... aside from that i dunno.... getting annoyed that i cant even get suspension theory bounced off anyone since both he and San dont like my threads

SHM is awesome if you dump a LOAD of cash on them at once.... if you nickle and dime then yeah, yer not going to be happy. remember, its the huge jobs that MIGHT get into a Magazine or gain renown at the track.

Torinalth
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Aug 23, 2006
#18
  • Aug 23, 2006
  • #18
svttech76 said:
Yeah tom likes sean hyland about as much as he likes new jersey. BTW where is tom?
Click to expand...

Hey now, im from jersey
 
M

my95gtstang

New Member
May 9, 2004
76
0
0
Chesapeake, VA
Aug 23, 2006
#19
  • Aug 23, 2006
  • #19
Stroking a 4.6 to a 5.0 is not a bad choice. I am doing it but i have yet to begin on it. I have been researching, its not as common but it is do-able and doesnt cost that much. The kit itself is only around 900-1100 off ebay stores which is really nice. Trust me, research into stroking the 4.6 to a 5.0 and you will be impressed. The only thing is that not many people have done it so finding out exact dyno numbers and stuff like that is going to be difficult. Once i begin mine i am going to take pics the entire way and then list all the parts and all the info so that if someone else wants to do it, they have something to go off of. let me know what you decide to do. later man and good luck.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Aug 23, 2006
#20
  • Aug 23, 2006
  • #20
I have heard many, many people say that the mod motor needs bore not stroke. Matter of fact SVTTech who is a highly experienced Ford tech said it in this very thread See post #13 in this thread ^
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Expired 94 Mustang GT 5.0 HO Convertible Automatic for sale
  • DeanS
  • Aug 7, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
8
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jan 16, 2025
JeffVoigt
J
M
For Sale Garaged 1987 Foxbody V8 GT 5.0 Convertible, Automatic, white and silver paint with white leather interior $17,000 obo
  • michaelS
  • Jun 8, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 5, 2023
michaelS
M
R
94 5.0 or 2002 gt convertible
  • rich1374670x
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 18, 2019
rich1374670x
R
L
New to me 1988 GT Convertible.
  • lemosley1973
  • Mar 2, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 9, 2019
lemosley1973
L
G
New member. 1988 mustang GT.
  • Guccijayda
  • May 16, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2019
Guccijayda
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?