Cobra18 said:Does anyone have the 1/4 Mile and 0 to 60's for the 04 and 05 GT's?
Cobra18 said:Autos, sorry.
Mr_dcj2001 said:Skyline?
351CJ said:It's a high performance coupe that Nissian sells in Japan. I brought it up sarcastically because in one of the other threads some Bozo started ranting about how much better the Skyline is than an '05 GT - like a car sold only in Japan and would cost $50K if imported to the US matters to any of us here.
MT ran 14.0s with 5.4s 0-60 in a 1999 GT (5 speed though)351CJ said:The 05 Auto GT is WAY faster than an 05 auto GT because the 05 trannie has 5 speeds instead of the 4 speeds that the 04 has. 1st gear on the '05 is much lower, 3.31:1 vs. 2.84:1 for the 05.
M/T reported 0-60 of 5.1 seconds and 13.6 for the 1/4.
C&D ran 0-60 @ 6.3 sec. and 15.1 for the 1/4 in a 2002 GT coupe.
C&D ran 0-60 @ 6.0 sec. & 14.7 in the 1/4 for a 2001 GT vert.
Don't ask me to explain how C&D ran faster in the Vert other than the 2002 coupe they had was a dog as C&D corrects their times for altitude, temperature, humidity etc and usually they run their times at the same track.
Silver02GT said:The guys at MM&FF got a stock 01 GT fresh from the factory to turn a 13.71!!
RE: page 117 of May 2002 issue.
351CJ said:1. That car was a manual trannie. The original question was about automatics.
2. They had a hot shoe driver who is better than 99.9% of everyone else
3. The first run was 14.986 bone stock. The very best run they pulled stock was 14.218 - air pressures adjusted, car left to cool down.
4.The 13.721 was run after the car was modded.
front sway bar disconnected
spare tire & jack removed
front tires @ 46 PSI
Rear tire pressure lowered
Air silencer & filter housing removed
Intake manifold packed with ice before the run.
Yea, I'm sure that's exactly the way you drive your Stang on the street.
As I orignially said, 99-04 GT is low 14s stock manual and high 14s stock auto.
zero3mach1dsg said:the same can be said about the 05 GT they ran don't you think???
and yes, i'm also waiting to see them at the tracks, i guess they're properly broken-in by now....
I would start believing some times when i see this car running down the tracks
Not only that, but people are comparing times for different tracks. I still have yet to see a Mach 1 hit the 12's at my local track. Saw one running consistent 13.1's with 4.10's, MT's, and a 5000 RPM clutch-dump. (Not digging on Mach 1's at all, just pointing out that track conditions make a noticable difference). So I'm guessing I'll be seeing 05's running low 14's, maybe some high 13's.ttown said:This is typical mag racing where you own one car so you quote the best time ever recorded for it and then find the worst time you can find for the other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?