Bob Cosby said:Oh. Could you please post the link to them? I can't seem to find them. Better yet, you attached them to that post, so if you could just please attach them to your next reply to this post, that would work just fine.
Thanks.
I'm sorry Bob, but that is funny.mrvax said:Nice Bob. Now you're talking to a banned "member"?
mrvax said:Difference of opinion is fine, but I'm going to be tossing all trolls.
What truth is that? That you are ignorant to the possibility that i beat LS1's with my Cobra? Maybe your talking about the WS6 but if you read closely you'd see what i said:Nice that you qouted the rpm for the base model 98 non ram air model....we are talking about the 01-02 ws6 345 horse option....which is 5600...so your wrong again....but your just picking on little thing and tryoing to avoid the truth.
Do you read? Or were you so MAD and ticked OFF to see some guy saying he beat a GM car with his COBRA that you skipped right over the part where i said most were not "WS6's". hmm? Reason i said most is because there were a couple times where it was dark and i couldnt tell if it was a WS6 or not, but i didnt think it was since i beat them. I know what a WS6 has in it!I've even beaten LS1's stock to stock. (most of them WERE NOT WS6's though.)
.I am sorry...but you are full of it
I can beat ls1's because I can shifter later? what the heck...why dont you learn something about cars before you start posting a bunch of crap
Good point TYLERS!!If we do not stick together, someday we might all be talking about who gets better fuel economy out of our 64 HP 3 banger instead of who has more power.
ultrazls1 said:Go to any camaro site (dont be biased) and just ask about 01-02 dynoing 320 plus....you will find plenty of evidence.
Any race could technically be a drivers race...what I meant by that was that they are almost equal in performance....and from the numbers..it does not look like they are close enough to warrant this a "drivers race"
A 96-98 cobra has MORE power than a new GT why would it be even closer?
Oh and ls1's and 96-98 cobras make their peak power at a difference of 200 rpm....if you were shifting that much later then you were going to long.
And go ahead and check this out just to prove to you what an ls1 is capable of...http://www.airflowresearch.com/
Go to the LS1 dyno test. This is a NEAR STOCK ls1, the ls6 intake came standard on 01-02 ls1 cars. It is running a flowmaster muffler that produce almost no horsepower. It has long tube headers. So go ahead and take off 30 horsepower....this ls1 would produce around 400 horsepower...BONE STOCK Oh and a mere 530 with heads and cam.
They can dyno 320 to the wheels ALL DAY...PERIOD
ultrazls1 said:Just give the ls1 some credit...according to you guys the only newer mustang that it can beat is probably the 99-04 gt's
ultrazls1 said:I was very aware that you could have beaten an ls1 with your car...I dont doubt that....but it was becuase you were the better driver...and not that a 96-98 cobra is the faster car...it just isnt...thats what I have been talking about the whole time.
and what is with the post you just proved yourself guilty on "most of them were not ws6 cars" lol...what the heck is this...well it was dark...blah blah.
And if know a thing about ls1 cars you would not say something like..."I know what ws6 has in them"....the same exact thing every other ls1 car has....oh I forgot...ram air...HOLY COW...they are also about 100 pounds heavier than a base formula or z28.
I was not getting mad that a cobra or any ford would beat my car...I have given the 03-04 cobra props many times and CAN ADMIT defeat.
But I will not listen to some guys who says 50 more horsepower equals the slow car... THAT is what I was mad about....Its like im in the twilight zone here.
If you guys had documented dyno runs of a new ls1 with 255rwhp it would be the the biggest link on the front of this fricken website....and if I said that it could beat a mustang averaging over 300rwhp...I WOULD BE TORCHED ALIVE...by every one of you mustang boys.
ultrazls1 said:Oh and check your sources. The t/a had a 345 horse option.
Oh and go check exotic performance plus website. They usually see 260-280 rwhp on their hd1750 MUSTANG DYNO. So...they see an AVERAGE of around 310 rwhp on a dynojet.
Once again I say...it can dyno at over 320.
You're right this debate is moot I should've realized that we were getting off track but I am a victim of not reading the whole thread before posting and this arguement is probably mostly my fault and for that guys I am sorry I must apologize and to end my part in it I will no longer be posting on this thread...sorry guys...tylers65 said:Enough already.
I have tried twice now to get this thread back on track. This is the only warning I will give and then the bannings begin.
The next person (and any one following) that adds gas to this fire will be banned.
Simple enough?
302fordracer said:ok used to be big on ls1's and never saw a 345 horse option first off and second off the 05 has been running 13.3 and 13.2 check these forums people here have been doing it so that is why I say it is closer there are more things that factor into accelereation other than power (i.e. weight, gearing, aerodynamics)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?