• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

05 Mustang GT Engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blue00GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Lawman85

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2001
126
0
0
Mar 27, 2004
#21
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #21
ryanrule said:
well i know that they had to modify the bay to fit the 5.4 in the 00 cobra r
Click to expand...
blah blah blah.... use a 3lb sledge, hammer out the fender wells, and drop the V10 in it.... lol



Isn't that the way they squeezed the 428 and 429's in the 69's?
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 27, 2004
#22
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #22
HairyCanary said:
Think it over for a second -- the 4.6L is a 90* V8, so for every X distance you increase the height of the deck, you are going to get roughly X/2 increase in both width and overall height of the engine (assuming all else being equal).

Dave
Click to expand...


A little trigonometry refresher.

The cylinder banks are at a 45 degree angle to the vertical centerline of the engine. So the relationship of height & width to deck height is .707 which is the sine or cosine of 45 degrees. (or you can use the formula hypotenuse = square root of x^2 + y^2).

That is if you raise the deck height by 1", the overall height of the engine increases by .707" and the width of each cylinder bank increases by .707". However there are 2 cylinder banks so the overall width of the engine will increase by 1.414".

Specifically regarding the 5.4 vs 4.6 engines, the deck height on the 5.4 is 29mm higher = 1.1417" higher. So the 5.4L (given the same heads) will be 1.615" wider than a 4.6. The 5.4 will be .807" higher than a 4.6 before you add on the intake manifold.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 27, 2004
#23
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #23
Just another thought, a 5.4L SOHC 3 valve engine is smaller than a 4.6L DOHC 4 valve engine. So if the 4.6L DOHC will fit, as it does in the 04 Mustang, putting a 5.4L SOHC 3 valve engine in a 05 Mustang will be a piece of cake. Squeezing in a 5.4L DOHC could be a problem, but the new 3V heads flow almost as well as the DOHC heads so who cares of a 5.4 DOHC won't fit.

I still think that we will see the top of the line 06 or 07 Mustang get some form of the 5.4L S/C engine from the Ford GT. Or maybe it will be a 3 valve version.
 
B

bigred0383

New Member
Oct 27, 2003
31
0
0
43
Chicago
Mar 27, 2004
#24
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #24
Math...head hurting. As far as the 5.4 3valve being smaller than the 4.6 4valve: does the extra valve really make than much of a difference? I am not questioning your judgement, I just am astounded that it plays that big of a role size wise. Guess that shows you how much I know about engines.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Mar 28, 2004
#25
  • Mar 28, 2004
  • #25
351CJ said:
A little trigonometry refresher.
Click to expand...
I skipped trig, sorry . And my degree is in computer science, not math. Sue me.

Dave
 
V

Vlad

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
40
0
0
Mar 28, 2004
#26
  • Mar 28, 2004
  • #26
HairyCanary said:
Think it over for a second -- the 4.6L is a 90* V8, so for every X distance you increase the height of the deck, you are going to get roughly X/2 increase in both width and overall height of the engine (assuming all else being equal).

Dave
Click to expand...

yep, didnt think before I rsponded. just file that under 'duh'
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 28, 2004
#27
  • Mar 28, 2004
  • #27
HairyCanary said:
I skipped trig, sorry . And my degree is in computer science, not math. Sue me.

Dave
Click to expand...

Am I that old and out of touch? I got taught trig. in high school. What the hell do they teach you kids in HS these days anyway?
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 28, 2004
#28
  • Mar 28, 2004
  • #28
bigred0383 said:
Math...head hurting. As far as the 5.4 3valve being smaller than the 4.6 4valve: does the extra valve really make than much of a difference? I am not questioning your judgement, I just am astounded that it plays that big of a role size wise. Guess that shows you how much I know about engines.
Click to expand...

It's not the extra valve that makes the big difference, it's the extra cam.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Mar 28, 2004
#29
  • Mar 28, 2004
  • #29
351CJ said:
Am I that old and out of touch? I got taught trig. in high school. What the hell do they teach you kids in HS these days anyway?
Click to expand...
Hahaha... nah, I skipped trig and went directly to Calculus in high school. And I started with Calculus (six terms of it) in college, got straight-A's even .

I was just kidding anyway, I know plenty of trig, that's why I was allowed to skip it. I just had a brain fart when I wrote my message to that guy and I was only trying to point out that an increase in deck height meant more than just getting taller in the engine bay.

And I only *wish* I was a kid...

Dave
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 28, 2004
#30
  • Mar 28, 2004
  • #30
HairyCanary said:
Hahaha... nah, I skipped trig and went directly to Calculus in high school. Dave
Click to expand...

OK Dave, I feel a lot better now that I know my tax dollars aren't being completely wasted.
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Mar 29, 2004
#31
  • Mar 29, 2004
  • #31
Start worrying again. I'm just 9 years out of high school and I don't remember a lick of the Trig or Cal I had in school.
 

USAF-Sergeant

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
43
0
0
Charleston, SC
Mar 29, 2004
#32
  • Mar 29, 2004
  • #32
More detail please

351CJ said:
It's not the extra valve that makes the big difference, it's the extra cam.
Click to expand...

Would you mind going into more detail on just how that helps? You said the extra cam helps, but the 4.6 is still a SOHC. I would understand you responce better if it was a DOHC. Thanks for the help.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 29, 2004
#33
  • Mar 29, 2004
  • #33
USAF-Sergeant said:
Would you mind going into more detail on just how that helps? You said the extra cam helps, but the 4.6 is still a SOHC. I would understand you responce better if it was a DOHC. Thanks for the help.
Click to expand...

Go back and re-read the thread.

I made the comment that the 5.4L SOHC 3 valve is physically smaller than the 4.6L DOHC 4 valve.

Someone made the comment "the extra valve makes a big difference, I don't understand"

So what I was saying is that the DOHC 4 valve heads are physically HUGE which make the 4.6 DOHC a HUGE engine.

Bottom line is that I'm guessing that a 5.4 DOHC engine will not fit into the 05 Stang, but a 5.4 SOHC engine (as well as a 4.6L DOHC) will fit into the 05 Stang.

You also have to figure in that fitting is one thing, but being able to install the engine from the bottom of the car as it is done on the assembly line is something else.

I'm still guessing that we will see a 5.4L DOHC engine in the Cobra-R, but like the last R it will be a limited production vehicle possibly finished off the line. All other 05 and later variants will be built on the same assembly line and will have to fit the restrictions of that line - the engine must be able to be installed from below with adequate clearance.
 
D

demillso

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
5
0
0
Mar 29, 2004
#34
  • Mar 29, 2004
  • #34
bigred0383 said:
Math...head hurting. As far as the 5.4 3valve being smaller than the 4.6 4valve: does the extra valve really make than much of a difference? I am not questioning your judgement, I just am astounded that it plays that big of a role size wise. Guess that shows you how much I know about engines.
Click to expand...

Its not the extra valve that makes the difference, its the extra cam that makes the heads so much wider. Also, while we're dreaming of engines, does anyone have any measurements on the DOHC V10 that the Cobra and 427 concepts used?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
P
2007 Mustang GT 4.6 Screeching bottom end or tranny
  • Prabh114
  • Mar 29, 2022
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
964
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Mar 29, 2022
Dino Dino Bambino
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
S
05 Mustang GT Engine Wiring Harness Diagram
  • SpencerH
  • Apr 14, 2020
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
4K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 14, 2020
SpencerH
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?