• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

07 GT350H with power upgrade. Hell Yeah.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bloody Guts
  • Start date Start date Mar 23, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Bloody Guts

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
23
0
0
Metro Detroit
Mar 23, 2006
#1
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #1
supposedly at the New York auto show

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060323/FREE/60321001/1062

check it

j
 

nwoh50

New Member
May 4, 2005
11
0
0
Toledo,Ohio
Mar 23, 2006
#2
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #2
They didn't spell his name right !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"New York show briefs: Nissan to unveil new Altima, second-gen MDX concept, Sheby GT350H reincarnated"

yea... they know cars lol
 

V6WBlue05

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
39
0
0
Battle Ground, WA
Mar 23, 2006
#3
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #3
Sheby GT350H reincarnated

That's the new GM version of the Mustang!
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 23, 2006
#4
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #4
If it's that V6 Shelby abomination just painted black I'll
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Mar 24, 2006
#5
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #5
351CJ said:
If it's that V6 Shelby abomination just painted black I'll
Click to expand...

+1

I think a N/A 350 HP DOHC would be hot though.
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Mar 24, 2006
#6
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #6
CatmanJJ said:
I think a N/A 350 HP DOHC would be hot though.
Click to expand...
My vote is the 5 liter cammer.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Mar 24, 2006
#7
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #7
I don't know if we'll ever see that beauty in a production stang but that'd be hot.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Mar 24, 2006
#8
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #8
Just a quick question. How many times has Ford or Shelby used the GT### designator and had it be a V6? The new Shelby supercharged V6 is not a GT###. It's a CS6.
 

Power4

Member
May 10, 2004
200
0
16
Rochester, NY
Mar 24, 2006
#9
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #9
SVTdriver said:
Just a quick question. How many times has Ford or Shelby used the GT### designator and had it be a V6? The new Shelby supercharged V6 is not a GT###. It's a CS6.
Click to expand...

Same point I was going to make. I wonder if this'll be a production vehicle or just a show car?
 

stang dreamer

New Member
May 24, 2005
0
0
0
Manchester, UK
Mar 24, 2006
#10
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #10
whats so bad about the CS6? its stock at around 300hp... thats hittin the GT on the head right there. the only thing its missing is the 2 extra cyls...
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 24, 2006
#11
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #11
Hate to burst your bubbles, but the most credible info. so far says that it will have only 320 HP from a "tuned" version of the standard GT 4.6L, 3V. In addition, you will NOT be able to buy one, at least for a year or two until Hertz dumps them on the used car market. Only 200 GT-350Hs will be built and all of them will be sold to Hertz.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Mar 24, 2006
#12
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #12
stang dreamer said:
whats so bad about the CS6? its stock at around 300hp... thats hittin the GT on the head right there. the only thing its missing is the 2 extra cyls...
Click to expand...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the CS6. But it does not have a GT designator.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Mar 24, 2006
#13
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #13
351CJ said:
Hate to burst your bubbles, but the most credible info. so far says that it will have only 320 HP from a "tuned" version of the standard GT 4.6L, 3V. In addition, you will NOT be able to buy one, at least for a year or two until Hertz dumps them on the used car market. Only 200 GT-350Hs will be built and all of them will be sold to Hertz.
Click to expand...

I hope that is untrue only for the simple reason. That would make that care more rare than the GT500 and therefore. Could potentially have a higher resale value.
 
J

jasonlee0704

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
219
0
0
Kansas City, MO
Mar 26, 2006
#14
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #14
Anyone who pays more for a 320 HP Mustang over a ~475 HP Mustang just because the build numbers are lower needs to have their head checked.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Mar 26, 2006
#15
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #15
jasonlee0704 said:
Anyone who pays more for a 320 HP Mustang over a ~475 HP Mustang just because the build numbers are lower needs to have their head checked.
Click to expand...

Lower build means rarer car. More chance of higher resale value. It's actually a no-brainer. Example. I bet the 00Cobra R is selling for more than an 03 Cobra. But it has less hp and less built. So does that mean people who buy it should have thier head examined?
 

Pirateinastang

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
30
0
0
Carlisle, PA.
Mar 27, 2006
#16
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #16
I think there is a slight difference.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Mar 27, 2006
#17
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #17
Pirateinastang said:
I think there is a slight difference.
Click to expand...

I would guess that depends on what you mean by slight difference. They are both the same bodystyle. Both made by SVT. Both nearly the same power. Which will likely (With execption to power) be the same as the GT500 and GT350
 

sacha

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
84
0
0
Mar 28, 2006
#18
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #18
Honestly though, how rare is this car? Yes, there will only be 200 officially made, but it's no different than a GT with a CAI, a tune and a black&gold paint job. They should've modified it a bit more to make it special/unique. If this is the GT350H, I guess anyone with a CAI and tune can now say they drive a GT350. This is a real blunder by Ford in my opinion.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 28, 2006
#19
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #19
For eveyone who was doubting me, scroll down to post #5.

If the illustration is accurate is will have some unique body parts.

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28939
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Mar 28, 2006
#20
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #20
looks good to me!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Stiffer front springs writeup from the old .net site
  • LILCBRA
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Oct 29, 2022
Enzio
J
Electrical No crank no dash no nothing, troubleshooting leads to more questions
  • Jojam99
  • Jun 2, 2022
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 2, 2022
Jojam99
J
M
Brake free play issue after installing CSRP front disc power brake conversion kit on 1965 Mustang
  • mustang6518
  • Jan 31, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
7K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 29, 2025
lwg8tr0514
L
Progress Thread Haven't posted in a looong time... rescuing another 'stang... '89 Vert
  • ChillPhatCat
  • May 20, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2023
joeballz83
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?