• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

1/4 mile vid of 05 Stang GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter posm6s
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
T

trublustang03

New Member
Dec 12, 2002
79
0
0
New Jersey
Jul 30, 2004
#21
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #21
This video is all over every mustang forum I have been to. From what I can gather from people that were there at that track is that the car was a 5 speed auto and the guy driving had a ton of instrumentation equipment in the car. He was taking it easy on the launch according to people. I would not worry too much about this 14.2 as I see this car at least doing 13.5 as manual and 13.9 as an auto. Think about it, plenty of 5 speed guys in 99-04 stangs hover around 14.0 to 14.2 in 1/4 mile times, I am pretty sure ford did not make this brand new Mustang slower than the outgoing Mustang.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jul 30, 2004
#22
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #22
trublustang03 said:
I am pretty sure ford did not make this brand new Mustang slower than the outgoing Mustang.
Click to expand...

*cough* 94 GT *cough*

 

JimBowy

Member
Nov 8, 2003
330
0
17
Downriver, Mi
Jul 30, 2004
#23
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #23
posm6s said:
Found this on another forum.

Video

Does 14.2 at 95 with the 5-speed manual.

Seems kinda slow but maybe it was the driver. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

posm6s, if you could tell me what other forum you found this on?
i just noticed the video is from my local track!
 

GelatiCruiser

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
1,054
0
0
1 Mile South of Somewhere.
Jul 30, 2004
#24
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #24
CatmanJJ said:
96 mph??? My GT trapped higher then that with just a catback and my Mach trapped close to 104 with 500 miles on the ticker and stock. Must be the driving, conditions, the track etc. I'm willing to bet teh new GT is a solid mid 13 sec car.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I'd assume they're also "babying" these cars.
 

Black_Bullit

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
272
0
0
South East MI
Jul 30, 2004
#25
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #25
An auto GT running low 14s is an improvement over the current GT, right?

If the 2005 comes out with near 300 HP it will run mid 13s IMO.

On top of that, guys doing 13 second passes in their Mach 1's are either

a) driving that same car all the time (so they really know how to launch it)
or
b) working for a car magazine that specializes in acceleration times (C&D doesn't speed shift, doesn't pre-heat tires, etc.)
Click to expand...

I'm going to disagree with this statement. The second time I took my Mach to the track I ran a 13.5. The only reason I didn't run in the 13s the first time is because there were puddles of water on the starting line. The day I ran the 13.5 another Mach ran a 13.2 and it was his his first time ever at a dragstrip. Granted he's owned muscle cars since the 70s including a 428 Mach.

And I'm no magazine driver as I had driven a stick at the strip one other time before my Mach.
 

posm6s

New Member
Sep 24, 2003
144
0
0
Eddyville, KY
Jul 30, 2004
#26
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #26
I found out it is a 5-speed auto(mybad) and he was babing it. He also had some extra instrumentation inside the car. Prolly was running some simple test and not really racing it to hard.

I think the car should do better. Yea its an auto but its a 5-speed so that should help.IMO



JimBowy said:
posm6s, if you could tell me what other forum you found this on?
i just noticed the video is from my local track!
Click to expand...
SVTPerformance
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 30, 2004
#27
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #27
I never saw the time?!?!
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Jul 30, 2004
#28
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #28
Ryan02Stang said:
I never saw the time?!?!
Click to expand...

you hear the guy say it at the end
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Jul 30, 2004
#29
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #29
trublustang03 said:
This video is all over every mustang forum I have been to. From what I can gather from people that were there at that track is that the car was a 5 speed auto and the guy driving had a ton of instrumentation equipment in the car. He was taking it easy on the launch according to people. I would not worry too much about this 14.2 as I see this car at least doing 13.5 as manual and 13.9 as an auto. Think about it, plenty of 5 speed guys in 99-04 stangs hover around 14.0 to 14.2 in 1/4 mile times, I am pretty sure ford did not make this brand new Mustang slower than the outgoing Mustang.
Click to expand...
Got a link to where other people were talking about this? That would seem very likely to me, thanks
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 30, 2004
#30
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #30
QUICK91LX said:
you hear the guy say it at the end
Click to expand...
Oh...i didn't have my sound on. That guy could have said anything...who knows what it actually ran.
 
Z

Z28x

New Member
Sep 19, 2003
644
0
0
Albany NY
Jul 30, 2004
#31
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #31
95mph trap

So much for those underrated 4.6L rumors. Can the new A5 really be that much of a dog????
 

yellow5.0cobra

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2002
2,849
0
0
In the garage, On the floor.
Jul 30, 2004
#32
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #32
come on guys stop making excuses...

let it be until some official times have been posted.

we can go on FOREVER with excuses.
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Jul 30, 2004
#33
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #33
trublustang03 said:
I am pretty sure ford did not make this brand new Mustang slower than the outgoing Mustang.
Click to expand...

CatmanJJ said:
*cough* 94 GT *cough*

Click to expand...

*cough* 96 GT *cough*
 
T

trublustang03

New Member
Dec 12, 2002
79
0
0
New Jersey
Jul 30, 2004
#34
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #34
Here you go jadesville.

http://www.mustangworld.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=220395

http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?showtopic=3773

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=115507

There were about three or four more other forums where everybody is having the same disscussion. Guess everybody is up in arms.
 

M1Rifle

New Member
May 23, 2004
137
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#35
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #35
Black_Bullit said:
An auto GT running low 14s is an improvement over the current GT, right?

If the 2005 comes out with near 300 HP it will run mid 13s IMO.



I'm going to disagree with this statement. The second time I took my Mach to the track I ran a 13.5. The only reason I didn't run in the 13s the first time is because there were puddles of water on the starting line. The day I ran the 13.5 another Mach ran a 13.2 and it was his his first time ever at a dragstrip. Granted he's owned muscle cars since the 70s including a 428 Mach.

And I'm no magazine driver as I had driven a stick at the strip one other time before my Mach.
Click to expand...


Then you are a good driver!

I have to think that you'd done some hot launches on the street from time-to-time, however (grin). It's all practice. How long did you own the Mach 1 before you drove it on the 1/4 mile strip?

The point was well-made by others that this guy wasn't launching hard. Maybe he was babying it, maybe he was afraid he'd sit in cloud of smoke and go nowhere unless he launched soft. Whatever it is, we can see that he didn't launch very hard.
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Jul 30, 2004
#36
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #36
Z28x said:
95mph trap

So much for those underrated 4.6L rumors. Can the new A5 really be that much of a dog????
Click to expand...

no, it probably isnt that much of a dog. from what is being said here, the guy was doing tests with it and wasnt being run hard. i wouldnt be surprised if the new A5 GT runs in the 13's. that would be killer, an automatic mustang in the 13's!
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Jul 30, 2004
#37
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #37
Z28x said:
95mph trap

So much for those underrated 4.6L rumors. Can the new A5 really be that much of a dog????
Click to expand...

How can you draw a conclusion from one little video with absolutely no evidence that he car was being taken to its limit?





Never mind, I'll answer for you....YOU CAN'T! How about we wait until there are few magazine reviews and some real world passes by more than one car by different drivers before we pass judgement?
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Jul 30, 2004
#38
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #38
Wow cool video I cant believe someone got a video of it at a strip.
 

StangFreak32

New Member
Jul 16, 2004
75
0
0
Baton Rouge, La
Jul 30, 2004
#39
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #39
u can just listen to the car and tell its not being ran hard....and plus look at his start off...like someone else said it looks like he was just taking off from a city stop light....and im really not worried cuz ive seen people run high 14s in cobras on their first runs...then a few minutes later be doing high 12s....so as everyone else says wait for mm&ff to do a test
 

Black_Bullit

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
272
0
0
South East MI
Jul 31, 2004
#40
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #40
It's all practice. How long did you own the Mach 1 before you drove it on the 1/4 mile strip?
Click to expand...

I had 1000 miles on the car when I ran the 13.5.

There was a Mach at the track today running 14.0s. I asked him at what RPM he was shifting and he said 5800. Doh. He should be shifting 1st at 6800 and the other gears at around 6200-6400.
It was his first day at the track.

It's really easy to get a 300 fwhp mustang to run 13s. If the 2005 has 300 you'll see a bunch of 13s IMO.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
146
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
322
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
224
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
415
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?