• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

1.6 Or 1.7 Roller Rockers

  • Thread starter Thread starter craiger302
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2016
C

craiger302

New Member
Jan 2, 2016
5
0
1
Jan 2, 2016
#1
  • Jan 2, 2016
  • #1
I've got a stock rebuilt 302 (carbed) out of an 88 (E8SE)
I plan to go E303 cam, and gt40/p heads

*Do u guys recommend using 1.7 or 1.6 roller rockers?

*what springs do u guys recommend using for an e303 cam?

I'm thinking about comp cam 44308-1 valve springs
 
Last edited: Jan 2, 2016

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 2, 2016
#2
  • Jan 2, 2016
  • #2
e cam IMO is a poor choice. I would go with either a TFS1 or Anderson n41 and whatver springs they recommend. For rockers, I would go with 1.6.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Jan 2, 2016
#3
  • Jan 2, 2016
  • #3
Agree with Mike. I know Anderson has a high rev spring kit also.
 
C

craiger302

New Member
Jan 2, 2016
5
0
1
Jan 3, 2016
#4
  • Jan 3, 2016
  • #4
Cool thx guys, why 1.6 though?
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Jan 3, 2016
#5
  • Jan 3, 2016
  • #5
Most your camshafts are based off 1.6 rockers. So if a manufacture gives specs of said cam, and says that it will fit stock pistons, adding 1.7s may cause interference issues.

Obviously, some cams will be designed for 1.7s, Anderson has 1 or 2. Also, the use of aftermarket pistons may allow for 1.7s to be used. I ran 1.7s with my gt40s and anderson n41 cam, but I had the appropriate valve springs and aftermarket SRS pistons.

Joe
 
Reactions: craiger302 and A5literMan
D

Dave2000GT

Active Member
Oct 3, 2005
229
26
39
Seattle
Jan 3, 2016
#6
  • Jan 3, 2016
  • #6
I'd say 1.6.
Valve stability is key and far more important than possibly a tiny bit of extra flow that 1.7's allow. I ran both 1.6/1.7 on my gt40p's and I couldn't tell a difference other than the 1.6 were quieter. Dyno tests on N/A 5.0's don't really show any gains either.
 
C

craiger302

New Member
Jan 2, 2016
5
0
1
Jan 4, 2016
#7
  • Jan 4, 2016
  • #7
So if I use my stock 88 heads then 1.6 rockers will work? With an e303 cam or n-41 cam
 
C

craiger302

New Member
Jan 2, 2016
5
0
1
Jan 4, 2016
#8
  • Jan 4, 2016
  • #8
So if I use my stock 88 heads then 1.6 rockers will work? With an e303 cam or n-41 cam
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Jan 4, 2016
#9
  • Jan 4, 2016
  • #9
Yes, just remember that the stock heads use pedestal mount rockers, not stud mount. When I ran the n41, I asked greg anderson about running it with 1.7s on stock pistons. He told me there was no way it would work. I ended up needing an over bore and bought nice pistons, which had deeper reliefs. But yes, you will be fine with 1.6s.

Joe
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,780
6,935
214
SW Houston
Jan 4, 2016
#10
  • Jan 4, 2016
  • #10
1.6 is the stock ratio, so if they don't work, you have other issues. Whatever cam you end up with, look up a spec card and buy springs based on the required spring rates for that cam.

Buying springs thinking they'll work for most applications is an expensive lesson in futility. (Ask me how I know.)
 
Reactions: A5literMan

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 4, 2016
#11
  • Jan 4, 2016
  • #11
craiger302 said:
So if I use my stock 88 heads then 1.6 rockers will work? With an e303 cam or n-41 cam
Click to expand...

Take this for what it is worth. I would not bother swapping out cams if you are leaving the stock heads. Just leave the stock cam and put a set of 1.7 rockers in. You will get around the same lift as a B cam with better LSA and idle.
 
C

craiger302

New Member
Jan 2, 2016
5
0
1
Jan 5, 2016
#12
  • Jan 5, 2016
  • #12
Thanks everyone for your help and advice
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
149
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
714
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
219
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
B
SN95 New Heads
  • Blakeknight
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
952
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
852
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?